1 / 15

IRAPing Our Way to Psychological Flexibility

IRAPing Our Way to Psychological Flexibility. Chad E. Drake, Ph.D. Psychological Flexibility. From page 57 of “Understanding Behavior Disorders”:

dewei
Download Presentation

IRAPing Our Way to Psychological Flexibility

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. IRAPing Our Way to Psychological Flexibility Chad E. Drake, Ph.D.

  2. Psychological Flexibility • From page 57 of “Understanding Behavior Disorders”: • “…the ability to experience events fully, consciously, and without defense, and to persist in or change behavior in a given situation in the service of chosen values.”

  3. Anxiety • The presence of fear, worry, nervousness, etc. • Clinical relevance • Traditional focus = reduction • ACT focus = acceptance

  4. Six Core Processes of Psy Flex • Acceptance • Defusion • Present moment awareness • Self-as-context • Values • Committed action

  5. Acceptance • Synonyms: openness, willingness, curiosity, receptivity, etc. • Antonyms: rejection, avoidance, control, etc.

  6. Our Goals • Use the IRAP to measure anxiety in a similar way as has been done with the IAT • Use the IRAP to measure a willingness to have anxiety vs. a desire to control anxiety

  7. Method • Administer questionnaires • AAQ-2, STAI, DTS, DDS, SIAS, etc. • Administer acceptance IRAP and anxiety IRAP • Exclude participants with median latency greater than 2 seconds on either block type

  8. Anxiety IRAP Stimuli

  9. Anxiety IRAP

  10. Acceptance IRAP Stimuli

  11. Acceptance IRAP

  12. Other Results • Still conducting analyses, but… • No obvious correlations between IRAP and self-reports • But still conducting analyses

  13. More Specific Analyses • We divided the sample into roughly equal thirds: high, medium, and low acceptance (AAQ-2 scores) • Results: • No significant differences • Usually high and low acceptance looks similar on the IRAP, an effect seen in other IRAP studies • “other – anxious” trial type was marginally significant – positive D for low acceptance, negative D for high acceptance

  14. Concluding Thoughts/Future Directions • Many variables to consider • Stimulus selection • Scoring procedure • Many potential avenues of exploration

More Related