1 / 36

A PNAS Direct Submission (2009)

A PNAS Direct Submission (2009). Desplats Paper. Test if α -synuclein pathology involves direct neuron-to-neuron transmission of α -synuclein aggregates via endocytosis Overall hypothesis:

christmas
Download Presentation

A PNAS Direct Submission (2009)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A PNAS Direct Submission (2009)

  2. Desplats Paper • Test if α-synuclein pathology involves direct neuron-to-neuron transmission of α-synuclein aggregates via endocytosis Overall hypothesis: • If α-synuclein aggregates can be spread by direct neuron-to-neuron transmission, then we would expect accumulation of α-synuclein aggregates in the uninfected neurons.

  3. Figure 1 • Figure 1A and 1B Hypothesis: If extracellularα-synuclein can be taken up by the mouse cortical neuronal stem cells (MCNSCs), thenα-synuclein accumulation will be detected in the MCNSCs via Western blot and fluorescent microscopy.

  4. MCNSCs MCNSCs E15-E18 C57/BL6 Polyornithine/laminin-coated plate Alexa-Fluor-488-α-synuclein

  5. Western Blotting www.askabiologist.asu.edu

  6. Figure 1(A): Results • MCNSCs capable of taking up extracellular α-synuclein ? Conclusions?

  7. Confocal Microscopy http://www.lucid-tech.com/client_images/catalog19974/pages/images/vivascopy/graphic_scopy.gif

  8. Figure 1(B): Results • MCNSCs took up extracellular Alexa-Fluor-488-labeled α-synuclein Conclusions?

  9. Figure 1(C) • Purpose: To determine whether α-synuclein released from neuronal cells can be directly transferred to MCNSCs • Hypothesis: If α-synuclein is released by the neuronal cells, then we would expect to see uptake of α-synuclein in the MCNSCs via immunofluoresence.

  10. Figure 1(C) Rat B103 + α-synuclein MCNSCs-GFP Acceptor Cells Donor Cells

  11. Immunofluorescence α-synuclein

  12. Figure 1(C): Results • 47% of MCNSCs showed patterns of cytoplasmic accumulation of α-synuclein Neuronal Cells + MCNSC Neuronal Cells MCNSC Conclusions?

  13. Figure 2 • Purpose: To analyze the propagation of α-synuclein to transplanted stem cells in vivo. • Figure 2 A-C Hypothesis: If a-syn can be transmitted directly from host to grafted neuronal stem cells, thenα-synuclein will be detected in MCNSCs grafted into transgenic mice via immunofluoresence.

  14. Immunostaining and TSA HRP HRP Secondary Antibody α-syn tyramide red α-syn Adopted from www.abcam.com

  15. Figure 2 • Injected GFP-labeled MCNSCs into the hippocampus of transgenic mice expressing human α-synuclein. Transgenic (expresses human α-synuclein via Thy-1 promoter)

  16. Figure 2 (A-C): Results • ≈2.5% of MCNSCs showed human α-synuclein immunoreactivity in transgenic mice after 1 week Hippocampus 1 Week Later

  17. Figure 2 (D-E): Results • When MCNSCs not injected into α-synuclein transgenic mice, no immunoreactivity (D) • MCNSCs showed no human α-synuclein immunoreactivity in non-transgenic mice (E) Controls

  18. Figure 2 (F): Results • 15% of α-synuclein-positive MCNSCs developed LBs in cytoplasm after 4 weeks 4 Weeks Later α-synuclein transgenic α-synuclein transgenic + MCSNCs MCNSCs

  19. Figure 2 (G): Results 15% 2.5% Comments?

  20. Figure 2 • Suggests that α-synuclein pathology can be transmitted directly from host to grafted cells

  21. Figure 3 • Purpose: To further characterize cell-to-cell transmission of α-synuclein using an in vitro coculturemodel • Figure 3(A) Hypothesis: If myc-tagged α-synuclein from donor cells can be released and transmitted to SH-SY5Y acceptor cells, thenα-synuclein will be detected in the donor cells via immunofluorescence.

  22. Figure 3 SH-SY5Y SH-SY5Y SH-SY5Y + α-synuclein myc Q myc myc myc Q Q myc Q Q Acceptor Cells Donor Cells

  23. Figure 3(A): Results • After 24 hrs, myc-tagged α-synuclein from donor cells was detected in acceptor cells • Formation of inclusion bodies in some acceptors cells Conclusions?

  24. Figure 3(A): Results • After 24 hrs, myc-tagged α-synuclein from donor cells was detected in acceptor cells • Formation of inclusion bodies in some acceptors cells Conclusions?

  25. Figure 3(B): Results • Inclusion body formation occurs with prolonged transmission of α-synuclein Conclusions?

  26. Figure 3(C): Results • ~ ½ of the acceptor cells displayed ubiquitin immunoreactivity Conclusions?

  27. Figure 3(D) • Purpose: • To examine the involvement of donor cell membrane leakage in transmission of α-synuclein • Lactate dehydrogenase release (LDH) assay • SH-SY5Y cells overexpressing β-galatosidase, α-synuclein, and α-synuclein-myc

  28. Figure 3(D): Results • Cell-to-cell transmission occurs without cellular membrane leakage Conclusions?

  29. Supplemental Fig. S2A • Purpose: To determine if cell-cell contact is required for inclusion body formation • SH-SY5Y cells incubated in medium from SH-SY5Y cells expressing myc-tagged α-synuclein. • Hypothesis: If cell-cell contact is not required for inclusion body formation, then inclusion bodies will be detected in the cells in which α-synuclein was taken up.

  30. Results: Fig. S2A • α-synuclein inclusion bodies formed in the neuronal stem cells Conclusions?

  31. Supplemental Fig. S3A • Purpose: To determine if transmission of α-synucleinaggregates is dependent on endocytosis • Dynamin-1 K44A expressed in acceptor cells (blocks endocytic formation) • Donor cells cocultured with acceptor cells • Hypothesis: If transmission of α-synucleinaggregates is dependent on endocytosis, then we would detect a reduction in the uptake of α-synucleinin the cells expressing dynamin-1 K44A.

  32. Results: Fig. S3A • Transmission of α-synuclein significantly reduced in acceptor cells Conclusions?

  33. Figure 4 • Purpose: To determine the role of quality control failure in deposition of α-synuclein • Hypothesis: If protein quality control systems are impaired due to being in the presence of MG132 proteosomal inhibitor or Baf A1 lysosomal inhibitor, then we would expect increased accumulation of transmitted α-synuclein in the cells.

  34. Figure 4 SH-SY5Y SH-SY5Y Baf A1 myc-α-synuclein myc-α-synuclein

  35. Figure 4 SH-SY5Y SH-SY5Y MG132 myc-α-synuclein myc-α-synuclein

  36. Figure 4(A-B): Results • Increased α-synuclein accumulation by lysosomal failure but no effect on proteosomal inhibition Conclusions?

More Related