520 likes | 770 Views
Goals. Understand the process of NBSDevelop skills to communicate with future parents about NBSIdentify resources to provide expectant parents. Objectives. Review history of NBSDiscuss how we decide what to screen forList current diseases screened forExplain expanded NBS by tandem mass spectros
E N D
1. Newborn Screeningin Texas August 17, 2010
V. Reid Sutton
vrsutton@texaschildrens.org
2. Goals Understand the process of NBS
Develop skills to communicate with future parents about NBS
Identify resources to provide expectant parents
3. Objectives Review history of NBS
Discuss how we decide what to screen for
List current diseases screened for
Explain expanded NBS by tandem mass spectroscopy (MS/MS)
Provide guidance for prenatal discussion of NBS
Review samples of ACT/FACT sheets
Share resources for parents
4. History 1963 – Robert Guthrie publishes “A simple phenylalanine method for detecting phenylketonuria in large populations of newborn infants.” [Pediatrics 1963 32:338-43]
Method used blood spots on filter paper
High phenylalanine levels inhibit bacterial growth on plate
5. Early Development of Other Tests Bacterial inhibition developed for galactosemia and other diseases
Other conditions added
New methods (fluorimetric) developed
6. Tenets for NBS The disorders screened for have been historically selected because:
the disorder occurs with significant frequency
an inexpensive and reliable method of testing exists
an effective treatment/intervention exists
if untreated, the baby may die or develop severe mental retardation
the affected baby may appear normal at birth
7. How Disorders are Selected?
8. How Disorders are Selected!
9. How Disorders are Selected: State-by-state
Legislatures pass law on “minimum required screening”
Most funded by per-newborn charge back to hospital
10. Who Screens for Disorders? Single Central State Lab (e.g. Texas)
Multiple state lab sites (e.g. CA)
Collaborative lab (e.g. New England NBS Program)
Referred to other states (e.g. AK done by WA)
Contracted out to private lab (e.g. ND done by Neogen, Inc.)
11. ACMG/March of Dimes Recommendations 9 Organic acidemias (OA)
5 Fatty acid oxidation disorders (FAOD)
6 Amino acid disorders (AA)
3 Hemoglobinopathies
Galactosemia
Congenital hypothyroidism
Congenital Adrenal hyperplasia
Biotinidase deficiency
CF
Hearing
12. Incidence of Selected Metabolic Disorders MCAD (FAOD)
PKU (AA)
Hypothyroidism
CAH
Biotinidase
MSUD (AA)
Galactosemia
Homocystinuria
Cumulative incidence
1/20,000
1/14,000
1/3,000
1/19,000
1/60,000
1/230,000
1/50,000
1/340,000
1/4000
13. Goals - Texas NBS How many Newborn screens?
Each baby born in Texas receives two newborn screening tests
within the first 72 hours of life (preferably after 36 hours of age and 24 hours after the first feeding), or before hospital discharge
second test at one to two weeks of age
All infants testing outside of normal limits for a newborn screening disorder receive prompt and appropriate confirmatory testing
All individuals diagnosed with newborn screening disorders are maintained on appropriate medical therapy
14. Inborn Errors of Metabolism Tandem Mass Spectroscopy & Enzyme Assay
15. History of Tandem Mass Spectroscopy (MS) Investigation of Reye syndrome & carnitine disorders in mid-1980s
Multiple methods required
Enzymology
Radio-immunoassay
Gas Chromotography/Mass Spectroscopy
Single method needed
Assays free/total & acylcarnitine levels
16. Tandem MS Methodology(Why is it called Tandem MS?)
17. Tandem MS & Newborn Screening 1990s – measurement of phenylalanine by tandem MS
First methodology to permit huge expansion of NSB diseases with one test
Mid-1990s – development of methods for NBS by Tandem MS
18. Amino Acid Disorders Detected by Expanded NBS Argininemia
Argininosuccinate lyase deficiency
Citrullinemia
Maple syrup urine disease (MSUD)
Phenylketonuria (PKU)
Tyrosinemia
Homocystinuria
19. Organic Acidopathies Detected by Tandem MS Methylmalonic acidemia
Propionic acidemia
Isovaleric acidemia
Glutaric acidemia type I
HMG-CoA lyase deficiency
Malonic aciduria
ß-Ketothiolase deficiency
20. Fatty Acid Oxidation Disorders Detected by Tandem MS Carnitine palmitoyltransferase II deficiency
Medium chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (MCAD)
LCHAD
VLCHAD
Multiple acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (MADD or GA type II)
Trifunctional protein deficiency
Carnitine uptake defect
21. Specifics of Tandem MS Newborn Screening All done on a single blood spot card
Single prep for all tests done
Highly automated
1 ˝ minutes per sample for all analytes
Cost ~ $10 per analysis
Reported in 5-7 days
22. Uh-oh! Biochemical phenotypes without clinical phenotypes? Short chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (SCAD) deficiency
3-methylcrotonyl-CoA carboxylase (3-MCC) deficiency
2-methylbutyryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (2-MBAD) [Hmong]
23. Change in Tenets for Newborn Screening Old Tenets – One test per disease
Significant frequency
Cheap & reliable test
Effective treatment
Severe if untreated
Look normal at birth
New Tenets - Single testing method
+/- frequency
Cheap & reliable test
Effective treatment or
Early diagnosis & recurrence risk counseling
24. Benefits – Medium Chain Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase (MCAD)
Pre-screening
25-33% die at presentation
25-33% of survivors have long-term neurologic disability
25. After NC Newborn Screening No missed diagnoses known
No deaths in treated MCAD patients
No neurological problems in those followed up to 3 years
No episodes of hypoglycemia (<50 mg/dl) in treated individuals
[McCandless SE, et al. ASHG 2000, abstract #3]
26. Cost-Effectiveness of NBS (Wisconsin Program) MCAD only
Analysis of cost of death + neurological impairment vs. NBS
Cost effective if under $13.05 per test
Benefit of screening other disorders not counted
[J Pediatr 2002. 141(4):524-531]
