1 / 45

An upper limit to the masses of stars

An upper limit to the masses of stars. Donald F. Figer STScI Collaborators: Sungsoo Kim (KHU) Paco Najarro (CSIC) Rolf Kudritzki (UH) Mark Morris (UCLA) Mike Rich (UCLA). Arches Cluster Illustration. Outline. Introduction to the problem Observations Analysis Violators? Conclusions.

cassia
Download Presentation

An upper limit to the masses of stars

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. An upper limit to the masses of stars Donald F. Figer STScI Collaborators: Sungsoo Kim (KHU) Paco Najarro (CSIC) Rolf Kudritzki (UH) Mark Morris (UCLA) Mike Rich (UCLA) Arches Cluster Illustration

  2. Outline • Introduction to the problem • Observations • Analysis • Violators? • Conclusions

  3. 1. Introduction

  4. An upper mass limit has been elusive • There is no accepted upper mass limit for stars. • Theory: incomplete understanding of star formation/destruction. • accretion may be inhibited by opacity to radiation pressure/winds • formation may be aided by collisions of protostellar clumps • destruction may be due to pulsational instability • Observation: incompleteness in surveying massive stars in the Galaxy. • the most massive stars known have M~150 M • most known clusters are not massive enough

  5. 1941, ApJ, 94, 537 Radial pulsations and an upper limit Also see Eddington (1927, MNRAS, 87, 539)

  6. Upper mass limit: theoretical predictions Stothers & Simon (1970)

  7. Upper mass limit: theoretical predictions

  8. Upper mass limit: observation

  9. The initial mass function: a tutorial • Stars generally form with a frequency that decreases with increasing mass for masses greater than ~1 M: • Stars with M>150 M can only be observed in clusters with total stellar mass >104 M. • This requirement limits the potential sample of stellar clusters that can constrain the upper mass limit to only a few in the Galaxy.

  10. The initial mass function: observations G=-1.35 G=-1.35 1-120 M Salpeter 1955 Kroupa 2002

  11. 2. Observations

  12. Upper mass limit: an observational test • Target sample must satisfy many criteria. • massive enough to populate massive bins • young enough to be pre-supernova phase • old enough to be free of natal molecular material • close enough to discern individual stars • at known distance • coeval enough to constitute a single event • of a known age • Number of "expected" massive stars given by extrapolating observed initial mass function.

  13. Lick 3-m (1995)

  14. Keck 10-m (1998)

  15. HST (1999)

  16. VLT (2003)

  17. Galactic Center Clusters too old (~4 Myr)

  18. 3. Analysis

  19. Arches Cluster CMD Figer et al. 1999, ApJ, 525, 750

  20. Luminosity function

  21. Stellar evolution models WNL O WNE WCE WO WCL SN Meynet, Maeder et al. 1994, A&AS, 103, 97

  22. NICMOS 1.87 mm image of Arches Cluster No WNE or WC! Figer et al. 2002, ApJ, 581, 258

  23. enhanced Nitrogen Arches stars: WN9 stars NIII HeI HeI NIII NIII HeII HeI/HI Figer et al. 2002, ApJ, 581, 258

  24. Arches stars: O stars 68 HI HeI 27 Figer et al. 2002, ApJ, 581, 258

  25. Arches stars: quantitative spectroscopy NIII NIII NIII Najarro et al. 2004

  26. Age through nitrogen abundances Najarro, Figer, Hillier, & Kudritzki 2004, ApJ, 611, L105

  27. Mass vs. magnitude for t=2 Myr

  28. Initial mass function

  29. Arches Cluster mass function: confirmation HST•NICMOS VLT•NAOS•CONICA Flat Mass Function in the Arches Cluster Stolte et al. 2003

  30. Monte Carlo simulation • Simulate 100,000 model clusters, each with 39 stars in four highest mass bins. • Repeat for two IMF slopes: G=-1.35 and -0.90. • Repeat for IMF cutoffs: 130, 150, 175, 200 M. • Assign ages: = tCL± s = (2.0-2.5) ± 0.3 Myr. • Apply evolution models to determine apparent magnitudes. • Assign extinction: = AK,CL±s = 3.1 ± 0.3. • Assign photometric error: s=0.2. • Transform "observed" magnitudes into initial masses assuming random cluster age (2.0-2.5 Myr) and AK=3.1. • Estimate N(NM>130 M)=0.

  31. Simulated effects of errors true initial mass function inferred initial mass function

  32. Results of Monte Carlo simulation

  33. 4. Violators?

  34. Figer et al. 1999, ApJ, 525, 759

  35. tracks by Langer Figer et al. 1998, ApJ, 506, 384 Is the Pistol Star "too" massive?

  36. Two Violators in the Quintuplet Cluster? Pistol Star and #362 have ~ same mass. Pistol Star Star #362 Figer et al. 1999, ApJ, 525, 759 Geballe et al. 2000, ApJ, 530, 97

  37. LBV 1806-20 • Claim • 1-7 LPistol* • 150-1000 M⊙ • Primary uncertainties • distance • temperature • singularity SGR LBV

  38. LBV 1806-20 is a binary? double lines Figer, Najarro, Kudritzki 2004, ApJ, 610, L109

  39. Does R136 have a cutoff? • Massey & Hunter (1998) claim no upper mass cutoff. • Weidner & Kroupa (2004) claim a cutoff of 150 M. • deficit of 10 stars with M>150 M for Mc~50,000 M. • deficit of 4 stars with M>150 M for Mc~20,000 M. • Metallicity in LMC is less than in Arches: ZLMC~Z/3. • Upper mass cutoff to IMF is roughly the same over a factor of three in metallicity. Weidner & Kroupa 2004, MNRAS, 348, 187

  40. Conclusions • The Arches Cluster is the only known cluster in the Galaxy that can be used to test for an upper mass cutoff to the stellar initial mass function. • The upper mass cutoff in the Arches Cluster is ~150 M. • The upper mass cutoff may be invariant over a range of a factor of three in metallicity.

  41. The next step: search the Galaxy! • Find massive stellar cluster candidates • 2MASS • Spitzer (GLIMPSE) • Target for intensive observation • NICMOS/HST • Chandra • NIRSPEC/Keck • Phoenix/Gemini (30 hours) • IRMOS/KPNO 4-m • EMIR/GTC • VLA (~100 hours)

  42. 130 New Galactic Clusters from 2MASS Candidate 2MASS Clusters

  43. Massive Young Clusters in X-rays Arches and Quintuplet Clusters in X-rays Chandra Law & Yusef-Zadeh 2003

  44. Massive Young Clusters in Radio Arches and Quintuplet Clusters in Radio VLA Lang et al. 2001

More Related