1 / 34

19-PMT Electroluminescent High Pressure Xenon TPC

19-PMT Electroluminescent High Pressure Xenon TPC. Azriel Goldschmidt, LBNL. Institutions/People Involved (so far). LBNL: D. Nygren, H. Spieler, A. Goldschmidt, R. Lafever, T. Weber, D. Hogan, J. Reiner + others… LLNL: A. Bernstein, M. Heffner + others… Texas A&M: J. White + students

carbuckle
Download Presentation

19-PMT Electroluminescent High Pressure Xenon TPC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 19-PMT Electroluminescent High Pressure Xenon TPC Azriel Goldschmidt, LBNL

  2. Institutions/People Involved (so far) • LBNL: D. Nygren, H. Spieler, A. Goldschmidt, R. Lafever, T. Weber, D. Hogan, J. Reiner + others… • LLNL: A. Bernstein, M. Heffner + others… • Texas A&M: J. White + students • and collaboration with NEXT

  3. Overview • Energy resolution in HPXe • Electroluminescent gain • Goals of 19-PMT (10 liter, 1kg@20Atm) system • Gas System / Cycle • Field Cage / Light Pipe • PMTs/DAQ • Calibration sources / methods / Simulations

  4. Intrinsic energy resolution E/E = 2.35  (FW/Q)1/2 • F  Fano factor: F = 0.15 (HPXe) • W  Average energy per ion pair: W ~ 25 eV • Q  Energy release in decay of 136Xe: ~2500 keV E/E = 2.8 x 10-3 FWHM (HPXe) N = Q/W ~100,000 primary electrons N =(FN)1/2~120 electrons rms!

  5. Xenon: Strong dependence of energy resolution on density! Ionization signal only For  >0.55 g/cm3, energy resolution deteriorates rapidly

  6. What E-drift is required for best energy resolution? • An important goal of 19-PMT system is to verify/check this dependency 1.3% FWHM whenextrapolated to 2.5 MeV With 50 kV/meter 0.3% FWHM whenextrapolated to 2.5 MeV Would require 400 kV/meter !

  7. Gain and noise Impose a requirement: (noise + fluctuations)  120 e— Need gain G with very low noise/fluctuations! Uncorrelated fluctuations, add in quadrature: • = ((F + G)N)1/2 F  constraint due to fixed energy deposit G  noise/fluctuations of detection process

  8. Electro-Luminescence (EL) is the key Coimbra seminal work… • Physics process generates ionization signal • Electrons drift in low electric field region • Electrons enter a high electric field region • Electrons gain energy, excite xenon: 8.32 eV • Xenon radiates VUV (175 nm, 7.5 eV) • Electron starts over, gaining energy again • Linear growth of signal with voltage • Photon generation up to ~1000/e, but no ionization • No exponential growth  fluctuations are very small (< 1 e- RMS)

  9. Virtues of Electro-Luminescence in HPXe • Linearity of gain versus pressure, HV • Immune to microphonics (level of displacements?) • Absence of positive ion space charge • Absence of ageing, quenching of signal • Isotropic signal dispersion in space • Trigger, energy, and tracking functions accomplished with optical detectors

  10. Fluctuations & Total signal at Q-value Q/W = N = 1 x 105 Uncorrelated fluctuations:  = ((F + G)N)1/2 For G ≤ F = 0.15  npe ≥ 10 (per primary electron)  Npe  1 x 106 One million photoelectrons! However: Npe is spread out over >100 PMTs and 10 - 100 µs No dynamic range problem

  11. Electroluminescence in 4.5 bar of Xenon Corresponds to 5 x 10-3 FWHM When naively extrapolated toQbb of 2.5 MeV (compare with the Fano limited 2.8 x 10-3 FWHM best case)

  12. Separated Function TPC with Electroluminescence Readout Plane A - position D. Nygren Readout Plane B - energy Electroluminescent Layer

  13. 19 PMT HPXe TPC: 10 liter @ 20 Atm Argon Purge circuit Pressure / Vacuum vessel Xenon purification circuit Graphics by Robin Lafever Goals: 1. E/E resolution (662 keV) 2. explore sensitivity of energy resolution to drift E-field

  14. In this version only light sensing on the “far end” (energy) of the EL plane

  15. Options for Electroluminescence production • Two parallel meshes: • Produces a “too much” light at 20 Atm • Requires ~micron tolerances for gain uniformity • Single wire plane: • EL in region up to ~8R • “Ultra” wire with radius uniformity <1 micronprovides built-in gain uniformity • Light gain ~ 1100*p(Atm)*R(cm) • P=20, R=0.0150, Gain=330 • Light produced “in front” of the wire • Wire displacements? • Other: Wire plane and near field wires…(issues with tolerances and gain uniformity) J. White

  16. Gas System Turbo pump Vacuum valve High pressure valve GettersSAES MicroTorr MC50SAES MicroTorr MC190 Argon Recirculating pumpPW 2070 Dewar for Xenontransfer to chamber To roughing pump Xenon container &Dewar for Recapture Robin Lafever, LBNL

  17. Gas Cycle • Vacuum pump to ~10-7 Torr • Let Argon in • Re-circulate Argon thru getters and flush • Vacuum pump again • Transfer Xenon by freezing in chamber reservoir • Let warm up and achieve high pressure • Re-circulate Xenon • Perform experiments/calibration/measurements • Recapture Xenon by freezing container

  18. DAQ for 19-PMT system • Total energy measurement requires summing of all channels • Signal duration depends on track orientation (~5 – 100 microseconds)  integrate over time bins • Each channel must be calibrated (ADC slope + offset vs. light impinging on PMT)  array of calibration LEDs • Digitization must be accurate to single photoelectron (minimum bin determined by ADC channel profile) • Max signal for tracks parallel to luminescent gain plane • Use 100 MS/s 16-bit ADC with 13-bit resolution

  19. Simulation of 662 keV’s on axisTracks and Spatial Distribution 662 keV g’s Thru 0.5’ wall

  20. 662 keV g’s Thru 0.5’ wall

  21. Simulation 662 keV gammas on axis • Reflectivity walls 75% • Endcaps do not reflect • EL Gain ~1000 • 15% PMT Q.E. • All topologies • Energy is sum of PEs • Fano factor=0 • ~300,000 PEs/662 keV • 0.7% FWHM (0.4% is just stats) • Widening of resolution is due to radial dependence on the light collection (solid angle)

  22. Diagonal low energy gamma ray source • Simulation with 75% reflectivity on walls • Collimated source inside the pressure vessel • Use time of primary to determine Z and thus Radius 122 keV g photoelectrons 10% Z (cm) Z (cm)

  23. Status of 19-PMT system • HP Vessel: in place, loan from LLNL • Gas System: design nearly complete • Procuring parts (valves, pipe, etc) • Recirculation pump and getters already in • TPC “guts”: design nearly complete • PMT/DAQ: • 24 PMTs , testing starts in ~weeks • Struck digitizers on order

  24. Eso es todo por hoy!

  25. This treatment uses 41-pin Conflat 17156-01-CF 17156-01-CF

  26. HV Grids Field Cage Precision-ground ceramic spacers HV Grids PMT array Ceramic rods HV Grid plane Teflon mount plate Teflon HV Grid supply

  27. High Voltage Grids

  28. Field Cage

More Related