1 / 47

Low Cost Narrow Bandwidth Synchronous Streaming Video From the Classroom to the Remote Student s Desktop

cedric
Download Presentation

Low Cost Narrow Bandwidth Synchronous Streaming Video From the Classroom to the Remote Student s Desktop

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. Low Cost Narrow Bandwidth Synchronous Streaming Video From the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop Eric Flower and Stacey Sawa University of Hawaii-West Oahu

    2. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 2 Our Local Problem

    3. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 3 Our Global Problem

    4. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 4 Table of Contents Introduction/Purpose: Slides 5 11 System Design: Slides 12 18 Methodology: Slides 19 22 Results: Slides 23 31 Methodological Problems: Slides 32 33 Classroom Management: Slides 34 36 Secondary Observations: Slides 37 43 Future Research: Slides 44 46

    5. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 5 Internet Streaming An Internet data transfer technique that allows the user to see and hear audio and video files without lengthy download times; the host or source streams small packets of information over the Internet to the user, who can access the content as it is received See sample video and a discussion of our project at: http://socrates.uhwo.hawaii.edu/BusAd/Flower/video/uhthisweekcredits.html

    6. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 6 Video Was Delivered Directly to the Students Desktop We did not broadcast to studios or computer labs where students would have to gather to participate in a site-to-site modeldelivery was directly to the students desktop at home or in an office

    7. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 7

    8. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 8 Purpose of the Study: 1 To identify levels of preparation and support (equipment, software, staffing, training, facilities, infrastructure, etc.) necessary to produce and distribute good quality narrow bandwidth (384Kbps or less) streaming video to students in their home or at their offices

    9. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 9 Purpose of the Study: 2 To see if we could design a low cost Internet streaming video system without a large capital equipment investment, heavy infrastructure requirements, or a large technical support staff

    10. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 10 Purpose of the Study: 3 To see if we could design a system on a cart to make it portable To see if classes could be broadcast from any campus classroom or conference room and not be tied to a studio, lab, or other special purpose facility

    11. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 11 Purpose of the Study: 4 To make some preliminary determination on the effectiveness of synchronous streaming of classroom-based instruction when compared to the traditional classroom setting

    12. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 12 Streaming Video Process

    13. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 13 Software We Used We used apps from RealNetworks.com to encode and serve our classroom-based streaming video RealProducer to capture and encode video RealServer to distribute the video RealPlayer and RealOne Player to view streaming video

    14. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 14 Video Encoding Rates

    15. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 15 Hardware/Production System

    16. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 16 Distribution System

    17. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 17 Equipment Cart

    18. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 18

    19. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 19 Methodology 1 Using the streaming video system we designed and built, we taught four semesters of Computer Skills for Administrators with some students in the classroom and other students at home or in their offices participating synchronously Course is an elective with no pre-requisites offered in the Professional Studies Division

    20. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 20 Methodology 2 We taught the class four times between 2001 and 2004 Over that period, there were 41 students in the classroom and 29 online Each semester, both groups had the same class presentations, readings, and assignments, wrote the same reports, took the same tests, and worked on similar projects This course is an elective course with no pre-requisites. Students were mainly from the Professional Studies Division (Business Administration and Public Administration). They had a mix of dialup, cable, DSL, and office LAN connections.This course is an elective course with no pre-requisites. Students were mainly from the Professional Studies Division (Business Administration and Public Administration). They had a mix of dialup, cable, DSL, and office LAN connections.

    21. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 21 Methodology 3 Both groups could watch the archived class video files In a retrospective study, we compared student course grade scores for each group (in-class vs. remote) Used a t-test for unequal variances Ho:u1 = u2 (Null hypothesis: means of the two groups are equal) Ha:u1 <> u2 (Alternative hypothesis: means of the two groups are not equal)

    22. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 22 Grade Score Components Testing throughout the semester: 45% Final exam: 20% Class participation/ Quality circle participation: 10% Group presentation/ Group presentation contribution: 15% Critical review of Visions: How Science Will Revolutionize the 21st Century by Michio Kaku: 10%

    23. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 23 Results 1 We found that off-the-shelf hardware and software were adequate to produce good quality narrow bandwidth (384Kbps or less) streaming video Significant investments in broadcast studios may not be necessary where high production values are not an essential part of the instructional process

    24. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 24 Encoding Rates and File Size Triple stream video files encoded at 56Kbps, 150Kbps, and 256Kbps use 3.9 megabytes of storage per minute Stream to the viewer at the highest reliable connection, typically 34, 150, or 225Kbps This multistream provides a good balance of sound and picture quality and targets dial-up, LANs, and broadband In 2004 we upped the top rate to 384 Kbps encoded and 350Kbps received

