1 / 17

Heteroskedasticity

Heteroskedasticity. Definition Consequences of heteroscedasticity Testing for Heteroskedasticity Breusch-Pagan White test (2 forms) Fixing the problem Robust standard errors Weighted Least Squares Fixing heteroskedasticity in LPM model. Heteroskedasticity.

cali
Download Presentation

Heteroskedasticity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Heteroskedasticity • Definition • Consequences of heteroscedasticity • Testing for Heteroskedasticity • Breusch-Pagan • White test (2 forms) • Fixing the problem • Robust standard errors • Weighted Least Squares • Fixing heteroskedasticity in LPM model.

  2. Heteroskedasticity • Consequences of heteroskedasticity for OLS • OLS still unbiased and consistent under heteroskedastictiy • Interpretation of R-squared unchanged. • Heteroskedasticity invalidates variance formulas for OLS estimators • The usual F tests and t tests are not valid with heteroskedasticity • Under heteroskedasticity, OLS is no longer the best linear unbiased estimator (BLUE); there may be more efficient linear estimators Unconditional error variance is unaffected by heteroskedasticity (which refers to the conditional error variance)

  3. Heteroskedasticity • Heteroskedasticity-robust inference after OLS estimation • Formulas for OLS standard errors and related statistics have been developed that are robust to heteroskedasticity of unknown form • All formulas are only valid in large samples • Formula for heteroskedasticity-robust OLS standard error • Using these formulas for standard errors, the usual t test is valid asymptotically valid with heteroskedasticity • The usual F statistic does not work under heteroskedasticity, but heteroskedasticity robust versions are available in Stata • To obtain heteroskedasticity robust standard errors and F-stats in Stata, reg y x, robustCoefficients are unchanged by robust option, but standard errors, t-statistics, and F-statistics change. Also called White/Huber/Eicker standard errors.

  4. Heteroskedasticity • Example: Hourly wage equation Heteroskedasticity robust standard errors may be larger or smaller than their nonrobust counterparts. The differencesareoftensmall in practice. • F statistics are also often similar. If there is strong heteroskedasticity, differences may be larger. Tobe on thesafeside, itisadvisabletoalwayscompute robust standarderrors.

  5. Heteroskedasticity • Testing for heteroskedasticity • Even with robust standard errors, it may still be useful to test whether there is heteroskedasticity because then OLS may not be the most efficient linear estimator anymore • Breusch-Pagan test for heteroskedasticity Under MLR.4 The meanof u2 must not varywith x1, x2, …, xk

  6. Heteroskedasticity • Breusch-Pagan test for heteroskedasticity (cont.)Regress squared residuals on all expla-natory variables and test whether this regression has explanatory power. A large teststatistic (= a high R-squared) isevidenceagainstthe null hypothesis. Alternative teststatistic (= Lagrange multiplierstatistic, LM). Again, highvaluesoftheteststatistic (= high R-squared) leadtorejectionofthe null hypothesisthattheexpectedvalueof u2isunrelatedtotheexplanatory variables.

  7. Heteroskedasticity • Example: Heteroskedasticity in housing price equations Homoskedasticity rejected homoskedasticity not rejected

  8. Heteroskedasticity • The White test for heteroskedasticity • Disadvantage of this form of the White test • Including all squares and interactions leads to a large number of estimated parameters (e.g. k=6 leads to 27 parameters to be estimated) Regress squared residuals on all expla-natory variables, theirsquares, and in-teractions (here: examplefor k=3) The White test detects more general deviations from heteroskedasticity than the Breusch-Pagan test

  9. Heteroskedasticity • Alternative form of the White test • Example: Heteroskedasticity in (log) housing price equations Thisregressionindirectlyteststhedependenceofthesquaredresiduals on theexplanatory variables, theirsquares, andinteractions, becausethepredictedvalueof y anditssquareimplicitlycontain all oftheseterms.

  10. Heteroskedasticity • Weighted least squares estimation • Heteroskedasticity is known up to a multiplicative constant The functional form of the heteroskedasticity is known Transformed model

  11. Heteroskedasticity • Example: Savings and income • The transformed model is homoskedastic • If the other Gauss-Markov assumptions hold as well, OLS applied to the transformed model is the best linear unbiased estimator Note thatthisregression model hasnointercept

  12. Heteroskedasticity • OLS in the transformed model is weighted least squares (WLS) • WLS is more efficient than OLS because less weight is placed on observations with a large variance • In Stata, suppose estimate WLS with • gen inv_inc=1/inc • reg sav inc [aw=inv_inc] where inv_inc=(1/inc) • aw=analytic weights that are inversely proportional to variance of the residual Observationswith a large varianceget a smallerweight in theoptimizationproblem

  13. Heteroskedasticity Example: Financial wealth equation Net financial wealth (in 1000s) Assumed form of heteroskedasticity Stata: reg nettfa inc age_25_sq male e401k [aw=1/inc]Code for estimation in g:\eco\evenwe\wls_with_401k Participation in 401K pension plan

  14. Heteroskedasticity • Special cases of heteroskedasticity • If the observations are reported as averages at the city/county/state/-country/firm level, they should be weighted by the size of the unit • If observations are reported as aggregates, weight by inverse of size. Averagecontributiontopension plan in firm i Averageearningsandage in firm i Percentage firm contributesto plan Heteroskedastic error term Error variance if errors are homoskedastic at the individual-level If errors are homoskedastic at the individual-level, WLS with weights equal to firm size mi should be used. If the assumption of homoskedasticity at the individual-level is not exactly right, one can calculate robust standard errors after WLS (i.e. forthetransformed model).

  15. Heteroskedasticity • Skip sections on • feasbile GLS (8-4b) • prediction intervals with heteroskedasticity (8-4d)

  16. Heteroskedasticity • WLS in the linear probability model • Infeasible if LPM predictions are below zero or greater than one • If such cases are rare, they may be adjusted to values such as .01/.99 • Otherwise, it is probably better to use OLS with robust standard errors In the LPM, the exact form of heteroskedasticity is known Use inverse valuesasweights in WLS

  17. Summary of Issues with Heteroskedasticity • If heteroscedasticity exists and not corrected for • Standard errors, t-statistics, and F-statistics are wrong • Coefficient estimates are still unbiased, but inefficient • Several tests for heteroscedasticity available • Breusch-Pagan • White (2 forms) • Corrections for heteroscedasticity • Heteroskedasticity robust standard errors • No change in coefficients (still inefficient like OLS), but standard errors are correct • Weighted Least Squares • More efficient than OLS and correct standard errors • Requires knowledge of functional form for heteroscedasticity • Linear probability model requires correction for heteroscedasticity • Robust standard errors are simple fix • WLS is more efficient, but creates problems if predicted probabilities are outside unit interval.

More Related