pivot iv vs oral antibiotics for pneumonia n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 26

PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 95 Views
  • Uploaded on

PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia. Journal Club April 2012 Chris Edwards. Introduction. What is your clinical practise with moderate to severe pneumonia? “48 hours IVs and then home on orals if culture negative.” But this doesn’t make sense …. Plan. PICO Search Result

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia' - colton


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
pivot iv vs oral antibiotics for pneumonia

PIVOT: IV vs Oral antibiotics for Pneumonia

Journal Club April 2012

Chris Edwards

introduction
Introduction

What is your clinical practise with moderate to severe pneumonia?

“48 hours IVs and then home on orals if culture negative.”

But this doesn’t make sense ….

slide3
Plan

PICO

Search

Result

Trial Analysis

Summary

Discussion

slide4
PICO

P- children with pneumonia

I – Oral antibiotics

C – IV antibiotics

O- time to recovery/time in hospital

search
Search

Medline

“pneumonia AND antibiotics”

RCTs

Children (0-18 years)

English language

~80 hits

Then looked for developed world(few) rather than developing world (lots)

result
Result

Comparison of oral amoxicillin and intravenous benzylpenicillin for community acquired pneumonia in children(PIVOT trial): a multicentre pragmatic randomised controlled equivalence trial

M Atkinson, M Lakhanpaul, A Smyth, H Vyas, V Weston, J Sithole, V Owen, K Halliday, H Sammons, J Crane, N Guntupalli, L Walton, T Ninan, A Morjaria, T Stephenson

Thorax 2007;62:1102–1106. doi: 10.1136/thx.2006.074906

analysis1
Analysis

“A study was undertaken to ascertain whether therapeutic equivalence exists for treatment of community acquired pneumonia by the oral and IV route.”

  • Population: Children, but no upper age limit was specified.
  • Intervention: IV v Oral antibiotics
  • Outcomes: “therapeutic equivalence” taken as:
    • Primary outcome measure was time from randomisation until the temperature was <38°C for 24 continuous hours and oxygen requirement had ceased
    • Secondary outcomes:
      • included time in hospital,
      • complications (empyema, readmission, further courses of antibiotics),
      • duration of oxygen requirement
      • time to resolution of illness.
analysis2
Analysis

Yes

“A block randomisation sequence stratified by centre was produced using a random number generator. The sequence was accessed via the internet, therefore allowing concealment of allocation.

Children were randomly assigned to oral amoxicillin (chosen in preference to oral penicillin owing to the superior absorption and palatability) or IV benzyl penicillin.”

So not double blind.

analysis3
Analysis

Yes….

analysis5
Analysis

No.

Could have cannulated all, given placebo IV to the oral group and oral placebo to the IV group…

analysis8
Analysis

Children in the IV group were changed to oral amoxicillin on discharge or sooner if the clinical team considered their improvement warranted this.

Both groups completed a 1-week course of antibiotics in total.

IV group more likely to require another antibiotic / rescue medication.

?Does this mean there was an inherent difference in the two groups?

analysis10
Analysis
  • Time to temperature less than 38.5
  • Length of time in oxygen
  • Time to discharge
  • Time to resolution of symptoms
  • Number of complications
analysis13
Analysis
  • Time in hospital and oxygen requirement
    • “The median length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the oral group than in the IV group (1.77 days (25th–75th centile 1.2–2.0) and 2.1 days (25th–75th centile 1.8–2.9),respectively, p,0.001). We also calculated the median of the differences and this was found to be 0.60 days (0.15–1.13) (IV– oral). “
  • Oxygen
    • During admission, 18/103 children (17.5%) in the IV group and 28/100 children (28%) in the oral group required oxygen (p=0.07). The duration of oxygen requirement was significantly longer in the IV group than in the oral group (median 20.5 vs 11.0 hours, p=0.04).
  • Children randomised to IV treatment received a median of 6 doses (25th–75th centile 4.7–7.5) of IV benzyl penicillin before conversion to oral amoxicillin.
analysis14
Analysis

For the primary outcome measure, all p values are for equivalence. Therefore, a p value of ,0.05 indicates that the null hypothesis (a difference of .20% exists between the two treatments) has been disproved.

analysis15
Analysis

Yes – Nottingham isn’t that far away (especially now they widened the M1).

analysis16
Analysis
  • ? Chest X-ray resolution?
  • ?Longer follow up?
  • ?Lung function?
    • Probably wouldn’t make a difference to the decision re: treatment.
analysis17
Analysis
  • The change in practise maybe to start oral amoxicillin in AAU and keep overnight. If remains well, then home,

vs

  • IV for 48 hours then home. So the benefit probably does outweigh the costs.
summary
Summary

Oral antibiotics appear to be equivalent to IV antibiotics for pneumonia

Pts on IV antibiotics appear to have more complications

discussion
Discussion

Would you encourage the team to change practice in AAU?