1 / 18

AFACT IIC Customs EDI Project

Presentation to AFACT Internetworking Implementation Committee (IIC). AFACT IIC Customs EDI Project. Rafiq Abdullah Mark Traas IIC-TWG Technical Advisor. Project Goals. Ultimate goal of project Exchange of Customs EDI data for: Trade Facilitation & Expediting Clearance Enforcement

deacon
Download Presentation

AFACT IIC Customs EDI Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Presentation to AFACT Internetworking Implementation Committee (IIC) AFACT IIC Customs EDI Project Rafiq Abdullah Mark Traas IIC-TWG Technical Advisor

  2. Project Goals • Ultimate goal of project • Exchange of Customs EDI data for: • Trade Facilitation & Expediting Clearance • Enforcement • Statistics • High-level timing goals • Pilot by end 1999 • Live implementation by early 2000

  3. Project Description • Exchange of EDI Information between Customs Administrations • Exchange of Export Declaration (CUSDEC) • Selected Information based on need and confidentiality agreements • May extend to other documents and information in the future Refer AFACT IIC Meeting Documents FOR MORE INFO...

  4. Legal Framework • AFACT IIC • Authority • Implementation Standards & Guidelines • Project Management • Pilot • Bilateral Memorandum of Understanding • Live • Bilateral Agreement with Annexes

  5. Technical Overview • Standards • Developed and reviewed by the IIC-TWG (Technical Working Group) • EDI Standards using EDIFACT • D95B with Asia region guidelines (RECES) • WCO D95B Mapping Guide & APEC Code Harmonization Guide • VAN-to-VAN network over X.400 Refer to IIC-TWG Meeting Documents & Technical Kit FOR MORE INFO...

  6. X.400 Network Overview VAN VAN Customs Customs

  7. Process Overview Local standard export CUSDEC Local standard information Required Steps Optional Steps 1. Map to regional CUSDEC standard 2. Cross-reference from local codes to harmonized codes (using tables) 3. Convert character set, if necessary (using tables where possible) 7. Map to local requirements 6. Cross-reference from harmonized codes to local codes (using tables) 5. Convert character set, if necessary (using tables where possible) Regional standard export CUSDEC Regional standard export CUSDEC 4. Transmitted

  8. Process Overview • Sending Country • Decides what information may be released to other countries • Maps local CUSDEC into region standard prior to transmission • Message Structure and Data Elements (group locations and qualifier codes) • Language and Character Sets (translate non-ASCII to ASCII for descriptive text-type data elements) • Code Set Normalization (tabled cross-reference)

  9. Process Overview • Receiving Country • Receives regional-standard export CUSDEC from sending country • Uses message according to local requirements and bilateral confidentiality agreements • May re-map message for local standards • Message Structure and Data Elements (group locations and qualifier codes) • Language and Character Sets • Code Set Normalization (tabled cross-reference)

  10. Unique Referencing • Unique Consignment Reference (UCR) is required for identifying consignments • EDIFACT Representation UCN Unique Consignment Reference Number Internationally unique number used by Importers / Exporters to identify the consignment Format = Last digit of calendar year + Country Code + Company Identifier + Unique Reference RFF UCN 9MY11800023456789 FOR MORE INFO... WCO Guidelines for unique consignment reference identifier

  11. Current Activity • Customs-to-Customs MOU signed between Korea and Malaysia administrations on 29/12/1999 • Level 3 Pilot message exchange began 19/4/2000 • 3rd JPT meeting held on 10/9/2000 to review progress & issues • VAN-to-VAN MOU signed between Trade*Van (Chinese Taipei) and Dagang*Net (Malaysia) • X.400 testing completed • Level 1 and Level 2 (VAN-to-VAN) testing to follow • Customs-to-Customs MOU presently being reviewed by respective Customs Administrations • VAN-to-VAN MOU between EDI Indonesia and Dagang*Net presently under discussion

  12. Korea - Malaysia Pilot Exchange • Bilateral message exchange between Customs administrations of • Korea • Malaysia • MOU signed on 29/12/1999 • Three Joint Project Team (JPT) meetings • Pilot exchange began 19/4/2000

  13. Korea - Malaysia Pilot Exchange • Weekly exchange of export consignment declaration information (export CUSDEC, EDIFACT D97A) • Selected subset of 3 harmonized tariff codes (6-digit) each direction • Intended for direct shipments only • Selected subset of declaration data • Confidentiality (Customs only)

  14. Korea - Malaysia Pilot Exchange • Selected Data • Place of Loading/Discharge • Departure Date • Total Weight (in KGM) • Reference information (used to build UCI) • Transport details (call sign, voyage number, vessel name) • Consignor and consignee name and address • Line item information (HS code, goods description, quantity measurements)

  15. Korea - Malaysia Pilot Exchange • Analysis of Data Exchange to date Difficulty of matching import/export declarations due to: • All or nearly all shipments are transshipments, with impact on B/L information • B/L information on Malaysia export declaration available later • Vessel identification assigned by port operator in Malaysia (int’l identifiers not provided, except for vessel name) • Voyage identification assigned by port operator in Malaysia (international identifier not provided) • Party identification (e.g. importer name on Korea export declaration and on Malaysia import declaration are not the same, often stated “to the order of”)

  16. Korea - Malaysia Pilot Exchange • Data exchange issues resolved • UN/EDIFACT version • Code qualifiers • Data formats, lengths and decimal usage • Data exchange issues unresolved • Common UCR to link up import/export data • Unavailability of some internationally used identification information • Transshipments (change of B/L)

  17. Korea - Malaysia Pilot Exchange • Conclusions to date • Successful and reliable exchange of export consignment declaration data • No major technical problems encountered • Problems revolved around non-availability of some internationally used data elements • Clear case of a need for internationally adopted use of a Unique Consignment Reference (UCR)

  18. Thank You! Any questions and comments?

More Related