1 / 8

80 likes | 289 Views

Boundary Layer Meteorology Lecture 4. Turbulent Fluxes Energy Cascades Turbulence closures TKE Budgets. Turbulent Fluxes. Terminology: Stationary Turbulence is constant is independent of translation along the time axis.

Download Presentation
## Boundary Layer Meteorology Lecture 4

**An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation**
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.
Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only.
Download presentation by click this link.
While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

**Boundary Layer Meteorology Lecture 4**• Turbulent Fluxes • Energy Cascades • Turbulence closures • TKE Budgets**Turbulent Fluxes**• Terminology: • Stationary Turbulence is constant is independent of translation along the time axis. • Homogeneous Turbulence is independent of translation along any spatial axis. • Isotropic Turbulence is statistically independent of rotation, reflection or translation**Energy Cascades**• Kolmogorov Theory: • Existence of equilibrium range of scales of motion in which the average properties are determined uniquely by the fluid’s viscosity and the total dissipation. k = v • Existence of an inertial subrange within the equilibrium range, but removed from the scales where viscous forces are important, where only inertial transfer of energy is important. 1/ls << << 1/k**Turbulence Closures**• Equation 2.42 has unknowns like . How do we solve for it? • Note that the problem arises from Reynolds Averaging. Why do we need Reynolds averaging? Because we don’t have enough computing power to span the whole inertial subrange, bridging the scales where viscosity matters to the scales we care about (10s of meters to a few kilometers in the vertical). As Garratt points out, we’d need a trillion grid points to do this explicitly. Can we fudge it?**First order closures:**• Can be as simple as assuming u’s’ = K ds/dx, with constant K • Or as complicated as prescribing a vertical and time dependence of K (which will also vary depending on what’s being transported), where K might depend on the local shear and on the Richardson number.**One-and-a-half oder closure**• In this case we acknowedge that an eddy diffusivity (K) ought to depend on the kinetic energy of the eddy part of the flow; so we should maybe predict the TKE for each location. Further simplifications are introduced to make this possible (see chapter 8).**Second-order closure**• Maybe “if a crude assumption for nth order moments predicts (n-1)th moments adequately, perhaps a similar assumption for (n+1)th moments will predict nth moments just as well” (Lumley & Khajeh-Nouri, 1974, quoted by Garratt). • uiujuk terms usually parameterized by assuming down-gradient diffusion of uiuj terms. • Dissipation usually parameterized in terms of TKE and a large-eddy length scale (probably at least a little arbitrary).**TKE budget equation**• De/Dt = S + B + T+ DS = shear production; B = bouyancy flux; T = transport + pressure work; D = dissipation • See Bretherton Notes 3.

More Related