1 / 33

PAST TURKISH BUDGETS-BUDGET FORMATS USED

PAST TURKISH BUDGETS-BUDGET FORMATS USED. Starts with the second half of the 19th century. Budgets up to the Reform Period, previously under the laws of Sharia, and later made ​​on the basis of sovereign decrees. For the first time,budget right was adopted with 1876 Constitution.

chavez
Download Presentation

PAST TURKISH BUDGETS-BUDGET FORMATS USED

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PAST TURKISH BUDGETS-BUDGET FORMATS USED

  2. Starts with the second half of the 19th century. Budgets up to the Reform Period, previously under the laws of Sharia, and later made ​​on the basis of sovereign decrees. For the first time,budget right was adopted with 1876 Constitution. History of Budget in Turkey

  3. The first budget of the Republic of Turkey is the budget of 1924. • In our country, modern budget right has occured with the law numbered 1050, named ‘Muhasebe-i Umumiye’ in 1927. • After 1927 appliance of classical budgeting has continued but an innovation have been made about categorization of beginning from this date. After 1950 budget expenditures are seperated as current and investment expenditures. It was the first time an economic categorization have been made. History of Budget in Turkey

  4. New arrangements has came with 1961 Constitution for budgeting.With this constitution,way of judical control has opened to tax,expenditure and budget law. Since 1964, dual classification of budget expenditures was subjected to consisting of three parts by being current ınvestment and transfer expenditure History of Budget in Turkey

  5. Until1973,budgetexhibitedthatclassicalbudgetsystem. • Expenditures = Revenues • Govermentmust be in themicrolevel. • Budgetdeficitandbudgetsurplus • No connectiontotheamount of services • Takescareonlyfinancialpart. • Efficiency of services ClassicalBudgetSystem

  6. 1)With classical budget,determinable that what goverment purchased how much they spent. Traditions are important for determination of expenses. 2)Political factors plays a major role. 3)It does not enable to making the optional programs and making the comparison between them. Review

  7. 4)İnformation gathering and raporting systems. 5) Classic budget has not been established relationship with the plan. 6)Spendings tends to show a steady increase in classical budget. 7) strict control through accounting constituted that essence of classical budget.There is no governance of efficency and effectiveness. Review

  8. Comparison between classical budget and programe base budget

  9. Planning, Programming, and Budgeting System (PPBS) is in effect an integration of a number of techniques in a planning and budgeting process for identifying, costing and assigning a complexity of resources for establishing priorities and strategies in a major program and for forecasting costs, expenditure and achievements within the immediate financial year or over a longer period. Program Based Budget System

  10. In Turkey, this system was used since 1973 because of the deficiencies of the classical budget system. Also the change and development of economic and fiscal policies led to the application of the program based budget system. But in 2006 with the code no 5018, the use of this system is ended.

  11. PPB System’s main elements are the program structure, programanalysis withlong-term program and financial plan. In particular emphasis on the analysis of the program for the realization of this matter fully; aims of the Government possible alternatives the total cost estimate of the program for each year, the expected benefits from the goals were determined for each year  estimates of alternatives, and the remaining ambiguous points should be brought disclosure and written.

  12. PPBS, consists of four major parts.  These are: classification justification granting an allowance  system analysis

  13. With Program Based Budgeting, we can not determine the aim of government expenditure. We can only determine which commodities government buy and how much government pay to them. The lack of determining aims, programming services was blocked. Reasons of faılıng program basedbudget

  14. Turkey’s budget techniques didn’t improve well. Turkey tried to make budgets with past experiences. Because of not using new techniques, new information collection systems didn’t improve in PBB. Reasons of faılıng program basedbudget

  15. Between PBB and planning relation didn’t occure when Turkey uses the system. In PBB if one good is purchased in one year, this good will be calculated each year after the current year. Removing the good from budget has no place in this budget system. Reasons of faılıng program basedbudget

  16. Performance Budgeting System in Turkey

  17. came into operation in Turkey in December 2003 by the enactment of the Public Financial Management and Control Law The term “performance-based budgeting” is used in the PFMC Law Characteristics

  18. Three broad types of institutions are defined in the PFMC Law: public administrationswithin the scope of central government, social security institutions, local administrations. Budgeting categories in the PFMC Law

  19. Three broad categories of budgets: • central government budget • general budget • special budget • regulatory and supervisory agency budget • social security institution budget • local administration budget Budgeting categories in the PFMC Law

  20. strategic plans performance programmes budgets accountability reports complementary tool, called analytical budget classification. Performance budgeting tools

  21. medium and long-term objectives, • core values and policies, • goals and priorities, • performance indicators of public administrations as well as the methods followed to achieve those and resource allocation. • Strategic plans cover five-year periods in Turkey. Strategic Plans

  22. performance targets and performance indicators of a public administration related to the programme period; activities to be executed, and the resource requirement so as to achieve the targets; information on the related administration. required for the public administrations covers one year and are prepared each year Performance programmes

  23. Multi-year budget framework: The appropriations of the first year are established by the Central Government Budget Law (CGB Law) The appropriations of the following two years are set as indicators by the administrations and not legalised Budgets

  24. The classification of expenditure budgets is based on four categories: institutional, functional, financing, economical classification. Analytical budget classification

  25. Reports include the following elements: • the resources used, and the reasons for any deviation regarding the budget targets and realisations; • financial information comprising information regarding the activities of associations, institutions and organisations aided through assets and liabilities; • information on activities and performance information performed as per strategic plans and performance programmes; and • general information on the related administration. • Public administrations and spending units are required to issue accountability reports each year (PFMC Law). Accountability reports

  26. Regulatory administrations • Undersecretariat of State Planning Organization (SPO)- Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı (DPT) • Ministry of Finance (MoF) – Maliye Bakanlığı (MB) • Implementing administrations • All public administrations covered in the PFMC Law including the SPO and the MoF are implementing administrations for performance budgeting Actors in the performance budgeting system

  27. The performance budgeting process can be illustrated from the perspective of both the regulatory and the implementing aspects. • The budgeting process begins with the publication of the medium-term programme and ends with the publication of the law on the central government budget (CGB) in the Official Gazette. • The medium-term programme includes basic macro policies, principles, and economic figures as targets and indicators in line with the development plans and strategic plans of the institutions and the requirements of general economic conditions. The performance budgeting process

  28. Appropriations are prepared using the fourth level of the economical classification, but they are legalised in the detail of the second level. Budget flexibilities

  29. After the approval of the CGB Law, the administrations under the general budget prepare their detailed expenditure programmes (DEPs), which are on a monthly basis. The DEPs are then approved by the MoF on a quarterly basis and for the second level of economical classification. • The appropriations of the administrations are released quarterly by the MoF based on the approved DEPs. Detailed expenditure programmes

  30. Internal control, co-ordination of which is the responsibility of the Strategy Development Departments, is a complementary tool for performance budgeting. • External audit, which is also a complementary tool, is an ex post audit performed by the Turkish Court of Accounts within the framework of the accountability of administrations under general government. Internal control and external audit

  31. The budget system of Turkey follows incremental budgeting. • Accounting is on an accrual basis in Turkey; on the other hand, budgeting is on a cash basis, resulting in a dual system for budgeting and accounting. • Current and capital expenditures are separated; the former is the responsibility of the MoF and the latter is the responsibility of the SPO. Review of performance budgeting in Turkey

  32. Ebru Tercan 2008431062 Erdi Çangar 2007431012 Evrim Yıldırım 2007431050 M.Görkem Cüneytoğlu 2007431010 Thank youforlistening

More Related