150 likes | 164 Views
This study examines the risks of melanoma and other skin cancers in airline pilots and cabin crew. It includes a systematic review and meta-analysis of all published studies to date. The results show a significantly increased risk of melanoma in pilots, while cabin crew have a similar risk to the general population. The study also discusses the potential occupational UV exposure in flight decks and cabins.
E N D
Do airline pilots and cabin crew have raised risks of melanoma and other skin cancers? Systematic review and meta-analysis Kyoko Miura1*, Catherine M Olsen1*, Stephanie Rea1, Jeremy Marsden2, Adèle C Green1,3 1 Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, Queensland, 4006 Australia 2 Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK 3 CRUK Manchester Institute and Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK * KM and CMO contributed equally to this work British Journal of Dermatology. DOI: 10.111/bjd.17586
Introduction What’s already known? • Airline pilots are exposed to cosmic and ultraviolet (UV) radiation in their occupations and cabin crews are occupationally exposed to cosmic radiation • Airline pilots and cabin crews appear to be at significantly increased risk of developing melanoma • Pilots are at increased risk of dying from melanoma
Objective • To establish precise risks of melanoma and keratinocyte cancer (KC) for airline pilots and for cabin crew based on all studies published to date
Methods • Searched Medline, ISI science citation index, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and CINAHL to June 2018 • Inclusion • prospective and retrospective cohort studies • any language • incidence of or mortality from melanoma or KC (i.e. BCC or SCC) in airline pilots or cabin crew compared with the general population • studies with histological confirmation of melanoma • for mortality, record linkage (ICD codes), death registries, death certificates, and physician records
Methods continued • Multiple reports from the same population or subpopulation • included the report with the longest follow-up or the most comprehensive data • Data extraction • Two reviewers independently abstracted data • study design, location, years of data collection, sources and definition of cohort, definition of exposure (e.g. flying hours, radiation dose), No. of cases, person-year of follow-up, age of the study population, variables used for statistical adjustment, point estimates (odds ratio, hazard ratio or standardized incidence or mortality ratio) and 95% CIs • Quality assessment – Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment
Methods: Data synthesis & analysis • DerSimonian and Laird: a random-effects model • Pooled standardised incidence ratios (pSIR) and pooled standardised mortality ratios (pSMR) with 95% CI • Statistical heterogeneity among studies – Q-statistic inconsistencies were quantified using the I2 statistic. • Sensitivity analyses – excluding each study in turn to examine the effect on the pooled estimate. • Publication bias – visual inspection of funnel plots + Begg’s & Egger’s tests • STATA (version 15)
Results • Identified 5866 articles, assessed 44 full-text, 12 studies included in quantitative synthesis • Published between 1990–2017 • 3 studies were based in North America, 5 in Europe, 4 were multinational • retrospective cohort = 10 studies • retrospective & prospective cohort = 2 studies • Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (ranges 0–9) • 7 studies = scored 7 • 4 studies = scored 6 • 1 study = scored 5 • higher score = better quality
Results: Melanoma • Pilots • incidence: 7 studies • pooled SIR (pSIR) 2.03 (95% CI 1.71–2.40) • no evidence of heterogeneity (I2=0.0%, p=0.84); no evidence of publication bias (Beggp=0.76; Egger p=0.66) • mortality: 3 studies • pSMR 1.99 (95% CI 1.17–3.40) • no evidence of heterogeneity (I2=41.6%, p=0.18); no evidence of publication bias (Beggp=0.60; Egger p=0.75) • Cabin crew • incidence: 2 studies reported • pSIR 2.12 (95% CI 1.71–2.62) • no evidence of heterogeneity (I2=0.0%, p=0.55) • mortality: 1 study • SMR 1.18 (95% CI 0.73–1.89)
Results: Keratinocyte cancer (KC) • Pilots Incidence • BCC (1 study) SIR 2.46 (95% CI 1.88–3.16) • KC (4 studies) pSIR 1.86 (95% CI 1.54–2.25) • No evidence of heterogeneity (I2=1.4%, p=0.39); no evidence of publication bias (Beggp=0.73; Egger p=0.16) Mortality • KC (1 study) SMR 0.93 (95% CI 0.15–3.04) • Cabin crew Incidence • BCC (1 study) SIR 2.33 (95% CI 1.77–3.01) • KC (1 study) SIR 1.97 (95% CI 1.25–2.96) Mortality • KC (1 study) SMR 8.01 (95% CI 2.98–17.33) KC: Keratinocyte cancer
Discussion Airline pilots Compared with the general population: • risk of melanoma & keratinocyte skin cancers ≈ ↑ 2 x • risk of dying from melanoma ≈ ↑ 2 x, but not KC Cabin crew • Risk of melanoma & keratinocyte skin cancers ≈ ↑ 2 x • Risk of dying from melanoma was similar to the general population
Discussion continued • UV-B from the sun – main environmental cause of melanoma & skin cancer • Occupational UV exposure • Cabins • Flight deck • UV-A levels in flight deck in the 20th century – unknown • almost all reviewed evidence is out-of-date (studied in the mid- to late 20th century) → limitations • Cosmic radiation • elevated in pilots and cabin crew but below hazardous level → unlikely the cause • UV-B radiation is not detectable or not increased above ground level values in modern airline cabins and flight decks
Discussion continued • Circadian rhythm disruption – carcinogenic • melanoma + skin cancer from short-haul routes → unlikely the cause • Recreational UV-exposure among pilots & cabin crews • during recreational activities including during stopovers • absence of direct evidence but cannot be ruled out
ConclusionsWhat does this study add? • Risk of melanoma and other skin cancer is approximately doubled in airline pilots and cabin crew compared with the population; occupational exposure to ultraviolet radiation is unlikely to explain the raised risk • Causal roles of occupational exposure to ionising radiation, and recreational exposure to ultraviolet radiation, are plausible but there is little supporting evidence • Almost all relevant evidence is out-of-date and is restricted to the Northern Hemisphere: research is needed that better reflects the occupational environment and recreational behaviour of current pilots and cabin crews
Research team S. Rea K. Miura C. Olsen A. Green J. Marsden