socialization l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Socialization PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Socialization

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 19

Socialization - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 381 Views
  • Uploaded on

Socialization. How we become who we are…. Nature vs. Nurture (Review). Twin Studies Monkey Studies (Harlow Experiments) Isolated/Feral Children Genie – Introduction Genie – Follow-up Feral Children. Basic Conclusions.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Socialization' - earl


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
socialization

Socialization

How we become who we are…

nature vs nurture review
Nature vs. Nurture (Review)
  • Twin Studies
  • Monkey Studies (Harlow Experiments)
  • Isolated/Feral Children
    • Genie – Introduction
    • Genie – Follow-up
    • Feral Children
basic conclusions
Basic Conclusions
  • The limits of certain and physical and mental abilities are established by heredity (such as sports ability and math ability), but basic orientations to life such as attitudes are the result of environment
  • Thus, for some parts of life, the blueprint is drawn by heredity; but even here, the environment can redraw those lines. For other parts, the individual is a blank slate and it is entirely up to the environment to determine what is written on it.
how do we develop a self
How do we develop a self?
  • Symbolic Interactionist theories on self development.
    • Charles Horton Cooley – The Looking-Glass Self
    • George Herbert Mead – Role Taking
    • Irving Goffman - Dramaturgy
cooley on socialization
Cooley on Socialization
  • The “Looking-Glass Self”
    • I am not what I think I am.
    • I am not what you think I am.
    • I am what I thinkyou think I am.
cooley on socialization6
Cooley on Socialization
  • We imagine the way we appear to others.
  • We then imagine others’ judgment of that appearance.
  • And finally, we react to that imagined judgment.
mead on role taking
Mead on Role Taking
  • 2 Stages in the Development of the Self
    • Play Stage: Taking the role of significant others
    • Game Stage: Taking the role of the generalized other
agents of socialization
Agents of Socialization
  • Family
  • Friends/Peers
  • Education
  • Religion
  • Media
  • Which is most important?
impact of media as an agent of socialization
Impact of Media as an Agent of Socialization
  • 87% of American households have more than one television
  • 50% of children have televisions in their room
  • The average American child watches 28 hours of television a week
  • By the age of 18 the average American child will have seen 16,000 simulated murders and 200,000 acts of violence
impact of media as an agent of socialization12
Impact of Media as an Agent of Socialization
  • In 1972, the Surgeon General released a report based on a review of existing literature and specifically commissioned research. The report concluded that “there was strong evidence to indicate that over several measures of aggressive behavior there was a significant and consistent correlation between television viewing and aggressive behavior. Second, the report concluded, on the basis of experimental evidence that there was a directional, causal link between exposure to televised violence and subsequent aggressive behavior by the viewer.”
nimh report
NIMH Report
  • 10 years later, the National Institute of Mental Health released the following: “After ten more years of research, the consensus among most of the research community is that violence on television does lead to aggressive behavior by children and teenagers who watch the programs. This conclusion is based on laboratory experiments and on field studies. Not all children become violent, of course, but the correlations between violence and aggression are positive. In magnitude, television violence is as strongly correlated with aggressive behavior as any other behavioral variable that has been measured. The research question has moved from asking whether or not there is an effect to seeking explanations for the effect.”
other research
Other Research
  • During the next 10 years, research had uncovered several new findings…
    • The effects are not gender specific (both boys and girls are affected)
    • The amount of violence had not decreased since the Surgeon General’s report in 1972.
    • Viewers were learning more than aggressive behavior from violent programming…may learn to identify with the victims of crime leading to fear and apprehension about being a victim of crime.
slide15
Commission on Youth and Violence(American Psychological Association 1993)Six Conclusions on Youth and Violence
  • Universal exposure
  • Strong correlations with aggression and desensitization
  • May be lifelong consequences
  • Even those that do not become violent are impacted:
    • Fear of being victimized
    • Behavioral apathy
    • Increased appetite for violence
  • Distorted views of violence against women
  • Effects can be mitigated
american psychiatric association
American Psychiatric Association
  • In 1996, the American Psychiatric Association released a statement claiming, “The debate is over.”
    • The statement referenced the National Television Violence Study which found—
      • The majority of all television programming contains violence
      • Perpetrators of violence were unsanctioned in 73% of violent scenes
      • Commercial programming for children is 50-60 times more violent than prime-time programming for adults
what the public wants
What the Public Wants?
  • The response from media executives is frequently that they are just giving the public what it wants. In response to this claim, the AMA conducted a study that found that 75% of adults with children have walked out of a movie or turned off the television because the content was too violent.
further support
Further Support
  • In the wake of these reports, the Centers of Disease Control and the National Academy of Science have come forward with support for these findings.
judiciary committee on media violence
Judiciary Committee on Media Violence
  • The study takes a different approach—it starts with the premise that violent media can be harmful to children and then asks the following questions:
    • Do the motion picture, music recording and electronic game industries promote products they themselves acknowledge warrant parental caution in venues where children make up a substantial percentage of the audience?
    • And, are these advertisements intended to attract children and teenagers?
  • After a comprehensive 15-month study, the researchers concluded that the answer to both questions is ‘yes.’