Earned Value Management System Standard Surveillance Program Name Supplier Name Location Name DCMA EV Monitor CMO Name

1. Earned Value Management System Standard Surveillance Program Name Supplier Name Location Name DCMA EV Monitor CMO Name Date 1

2. PEOPLE PROCESS TOOLS TECHNIQUES Program Management System Program Name Qualified, available personnel performing in accordance with the processes within their System Description Documented processes (list processes within system description) being reviewed Output Input Management uses EVMS data for decision making and managing their program ANSI/EIA-748 EVM Compliant System • Supporting computer software systems to automate System Description processes 2

3. Scope of Review • Program Name • Business Unit (if applicable) • EVMS Process Area(s) (e.g. Organizing, Scheduling, Accounting etc) • Specific Guidelines • Control Accounts • Program Manager • Other Functional Team Leads • Teaming: DCMA, DoD Program Office, DCAA etc

4. Findings • Review was conducted as planned • Number CAMs were interviewed • PM and number Managers interviewed • Number Corrective Action Requests have been prepared and will be provided • Final report will be written by date (within 20 business days) 4

5. CARs by Level • Corrective Action Requests (CARs) • Number Level I CARs • Number System Description comments • Number Level II CARs • Number Level III CARs Level III CARs= Guideline non-compliant, significant deficiency that requires corporate management attention • Level II CARs = Guideline non-compliant, significant deficiency, that materially affects program performance measurement • Level I CARs = Less significant deficiency, still requires fixing, minor or no impact on performance measurement 9

6. FindingsCAR Summary (Examples) PEOPLE • Replace with CAR bullets that are people (knowledge) related (see samples below) (Be sure to delete this bullet prior to presentation) • EV techniques, LOE usage and rules • Planning irregularities • VARs • Managerial action 6

7. FindingsCAR Summary (Examples) PROCESS • Replace with CAR bullets that are process related (see samples below) (Be sure to delete this bullet prior to presentation) • BCR validity and process • Data Irregularities • Variance Analysis • Incomplete Documentation • EAC development • VAR – Lack of Tracking • Material Management Process/Standards • Lack of horizontal and vertical schedule integration • ICS/IMS-vertical integration 7

8. FindingsCAR Summary (Examples) TOOLS • Replace with CAR bullets that are tool (implementation) related (see samples below) (Be sure to delete this bullet prior to presentation) • LOE BCWP ≠ BCWS (Progress Tracker to MS Project) • Corrective action log not fully populated and used 8

9. Composite Trend by Guideline

10. Way Forward • Provide a corrective action plan by (10 business days) to DCMA EV monitor • MS Project schedule reflecting the steps and time necessary to address all CARs • Failure to show progress in correcting deficiencies may result in remedial action • -In-depth compliance review by DCMA EVM Center • -Revoke Validation status • -Recommended contractual remedies • DCMA will issue final report by Date (no later than 20 business days after out-brief) 10