1 / 1

LEED ND, Socionatural Hybrids & Emerging Urban Planning Contests

Gary Martin, Geography & Environmental Studies, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.

cedric
Download Presentation

LEED ND, Socionatural Hybrids & Emerging Urban Planning Contests

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Gary Martin, Geography & Environmental Studies, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. The U.S. Green Building Council’s suite of building rating tools is ten years old this year. The newest tool in the LEED suite, LEED ND, was released in the U.S. in March, 2010. LEED ND reflects the understanding that sustainability is about relationships between neighborhoods and the rest of the world, especially in or near cities. However, scaling up from individual structures to neighborhoods complicates urban planning. How does LEED ND fit into emerging planning paradigms and what are the implications for planners and developers in North American cities? To answer these questions, this poster explores the difference between houses, homes and neighborhoods using a combination of Castree (2001) and social nature, political ecology as elaborated by Swyngedouw & Heynan (2003), and Whatmore’s (2002) concept of hybridity as a conceptual framework. Figure 1: A House Figure 1 features a house as a material structure – a shelter from weather and society. To simplify, this house is in the suburbs where North Americans build around one million houses like this per year. Note that there are no people in this house so there are no exchanges of energy or materials with the rest of the world, as in Figure 2. Figure 2: A Home Figure 2 is the same house but with people. House, inhabitants and the surrounding non-human environment have combined into a socionatural hybrid, i.e. a home. Notice the similarity to a nucleus with exchanges of material and energy through membrane/walls. A home interacts with the environment differently than a house. For example, if a house is aimed at the sun it will exchange energy a certain way, causing the inhabitants to adjust interior temperatures. Or, situate a house close to jobs and shopping and the inhabitants will put less carbon into the atmosphere. This is why GBCs and builders want to alter how builders construct housing, and this is where LEED ND is intended to assist in the combination of houses and other buildings into neighbourhoods. CO2 CO2 Heat CO2 $ $ Energy Water Waste Water Transportation to work, school and shopping LEED ND, Socionatural Hybrids & Emerging Urban Planning Contests CLIMATE CHANGE & WEATHER Figure 3: A Neighborhood POLITICS & GLOBAL ECONOMY Electronic world Figure 3 plants the home in a neighbourhood. Complexity grows exponentially in the homes as hybrids interact with politics, economics, the local to global environment, as well as consumer culture and its habits. All of the homes are inhabited by people with webs and patterns of exchange and interaction with each other and their surroundings. Exchanges occur across multiple scales, compounding local to global environmental impacts. CO2 CO2 CO2 Heat CO2 CO2 $ $ Electricity Water Social capital & community networks Transportation to work, school and shopping Groundwater degradation, encroachment on farmland, pollution of air and soils, etc. Resilience & passive survivability Consumer culture (i.e., large lots & houses) & effects on global environment Figure 4: A Neighborhood as a Socionatural Hybrid CLIMATE CHANGE & WEATHER Who built it? For whom? Where? Why? Figure 4 adds more layers of complexity, such as social equity and social capital, both of which are essential for sustainable neighborhoods. This diagram also includes consumer culture, another social variable, and the associated environmental impacts in a capitalist world market economy, as well as the effects of history and public ambivalence about environmental issues. The concepts of social nature, political ecology and hybridity help to highlight interactions between buildings, humans and the non-human world which result in pollution and climate change. NIMBY and public ignorance POLITICS & GLOBAL ECONOMY Electronic world CO2 CO2 CO2 Heat CO2 CO2 Building & energy codes $ $ Electricity Water Social capital & community networks Resilience & passive survivability Groundwater egradation, encroachment on farmland, pollution of air and soils, etc. Transportation to work school and shopping Legal System (e.g. real estate & property law, inheritance, taxation, municipal zoning and codes,ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS greenwashing Out-dated infrastructure Historical ecological negligence Consumer culture (i.e., large lots & houses full of stuff) & effects on global environment Figure 1 features a house as an impermeable shelter. Figure 4 features a neighborhood as a group of nuclei with permeable membranes through which people conduct exchanges with the socionatural world. The structure in Figure 1 is neither sustainable nor unsustainable: it is inert and neutral. Figure 4 demonstrates that the buildings, infrastructure and public spaces specified by LEED ND are necessary but not sufficient components of sustainable neighborhoods. Every arrow in Figure 4 symbolizes human decisions, actions, relationships, networks and impacts over time, which are at least as important as the physical structure for fostering or impeding neighborhood sustainability. Virtually all of these actions and impacts occur “through the membrane” as symbolized by the arrows, and most of the arrows indicate sources of contest now or in the near future between homes, planners, developers, builders and the global environment. Planners and developers can no longer ignore the hybrid nature of neighborhoods and urban sustainability. References: Castree, N. (2001). ‘Socializing Nature: Theory, practice and politics’, in Noel Castree and Bruce Braun, eds., Social Nature: Theory. Practice, and Politics. Malden: Blackwell. Pp. 1-19; Swyngedouw, E., and Nik Heynan (2003). ‘Urban political ecology, justice and the politics of scale’, in Antipode, 35(5), pp. 898-918; Whatmore, S. (2002). Hybrid geographies: Natures, cultures, spaces. London: Sage. I thank Brad Robinson, friend, fellow builder and visionary, for the idea of a home as a nucleus.

More Related