27. Enzyme Assays (Fluorimetric) Galactosemia (GALT enzyme assay)
Heat inactivates enzyme – therefore in Texas cutoff values float
Most abnormal are Duarte and do not need treatment
TX – abnormal > reflex DNA testing
Biotinidase deficiency
< 10 % normal activity needs treatment
28. Follow-up testing Simply repeating the NBS is NOT appropriate.
This is a screening test so there is a small false negative rate
The sensitivity for many disorders drops beyond the newborn period
29. Endocrine Disorders
30. Congenital Hypothyroidism Detected using radioimmunoassay (RIA) of T4 – method published in 1975
High false-positive rate in low-birth weight and sick infants
Follow-up with TSH & T4
31. 21-Hydroxylase Deficiency (CAH) Detected using radioimmunoassay (RIA) of 17-hydroxyprogesterone
May be missed on 1st newborn screen; non-classic CAH may be missed
Follow-up with electrolytes and 17-hydroxyprogesterone
32. Sickle Cell Disease
33. Hemoglobinopathies Detected by hemoglobin electrophoresis
Will detect Hgb S, C, and thalassemias
Affected by transfusion
Reflex confirmatory testing for SS by targeted DNA mutation analysis in Texas
34. Cystic Fibrosis
35. Cystic Fibrosis Immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT)
Texas uses IRT/IRT/DNA
Must have two abnormal IRTs to proceed to DNA.
No mutation detected – no further testing
One mutation – sweat test at CF center
Two mutations – diagnosis confirmed
36. Hearing Loss
37. Deafness – Who screens Not all infants in Texas are screened – who is required to screen:
(A) a hospital licensed under Health and Safety Code, Chapter 241 that offers obstetrical services and is located in a county with a population of more than 50,000;
(B) a birthing center licensed under Health and Safety Code, Chapter 244 that is located in a county with a population of more than 50,000 and that has 100 or more births per year; or
(C) a hospital that offers obstetrical services or a birthing center licensed under Health and Safety Code, Chapter 244:
(i) that participates in the State's medical assistance program; and
(ii) is not otherwise included in paragraphs (2)(A) or (2)(B) of this section but agrees with the department to provide hearing screening services for newborns in compliance with Health and Safety Code, Chapter 47, and accepts a one-time grant from the department for the purchase of newborn hearing screening equipment prior to August 31, 2002.
38. Deafness – Methodology No clear guidelines for how screening is done.
Otoacoustic emissions (OAE) – done for low risk infants; measures response of hair cells to tone – does NOT detect retrocochlear deafness
Auditory Brainstem Evoked Response (ABR) – measures brainstem response to tone – will detect all forms of hearing loss
39. Deafness – Follow-up Abnormal OAE should be followed up with an ABR
40. Communication Abnormal results can be alarming to new parents
Relay that the test indicates that further testing is required and should be done quickly to prevent potential problems
e.g. “Results of the newborn screen are back and they indicate that further blood and urine testing is required to ensure the health and safety of your baby.”
41. MOD A Parents Guide to NBS Video YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqQRio1-P6c
42. Expanded NBS Logistics in TX Multi-part card sold to hospital of birth
Parents bring card with serial # with them to 1st pediatric visit
Cutoffs are age-based, so important to do within required time frame
Abnormal results called & faxed with ACT & FACT sheet
Diagnostic testing/referral to metabolic center
43. NBS Collection FormParent Copy
44. NBS Collection FormDemographics Form
45. NBS Collection FormFilter Paper for Blood Collection
46. Resources ACT/FACT sheets Texas Department of State Health Services http://www.dshs.state.tx.us/newborn/default.shtm
American College of Medical Genetics www.acmg.net
47. ACT Sheet
48. FACT Sheet
49. Contact Information for TX1-800-252-8023 Mon-Saturday CAH 2819
CH 3666
Galact 6827
Hbg/SSD 7715
PKU 6827
Biotinidase 2071
FAODs 3874
OA/AA 3871 General 7333
Supplies 7661
Billing 7317
Reporting 7578
Case Mgt 2193
50. Expanded NBS Advocacy Groups March of Dimes www.mod.com
Save Babies through Screening Foundation, Inc www.savebabies.org
Many parent support groups including: Fatty Oxidation Support Group www.fodsupport.org, National Urea Cycle Disorders Foundation www.nucdf.org, etc.
51. References Chace DH, Sherwin JE, Hillman SL, Lorey F, Cunningham GC. 1998. Use of phenylalanine-to-tyrosine ratio determined by tandem mass spectrometry to improve newborn screening for phenylketonuria of early discharge specimens collected during the first 24 hours. Clin Chem 44:2405-2409.
Chace DH, DiPerna JC, Naylor EW. 1999. Laboratory integration and utilization of tandem mass spectrometry in neonatal screening: a model for clinical mass spectrometry in the next millennium. Acta Paediatr Suppl 88(432):45-47.
Clayton PT, Doig M, Ghafari S, Meaney C, Taylor C, Leonard JV, Morris M, Johnson AW. 1998. Screening for medium chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency using electrospray ionisation tandem mass spectrometry. Arch Dis Child 79:109-115.
Pollitt RJ. 1999. Tandem mass spectrometry screening: proving effectiveness. Acta Paediatr Suppl 88(432):40-44.
Wiley V, Carpenter K, Wilcken B. 1999. Newborn screening with tandem mass spectrometry: 12 months’ experience in NSW Australia. Acta Paediatr Suppl 88(432)48-51.