1 / 9

PHILOSOPHY 102 (STOLZE)

PHILOSOPHY 102 (STOLZE). Notes on Dale Jamieson, “Climate Change, Responsibility, and Justice”. Risk and Responsibility. Climate change poses two kinds of risk: (1) Linear change (2) Non-linear change. Two Kinds of Responsibility. Prudential = responsibilities to oneself

didina
Download Presentation

PHILOSOPHY 102 (STOLZE)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PHILOSOPHY 102 (STOLZE) Notes on Dale Jamieson, “Climate Change, Responsibility, and Justice”

  2. Risk and Responsibility Climate change poses two kinds of risk: (1) Linear change (2) Non-linear change

  3. Two Kinds of Responsibility • Prudential = responsibilities to oneself • Ethical = responsibilities to others

  4. The Prudential Case for Responding to Climate Change • Analogy to Insurance • Economic Assessment of Expected Aggregate Damages and the Costs in Avoiding Them

  5. The Ethical Case for Responding to Climate Change Two Aspects of Ethical Responsibility: (1) Moral (2) Political

  6. Moral Responsibility • Why don’t people easily see climate change as a moral problem, though? • The causal connection: Jack and Jill thought experiments • The question of “harm causation”: Daniel Gilbert quote

  7. Jack and Jill Thought Experiments “Consider Example 1, the case of Jack intentionally stealing Jill’s bicycle.9 The individual acting intentionally has harmed another individual, the individuals and the harm are clearly identifiable, and they are closely related in time and space. If we vary the case on any of these dimensions, we may still see the case as posing a moral problem, but its claim to be a paradigm moral problem weakens. Consider some further examples. In Example 2, Jack is part of an unacquainted group of strangers, each of which, acting independently, takes one part of Jill’s bike, resulting in the bike’s disappearance. In Example 3, Jack takes one part from each of a large number of bikes, one of which belongs to Jill. In Example 4, Jack and Jill live on different continents, and the loss of Jill’s bike is the consequence of a causal chain that begins with Jack ordering a used bike at a shop. In Example 5, Jack lives many centuries before Jill, and consumes materials that are essential to bike manufacturing; as a result, it will not be possible for Jill to have a bicycle. While it may still seem that moral considerations are at stake in each of these cases, this is less clear than in Example 1, the paradigm case with which we began. The view that morality is involved is weaker still, perhaps disappearing altogether for some people, if we vary the case on all these dimensions at once. Consider Example 6: acting independently, Jack and a large number of unacquainted people set in motion a chain of events that causes a large number of future people who will live in another part of the world from ever having bikes.”

  8. Political Responsibility • Unequal effects on the world’s rich and poor • The relevance of nation-states

  9. Respect for Nature • Respect for nature is opposed to the domination of nature = undermining nature’s autonomy through arbitrary interference • Three reasons to respect nature: (1) Prudential (2) Background condition for a meaningful life (3) Concern for psychological integrity and wholeness

More Related