1 / 11

U.S. Decadal Survey Process

U.S. Decadal Survey Process Disclaimer: I am one of many participants; it’s complicated; and others involved should speak up . Committee Members: Roger Blandford , chair Lynne Hillenbrand, executive officer 21 other members divided among subcommittees

clark
Download Presentation

U.S. Decadal Survey Process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. U.S. Decadal Survey Process Disclaimer: I am one of many participants; it’s complicated; andothers involved should speak up. Committee Members: Roger Blandford, chair Lynne Hillenbrand, executive officer 21 other members divided among subcommittees Subcommittee on Science – Martha Haynes, Vice Chair Subcommittee on State of the Profession – John Huchra, Vice Chair Subcommittee on Programs – Marcia Rieke, Vice Chair This is the Executive Committee

  2. Subcommittee on Science: Martha Haynes, vice-chair Lars Bildsten John Carlstrom Fiona Harrison Timothy Heckman Jonathan Lunine JuriToomre Scott Tremaine

  3. Subcommittee on State of the Profession: John Huchra, vice-chair Debra Elmegreen Joshua Frieman Robert Kennicut Dan McCammon Neil de Grasse Tyson

  4. Subcommittee on Programs: Marcia Rieke, vice-chair Steven Battel Claire Max Steven Ritz Michael Turner Paul Vanden Bout Thomas Young There will be four Program Prioritization Panels that are being chosen now. Program prioritization will occur after science prioritization and considerations of state of the field have been put forward.

  5. Two opportunities for input have been announced Notices of Interest – due January 14 Titles and contact persons are now listed on the web Will be used for planning; committee will request further information Science white papers – due February15 Will be made public

  6. Notices of Interest with Possible Connection to MWA Reionization and Dark Ages Radio Experiment – Backer Lunar Radio Array – Lazio Lunar Low-Frequency Radio Array for Cosmology (NRC study) – Burns Square Kilometer Array – Cordes The North America Array – Ulvestad Long Wavelength Array – Taylor Detectors and Arrays for Long Wavelength Astrophysics – Bock Radio Cosmology Telescope – Morales Radio Adaptive Optics Seeing Correction – Lamb Radio Sky Surveys Project - Bower

  7. Reionization and Dark Ages Radar Experiment Institutions and spokespersons UC Berkeley – Don Backer Massachusetts Institute of Technology – Jackie Hewitt National Radio Astronomy Observatory – Rich Bradley Center for Astrophysics – Lincoln Greenhill Haystack Observatory – Colin Lonsdale UC Los Angeles – Steve Furlanetto U. Washington – Miguel Morales U. Pennsylvania – J. Agierre Australia National University – Frank Briggs Raman Research Institute – Ravi Subrahmanian

  8. Lunar Radio Array Naval Research Laboratory MIT NASA Goddard Space Flight Center NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory University of Colorado California Institute of Technology Harvard University National Radio Astronomy Observatory Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory U. California, Berkeley U. California, Los Angeles University of New Mexico Virginia Polytechnic Institute

  9. SKA California Institute of Technology Cornell University Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Haystack Observatory Jet Propulsion Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology National Astronomy and Ionosphere Center National Radio Astronomy Observatory Naval Research Laboratory SETI Institute University of California, Berkeley University of Illinois University of New Mexico University of Wisconsin

  10. SCIENCE WHITE PAPERS What I know from word of mouth – others please comment EoR #1 – Astrophysics of Early Structure Formation – Furlanetto EoR #2 – Csomology from Hydrogen Structure – Loeb Solar Physics – Greenhill & Kasper Low Frequency Astrophysics – Philstrom Several (5 or 6?) – SKA science topics – Cordesand US SKA Cons. Pulsars - ??

  11. PROCESS (18 months) Science panels will evaluate science white papers Committee will invite some NoI submitters to provide further information Science and state of profession will be assessed Discipline panels will rank projects Committee will make final ranking

More Related