1 / 47

DRAFT BUDGET FOR 2009 - 2010

DRAFT BUDGET FOR 2009 - 2010. Guiding Principles. . . . Maintaining our district commitment to class size limits of 30 students in core subjects Maintaining our district special education service levels Minimizing the impact on school programs and school level services.

cate
Download Presentation

DRAFT BUDGET FOR 2009 - 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DRAFT • BUDGET • FOR • 2009 - 2010

  2. Guiding Principles. . . . • Maintaining our district commitment to class size limits of 30 students in core subjects • Maintaining our district special education service levels • Minimizing the impact on school programs and school level services

  3. Guiding Principles. . . . continued • Avoiding staff layoffs • Supporting the implementation of the long term (five year) plan • Presenting a “draft” balanced Budget

  4. Budget Timeline. . . . . • The district provides projected enrolment by February 15th each year to the Ministry • Ministry announces estimated funding for the next school year by March 15th • Staff prepare draft budget based on projections • Staff present draft balanced budget to Finance and Planning – Committee of the Whole April 8, 2009

  5. Budget Timeline. . . . . continued • Staff Present to Employee Groups, Media, DPAC, PAC’s – April 16, 2009 • Deadline for written submission to the Committee of the Whole – April 22, 2009 • Budget finalized and presented for adoption at the Public Board meeting – Monday April 27, 2009

  6. Internal Budget Process: • AOC members provide confirmed budget increases and other priorities for consideration • Revenues are estimated based on projected enrolment • Staffing budgets are adjusted in relation to the enrolment change • Budget shortfall is divided amongst the departments based on their % of the total budget

  7. Internal Budget Process . . . . (continued): • Department managers provide suggested budget reductions to meet their % of the total budget shortfall • AOC discuss options presented and determine which reductions have the least negative impact on guiding principles • Budget details are presented to the Board for review and further input

  8. Budget Challenges: • 2008-2009 Budget Shortfall ($59,276) • 2009-2010 Projected Enrolment Decline – 480 FTE @ $5,851 = $2,808,480 • Revenue/Inflation/Entitlement & Transportation Challenges - $1,433,314 • Total Budget Challenge - $4,301,070

  9. Preliminary funding 2008-2009 Vs. 2009-2010: • Overall Funding Equal to 2008-2009 • Enrolment Decline up $617,149 • Salary Differential down ($127,964) • Labour Settlement Funding up $2,161,748 • (Labour Funding reflects wage & benefit increases) • and . . . . . . . . • Funding Protection of $348,288

  10. Revenue Budget Breakdown: • Ministry $118,350,795 • Other Revenue $3,335,256 • (Local Education Agreements, International Student Program, Rentals, Leases, Investment Income and Miscellaneous Grants) • Total Projected Revenue $121,686,051

  11. Expense Budget Breakdown: • Salaries $89,562,934 • Benefits $18,446,889 • Supplies and Services $13,216,310 • First Nations Targeted $588,320 • Total Projected Expenses $121,814,453

  12. What does an enrolment decline of 480.0 FTE students mean to the district? 480 FTE students is: • Equivalent to 2 or more elementary schools • Equivalent to 2 of our rural secondary schools • Equivalent to approximately 13 fewer students at each of our 38 elementary schools. • Thirteen fewer students at an Elementary School is a difficult enrolment decline to manage leaving the district limited opportunities to find the savings.

  13. Wage and Benefit cost drivers that do not vary directly with enrolment: • Principals, School Clerical & Custodians • Facilities & Maintenance • Transportation • District Administration & Governance

  14. Supply and Service cost drivers that do not vary with enrolment (i.e.): • Utilities and Telephone $3,066,074 • Facility Repair & Maintenance $2,870,295 • Transportation (Busing) $1,445,047 • Administration & Governance $733,584

  15. How have we achieved a balanced budget? • Increased @KOOL revenues $ 288,825 • Decreased Salaries 2,495,407 • Decreased Benefits 491,372 • Decreased Supplies and Services 1,025,466 • Total Budget Challenge $ 4,301,070

  16. How have we achieved a balanced budget? • Reduced classroom teachers in relation to decline • Tightened student/teacher ratio at secondary • Reduced non-enrolling teachers • Reorganized Distance Learning model • Transferred replacement “Operating” budgets to Local Capital

  17. How have we achieved a balanced budget? . . . . . continued • Reduced supply budgets at elementary • Eliminated two bus routes • 3% Administrative Reduction – all administrative departments including School Based Administration • (2 Principal/Vice Principal positions)

  18. In Summary – this proposed budget has been developed to deliver on the following guiding principles: • Maintain our district commitment to class size limits of 30 students in core subjects • Minimize the impact on existing school programs • Maintain district special education service levels

  19. In Summary. . . . . continued • Minimize staff layoffs (Staff reductions through attrition or retirement) • The Budget supports the implementation of the districts long term (five year) plan • The draft 2009-2010 Budget is balanced as presented

  20. The Budget is balanced as presented. Administration was asked to provide supplementary information relating to transportation and facility utilization: • Information on courtesy riders • Information on charging all students who ride our buses including eliminating the reimbursement of city transit passes for in-town students • Comprehensive (Long Term Plan) report on district facilities

  21. Courtesy Riders – Issues: • This change would impact approximately 25 non-school district riders and an estimated 850-1,000 district riders • Significant logistical challenges to implement • Potential revenue $156,000 – $249,600 ?

  22. All Bus Riders and Transit Pass Users – Issues: • This change would impact approximately 25 non-school district riders and an estimated 4,000 district riders • Significant logistical challenges to implement • Potential revenue $500,000 +?

  23. Facilities Report - Issues: • Declining enrolment is creating very inefficient schools • Declining enrolment is creating challenges for the delivery of educational services • Excess capacity is inefficient and takes resources away from the classroom • The formal facilities report is due June 2009

  24. The End

More Related