    25. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 25 Connections: LAN/Broadband Local Area Network (LAN) and broadband connections (cable, DSL) are clearly better Video encoded at 256Kbps is received at 225Kbps Video encoded at 384Kbps is received at 350Kbps Sound and video are both good Acceptable for motion, detail, and close-up work

    26. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 26 Connections: 56K Dial-up 1 Streaming video encoded for 56Kbps dial-up modems is received at 34Kbps Sound is good Picture is not nearly as good as higher speed streams Video is choppy and there may be frequent rebuffering if there is network congestion More like a slide show than a motion picture

    27. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 27 Connections: 56K Dial-up 2 May not be acceptable for classes or demos involving motion, detail, or close-up work May be acceptable for discussion-based classes with little movement May be acceptable for large image, large font PowerPoint presentations with little or no animation

    28. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 28 Results 2 Marginal operating costs were relatively small and limited mainly to the salary of the technician operating the camera and performing post-production work It was possible to stream from virtually any classroom or conference room on campus with the mobile cart

    29. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 29 Results 3 To determine effectiveness of synchronous classroom-based streaming video, we performed a t-test for unequal variances on the course grade scores for the two groups Ho:u1 = u2 (Null hypothesis: means of the two groups are equal) Ha:u1 <> u2 (Alternative hypothesis: means of the two groups are not equal)

    30. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 30 Results 4 Analysis of the student course grade scores for each group (in-class vs. remote) shows a strong similarity of the means Using the t-test for unequal variances, the p-value was 0.84; this provides a strong statistical conclusion that the means are not different

    31. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 31 Results 5 Low cost narrow bandwidth synchronous streaming of classroom-based instruction appears to be as effective as the traditional classroom environment in this instance

    32. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 32 Methodological/Data Problems 1 Groups are not random Groups are self-selected by enrollment in a classroom or online section Neighbor Island students have no choice; they must enroll in an online section There is no information about the students aside from their group and their final course grade score

    33. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 33 Methodological/Data Problems 2 There is no information about computing ability or knowledge at the beginning of the class There were no pre- and post- tests Not blind; instructor knows who is in each group

    34. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 34 Classroom Management 1 Instructors teaching style and course content must be amenable to this delivery method if it is to be successful Instructors dont need to change their classroom methods very much to succeed with Internet streaming video broadcasting; long periods of training appear to be unnecessary

    35. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 35 Classroom Management 2 Preparation, rehearsal, and timely distribution of supporting material are critical to successful streaming video presentations

    36. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 36 Classroom Management 3 Faculty workload increases in this environment, but not nearly as much as in an asynchronous text or multimedia-based online teaching environment Time spent on preparation and production is less with streaming video, though post-production work may be more, depending on the faculty members decisions on how much to do after class

    37. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 37 Secondary Observations 1 Students watched archived classes they missed due to illness, travel, work, etc. Students reviewed or intensively studied classes or portions they did not understand when the material was originally presented

    38. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 38 Secondary Observations 2 Instructor could review class files to correct errors in presentations or to add supplementary material to a web-based errata file Instructor could review class files to examine their methods for teaching effectiveness and make improvements where necessary

    39. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 39 Secondary Observations 3 Class files could be reviewed for teaching effectiveness when making decisions relating to contract renewal, tenure, post-tenure review, and professional development

    40. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 40 Secondary Observations 4 Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (.smil) files may be used to create, or contribute to, learning modules of any length to improve instruction .SMIL file-based learning modules may be used to make material available to other classes or groups

    41. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 41 Secondary Observations 5 Students want more classes offered via streaming video if they have access to fast connections like Oceanic Cables RoadRunner service

    42. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 42 Secondary Observations 6 System was reliable There were very few incidents of hardware failure, software failure, links to server, or server failure Slow connections, network congestion, and lack of Quality of Service (issues of network packet priority) were problems for some dial-up students

    43. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 43 Secondary Observations 7 Network bandwidth is the critical variable in streaming video viewer satisfaction Faster connections support notably better viewer experiences No amount of preparation can overcome problems associated with a slow connection or network congestion Viewers will blame you or the technology if their picture is bad

    44. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 44 Future Research 1 More rigorous study and analysis of classroom-based synchronous streaming video needs to be performed to confirm these preliminary findings

    45. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 45 Future Research 2 Students thought viewing archived streaming video class files on demand (asynchronously) could be as effective from an instructional viewpoint as participating in the live class (synchronously), provided they could then interact with the instructor via e-mail, chat, or videoconferencing Asynchronous delivery with a scheduled online class meeting component could increase access

    46. Flower and Sawa, Streaming Video from the Classroom to the Remote Students Desktop 46 Future Research 3 Archived files could be viewed when network traffic was low, or, archived files could be distributed on CDs which would eliminate delivery problems associated with slow network connections or network congestionthis could be a boon to less developed areas with weak infrastructures

    47. Thanks for reading! Eric Flower and Stacey Sawa University of Hawaii-West Oahu

More Related