1 / 14

< MUPUS> Status

MUPUS Team Meeting. < MUPUS> Status. Graz, 24/25 Oct 2013. PEN inflight calibration 4. 14 inflight calibration points between -107°C and -91°C 3 PEN sensors (No 2,7,10) showed jump (< 0.5 K) in R-T characteristic after THC power calibration in PC#12

cricket
Download Presentation

< MUPUS> Status

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MUPUS Team Meeting <MUPUS> Status Graz, 24/25 Oct 2013

  2. PEN inflight calibration 4 • 14 inflight calibration points between -107°C and -91°C • 3 PEN sensors (No 2,7,10) showed jump (< 0.5 K) in R-T characteristic after THC power calibration in PC#12 • No changes between PC#12 and PC#13 => correction possible • No active heating before FSS !

  3. MUPUS PEN Inflight Calibration 5 • R0(-100°C) and TCR(-100°C) from 16 inflight calibration points between -107°C and -91°C • Corresponds to TCR ~ 0.0022 when evaluated with standard T0=0°C

  4. (prelimenary) PEN uncertainty budget 1-Sigma • Uncertainty(@T=-200°C, k=2) = 3.2 K • uncertainties of reference resistors R100, R20 • uncertainty of h/k-2 Pt-100 (Class B, incl. line resistance correction ~ 1K / 31/2) • Precision(@T=-200°C, k=2) = 2.6 K • Uncertainty due to linear extrapolation • Uncertainty due to neglection of quadratic term (2-3 10-7 K-2, FS measurement) • Uncertainty due to imperfect wire correction (assumed 20% of nominal Rw) • Uncertainty due to assumption of homogeneous PEN temperature (assumed 0.5 K / 31/2) • Uncertainty due to electronics nonlinearity (FS, 0.25 K / 31/2) • Uncertainty due to electronics noise (0.016 K, FM cruise checkouts)

  5. TM inflight calibration 2 6-25 µ 13-15 µ TM sensors lost sensitivity (but stable during cruise)!

  6. TM inflight calibration 4 6-25 µm 13-15 µm Extrapolation to TV test conditions: S/S0 ~ 0.72 (6-25 µm) S/S0 ~ 0.86 (13-15 µm)

  7. Depth Sensor FM FS • DS values stable since 2006 (no data earlier) • Slight dependence on balcony temperature (similar for FS) • Precision (Repeatibility, FS) ~ 75 DU(~ 3.5 mm)

  8. ANC-M (accelerometer) FM FS • ANC-M Offsets stable since PC#4 (Nov 2006) • Slight dependence on board (EBox) temperature ~ -1 mV/K • Noise stable at 0.6-0.7 mV

  9. MUPUS FM Status Summary • All MUPUS hardware fully operational when entering hibernation • ComDPU working only at ½ nominal speed (known since 2006) • No indications for h/w changes during cruise with one exception: • 3 PENEL sensors showed jump in R0 (~0.5-1 K) after (very low power) THC heating • Calibration problems exist: • PENEL: extrapolation due to short baseline of inflight calibration points • TM: significant sensitivity loss already pre-launch

  10. MUPUS RM Status • EQM DPU killed in Nov 2012 • Stupid handling error by the project manager ! • Replaced by last FM-series (reserve) DPU stored at DLR • RM functional • BUT: new PENEL-FS problem • Occured after insertion tests with SESAME at Philae GRM • Strange: everything ok during all functional tests including the last one before switch-off • No valid measurements anymore when red tag jointer connecting PENEL electrical to structural GND close • Everything ok when red tag jointer open !

  11. Additional slides

  12. MUPUS PEN Inflight Calibration 1 PENEL, T=-50°C • Inflight calibration needed to cover low T expected for the comet • Method: • Use Pt-100 in the holder as reference • Assume that PEN tube and holder at the same temperature in equilibrium (before PENEL switched on, justified by TV test with PEN FS) • Interpolate resistance backward in time to start of PENEL preheating (equilibrium) • => Ri=Ri(Tref), i=1,2,…,16 Pt-100 PEN1 PEN16 TCU-MUPUS-DD

  13. MUPUS PEN Inflight Calibration 3Backward Extrapolation PENEL heat wave PENEL heat wave Nearly linear increase of R during first 30 min. Calibration (holder) Pt-100 • Backward extrapolation gives reasonable R(T) point ! (random) uncertainty estimate ~ 0.5 K (neglecting deviations from homogeneity assumption) + systematic uncertainty of Tholder ~ 0.8 K

  14. MUPUS TM Calibration 1 Thermopile principle: T-differences between sensor and object => Uth TSens must be measured separately ! Object radiation Blackbody radiation Housing radiation

More Related