1 / 11

Faculty Evaluations

Faculty Evaluations. Dr. Kay Pasley Norejane Hendrickson Professor Chair, Family and Child Sciences. The Plan. Why What How The Hard Part. The Why…. Acknowledge performance & accomplishments Clarify expectations & set goals Assess progress towards P & T.

dmontalto
Download Presentation

Faculty Evaluations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Faculty Evaluations Dr. Kay Pasley Norejane Hendrickson Professor Chair, Family and Child Sciences

  2. The Plan Why What How The Hard Part

  3. The Why… • Acknowledge performance & accomplishments • Clarify expectations & set goals • Assess progress towards P & T • Identify strengths & weaknesses • Identify meritorious accomplishments & nominees for awards

  4. The Important Why… Develop plans for remedying deficiencies and building strengths

  5. The What Assignment of responsibility Departmental and College criteria Standardized set of materials provided by faculty, peers, review committee (if there is one)

  6. Nature of the data… Copies of scholarly works/publications Teaching evaluations (students, peers) Recognitions/awards Grants submitted and awarded Documentation of service 1-3 year goals statement Updated vitae

  7. Formatting the data… Scholarly work or publications • Number • Nature (e.g., books, text, articles) • Journal rankings • Citations by others • Order of authorship Grants submitted & awarded • Number • PI & Co-PI • Sources & amounts Teaching evaluations • Number & level of students taught • 90% vs. 30% “club” • Issues of grade inflation Awards/recognitions • Level Documented service • Level & nature Table format Share with faculty & Dean

  8. The How Chair Discussion “Ranking” Faculty Member Evaluation Committee Materials

  9. My take on the “how” Good data are essential Understanding the context and history Commitment to fairness and quality Consistency in application of criteria Recognition of and building on strengths Ability to hold the line Importance of transparency

  10. Addressing Deficiencies Least fun, but essential; true sign of leadership Work from data (usefulness of table) Data from personal files (notes) Apply criteria consistently Keep Dean informed Use expertise on campus

  11. How to best do this… Adequate preparation (written notes) Be direct and frank Use “sandwich technique” Suggest plan of action, follow up in writing Allow time for consideration Revise (if necessary) and confirm plan in writing with signatures

More Related