1 / 1

Abstract

Evaluating Construction Methods for an Electrical Transition Compound Andrew Canniff and Christopher O’Connor Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Advised by: Fred Hart & Suzanne LePage. Abstract

darci
Download Presentation

Abstract

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evaluating Construction Methods for an Electrical Transition Compound Andrew Canniff and Christopher O’Connor Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Advised by: Fred Hart & Suzanne LePage • Abstract • We evaluated various construction methods including: Cast in Place Concrete, CMU, ICF, Precast Concrete, and Structural Steel for an Electrical Transition Compound. • Evaluation criteria included cost, construction duration, environmental impact, durability, maintenance, and availability of labor and materials. • A recommendation and an alternative option were submitted to Stantec Consulting Ltd. for the most viable construction options. Construction Methods Results • Cast in Place Concrete • Construction Duration – 24 ½ Weeks • Estimated Cost – $990,457.10 • Description – Formwork • Reinforcing Steel • Mix-Designed Concrete • Pouring Stages • Scaffolding & Bracing • Weatherproofing Acknowledgements We would like to thank the following people for their help and support throughout this project: Suzanne Lepage, Fredrick Hart, Jean Peinsznski, Bill Pay, Joshua Pidgeon, Nate Dimock, Brian Hines, and the rest of Stantec Consulting Ltd. • Objective • Develop evaluation criteria and scoring system, which objectively assesses the five construction methods based upon seven distinct factors. • Select the most viable construction method and an alternative option for the construction of the Transition Compound • Concrete Masonry Unit (CMU) • Construction Duration – 31 Weeks • Estimated Cost – $895,957.10 • Description – CMU Block • Horizontal Bracing • Vertical Reinforcing Steel • Grouting • Scaffolding & Bracing • Weatherproofing Evaluation Criteria Transition Compound • Insulated Concrete Forms (ICF) • Construction Duration – 23 ½ Weeks • Estimated Cost – $898,601.70 • Description – ICF Blocks • Acts as permanent formwork • Mix-Designed Concrete • Pouring Stages • Reinforcing Steel • Scaffolding & Bracing • Weatherproofing • Methods • Research • Review preliminary design documents by Stantec Consulting Ltd. • Design Option Selection • Compile list of all potential construction methods based upon the specifications for the Transition Compound • List of Tasks • Create a list of all necessary tasks for each construction method • Preliminary Construction Schedule • Produce construction schedules using estimated task durations to create a Gantt Chart • Preliminary Cost Estimates • Calculate overall costs of construction for each method using various cost estimating tools • Design Option Evaluation Criteria • Create evaluation criteria to analyze the possible construction methods • Selection of Optimal Design Option • Precast Concrete • Construction Duration – 22 Weeks • Estimated Cost – $1,147,957.10 • Description – Off-site Fabrication • Installation of Panels • Bracing • Weatherproofing Structural Steel Construction Duration – 20 Weeks Estimated Cost – $929,674.85 Description – Off-site Fabrication Installation of Steel Elements Bracing Weatherproofing • Conclusions • Recommendation • Structural Steel • Benefits – Faster Construction Time • Moderate Cost • Accelerates Revenue Production • Alternative Option • Insulated Concrete Forms (ICF) • Benefits – Lower Cost • Moderate Construction Time • Decreased Operation & Maintenance Costs

More Related