1 / 6

Toward a Common Data Language for the Elections Space

Toward a Common Data Language for the Elections Space. What are elections officials looking for?. Overview.

diella
Download Presentation

Toward a Common Data Language for the Elections Space

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Toward a Common Data Language for the Elections Space What are elections officials looking for?

  2. Overview • The need for a common data language is analogous to the use of a common language for people and economies to share the best of ideas, products, and services. A language used exclusively by a few isolates people from the rest of what the world has to offer. • The elections’ space suffers from an inability to share data across platforms. Voting systems are basically closed systems within a vendor and a lack of a common language creates difficulties sharing data with other systems that need voting system data.

  3. VR and VotingSystems Interface voter registration systems and candidate filing systems contain information necessary to building an election and its ballot styles in a voting system (ballot layout). In some cases, vendors/ jurisdictions have collaborated on good interfaces between the two systems, some interfaces are inadequate, and many don’t exist at all. See Appendix B for a sample of Hart’s XML file.

  4. Voting Systems and Election Results Reporting Vendor Interests The prevailing business model in the elections industry doesn’t support a common data language when applied to tightly-integrated voting systems products. Election Official Concerns Election officials do not want to deal with multiple vendors. We are fearful of situations where vendors point fingers at each other and the problem doesn’t get solved. Systems Integrators Open Source Digital Voting Foundation believes it can develop specifications for voting and voter registration system components that would create a different kind of elections market.

  5. Obstacles to a Common Data Language A common election results data language would facilitate the process of rolling up election result totals from the local to the state to the national levels for all stakeholders involved in the process of reporting election results, including media. See Appendix C for samples of election result data currently provided by voting systems.

  6. Voting Systems and Online Ballot Delivery A common ballot definition language a method for updating the voter registration system with the ballot styles created by a voting system (ballot layout) is a necessary component of a functional election management system. Just beginning to open up is a new market delivering ballots online. Positioned similar to the DRE, POS, and CCOS with a need for ballot definitions and method for reporting results back to the host system. See Appendix D for a list of data elements that belong to a ballot definition.

More Related