1 / 58

H1N1 in Massachusetts:

H1N1 in Massachusetts:. A Review of the Impact, the Response and Lessons for the Future January 15, 2010. Why This Matters. When it Hits, it Hits Fast. Planning is needed ahead of time to be minimize impact. When H1N1 hit, it hit quickly and with a good deal of uncertainty.

eara
Download Presentation

H1N1 in Massachusetts:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. H1N1 in Massachusetts: A Review of the Impact, the Response and Lessons for the Future January 15, 2010

  2. Why This Matters

  3. When it Hits, it Hits Fast Planning is needed ahead of time to be minimize impact

  4. When H1N1 hit, it hit quickly and with a good deal of uncertainty

  5. While initial fears were unfounded: The toll in the U.S. was high • Cases: Almost one in five Americans had the H1N1 flu – or about 57 million people. • Hospitalizations: About 250,000 people were hospitalized due to H1N1. • Deaths: An estimated 12,000 people died from H1N1. Three and half times more children died in this flu outbreak than a usual seasonal flu outbreak.

  6. And it could have been higher:There just isn’t any way to know ahead of time

  7. The Solution: Prepare for any possibility

  8. Necessary Tasks to Prepare for a Pandemic • Monitoring and analyzing cases and outbreaks • Preventing infection thru multiple approaches • Administering of a vaccine • Educating of the public/media coverage • Insuring access to needed clinical care • Distributing medications to clinicians

  9. Our Planning Had Been Tested by Previous Emergencies • Anthrax, 2001 • Katrina, 2006 • Ice Storms, 2008

  10. So How Did We Do in H1N1?

  11. Laboratory Sciences and Case Surveillance

  12. The Hinton Laboratory Confirmed the Early H1N1 Cases • Testing of samples from hospitals gave an early picture of who was ill with flu • Massachusetts was an early CDC approved site for confirmatory testing

  13. Epidemiologists traced the cases: Percentage of Influenza-Like Illness Visits Reported by Sentinel Provider Sites – Massachusetts (as of 2/4/10) November February May Source: Massachusetts Immunization Program

  14. Preliminary Data Massachusetts Department of Public Health February 2010, Do Not Distribute

  15. Access to Medical Care

  16. Strong Links to Clinicians on the Front Lines • Specialized guidelines developed • Regular conference calls • Active leadership of Mass. Medical Society, Academy of Pediatrics, Mass. Hospital Assoc. and Mass League of CHCs

  17. Guaranteeing Appropriate Care • Planning to insure that medications & supplies are available where needed • Encouraging flu care at home for most/avoidance of unneeded MD visits • 1.2 million copies of “Flu Care at Home” distributed

  18. Medication Distribution from State/Fed. Stockpile:Antivirals and Personal Protective Equipment--spring, 2009

  19. Vaccination

  20. 2009 – 2010 Seasonal Flu Vaccine National supply earlier than usual but arriving in stages–full amount by Nov. MDPH distributed 10% more than last season Unprecedented demand led to shortages in seasonal vaccine. Emphasis on traditional risk groups

  21. Target Groups for H1N1 Vaccine(per ACIP) Pregnant women Household and caregiver contacts of children <6 months of age Health care and emergency medical services personnel Children from 6 months through 18 years Persons aged 19-24 – 2nd tier Persons aged 25 through 64 years who have specified medical conditions – 2nd tier

  22. Federal Government Funds Vaccination Efforts • DPH receives federal funding for vaccination efforts • Local/regional health coalitions received grants and prepare to respond • Vaccine to be offered for free

  23. Expanding the Ranks of the Vaccinators • The Massachusetts Public Health Council passed emergency regulations allowing the following to vaccinate (if properly trained/overseen): • Paramedics • Pharmacists (for those 12 years above) • Dentists • Nursing students • Medical students

  24. But then the vaccine didn’t come in the quantities needed

  25. It finally arrived…and clinicians, local public health & schools responded • Total number of vaccine clinics in Mass.– approximately 1,500 • Total vaccine administered – more than 2 million doses (about 1/3 of the Mass. residents were vaccinated) • 39% of children were vaccinated in MA. vs. 28% nationwide by end of Dec. • 28% of the initial priority group adults were vaccinated in MA. by the end of Dec. vs. 16% nationwide

  26. Community Mitigation

  27. Key Activities - Schools • Working with schools around key actions: • Health hygiene • Screening of ill students • Communicating with parents • Remaining open • Understanding and complying with guidance • Partnering with DESE – hiring a specialized staff person

  28. Many school closed in the spring- fewer in the fall • 44 schools & pre-schools closed in the spring of 2009 • 7 schools & pre-schools closed in the fall of 2009

  29. Parents’ Agreement with School Closure Decision % of parents* saying… Strongly agree Somewhat agree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree % of parents* saying there was a time since the start of the school year that they felt their child’s school should have closed due to H1N1 but did not No Yes *Among parents in high closure areas who experienced a school closure (n=523) 30 Harvard Opinion Research Program, Harvard School of Public Health, November 19-December 9, 2009.

  30. Parents’ Satisfaction with School Closure Information % of parents* saying… Very satisfied Somewhat satisfied Not very satisfied Not at all satisfied *Among parents in high closure areas who experienced a school closure (n=523) 31 Harvard Opinion Research Program, Harvard School of Public Health, November 19-December 9, 2009.

  31. Communication Planning

  32. Built on a long tradition of awareness

  33. Sometimes with misinformation

  34. Sometimes with lots of misinformation

  35. Statewide Communication Effort • Use public information campaign on vaccination, prevention and mitigation • Tailor messages to key, at risk populations • Insure multi-lingual effort • Create “ReadyCam” capacity • Use web site, blog and twitter • Prioritize media relations

  36. Flu Facts Campaignin multiple languages

  37. Federal Materials Availablewith focus on particular target groups

  38. Educational materials distributed

  39. There were some particular characteristics of interest

  40. The young were especially affected

  41. People of color were particularly affected

  42. New ways to communicate were used

  43. We Blogged • Total Views 4/26 – 6/25: • 128,900 • Average per day prior to 4/26/09: • 184 • Average per day from 4/26/09: • 2148

  44. Specialized Materials Were Developed for Multiple Audiences in Multiple Languages General Public – 15 languages Parents and Families Specific populations: e.g., pregnant women Clinicians and health care providers Schools and child care professionals Colleges and universities Employers Shelters and congregate facilities Summer camps

  45. We Broke New Ground in Communications Efforts • 458,000 visitors to our H1N1 web pages - 3,000 daily visitors • 2,000 followers on Twitter • 1,000 organizations either order materials • Cable TV videos programs on 170 stations • 30 second spots played at movie theatres and retail check-out monitors • Videos produced in 6 languages/written material in 15 languages • Regular specialized “ethnic” media work

  46. There was a noticeable increase in preventive behaviors

More Related