1 / 16

August 2009

Addressing State and Local Fiscal Challenges Through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. August 2009. State and Local Governments in the U.S. Federal System. 89,527 state and local governments

Download Presentation

August 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Addressing State and Local Fiscal Challenges Through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act August 2009

  2. State and Local Governments in the U.S. Federal System • 89,527 state and local governments • State and local employment represented approximately 14 percent of total U.S. employment in 2007 • State and local government operating and capital expenditures totaled more than $2 trillion in 2007 • State and local expenditures represented approximately 12 percent of GDP in 2007 • States and localities received more than $430 billion in federal grant funds in 2007 and about $500 billion in 2009 • State and local governments collected $1.3 trillion in tax receipts in 2007

  3. State and Local Governments Face Increasing Fiscal Challenges Percent of GDP Operating Surplus/Deficit Fall 2008 Operating Surplus/Deficit Jan 2009 Source: Historical data from National Income and Product Accounts. Historical data from 1980 – 2007, Sept. 2008 & January, 2009 GAO projections from 2008 – 2050 using many CBO projections and assumptions, particularly for next 10 years.

  4. State and Local Fiscal Difficulties Are Largely Driven by Rising Health Costs Percent of GDP State and Local Government Non-Health Care Expenditures State and Local Government Health Care Expenditures Source: Historical data from National Income and Product Accounts. Historical data from 2000 – 2007, projections from 2008 – 2050. Note: Health care expenditures include health care benefits for employees and retirees and medical spending on behalf of individuals, such as Medicaid and SCHIP; Non-Health Care Expenditures include all expenditures with the exception of health care and interest payments.

  5. Federal Grants to State and Local Governments by Function Source: Budget of the U.S. Government, Fiscal Year 2009, H. Doc. 110-84, Vol. III. Note: Data shown are 2007 Actual Outlays.

  6. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) • Has several provisions that may mitigate the fiscal difficulties that state and local governments are facing • Provides about $787 billion in spending and tax provisions: • More than $580 billion in additional spending • More than $280 billion in grants to states (including grants that go through states to individuals)

  7. Purposes of the Recovery Act • To preserve and create jobs and promote economic recovery. • To assist those most impacted by the recession. • To provide investments needed to increase economic efficiency by spurring technological advances in science and health. • To invest in transportation, environmental protection, and other infrastructure that will provide long-term economic benefits. • To stabilize state and local government budgets, in order to minimize and avoid reductions in essential services.

  8. GAO’s State and Local Reporting Strategy • Recovery Act requires GAO to “conduct bimonthly reviews and prepare reports on such reviews on the use by selected States and localities of funds made available in this Act.” • Strategy • Longitudinal study of 16 states and the District of Columbia • Selection criteria based on the stated purposes of the Recovery Act • Additional states added as other events dictate, including ongoing GAO work • Localities sampled within selected states • GAO senior executives to coordinate with each selected state

  9. American Recovery & Reinvestment Act 1. Arizona 2. California 3. Colorado 4. Florida 5. Georgia 6. Illinois 7. Iowa 8. Massachusetts 9. Michigan 10. Mississippi 11. New Jersey 12. New York 13. North Carolina 14. Ohio 15. Pennsylvania 16. Texas 17. Washington, D.C.

  10. Reporting Objectives • States’ and localities’ use of funds • States’ and localities’ up-front safeguards and ongoing monitoring, audits, and evaluations • States’ and localities’ plans to evaluate the impact of funds

  11. Projected versus Actual Federal Outlays to States and Localities under the Recovery Act Dollars (in billions) Actual federal outlays as of June 19, 2009 $28.8 Fiscal year Source: GAO analysis of data from CBO, Recovery.gov and Federal Funds Information for States.

  12. 87 Percent of Estimated Fiscal Year 2009 Federal Recovery Act Outlays to States and Localities Are in the Nine Programs Reviewed by GAO Source: GAO analysis of data from CBO and Federal Funds Information for States.

  13. GAO Recommendations • Accountability and Transparency • Leverage Single Audit as an effective oversight tool • Move to earlier reporting on internal controls • Focus on Recovery Act programs • Give relief for low-risk programs • Fund more timely, effective Single Audits • Reporting on Impact • Provide examples of reporting on jobs created and retained • Clarify new or existing program performance measures • Communications and Guidance • Clarify data quality and reconciliation requirements • Specify data certification and approval requirements • Ensure more direct communication on funds flowing to each state Source: GAO.

  14. GAO Recovery Act Information • July 2009 Bi-Monthly Report:GAO-09-829 Recovery Act: As Initial Implementation Unfolds in States and Localities, Continued Attention to Accountability Issues Is Essential • GAO Recovery Act website: http://www.gao.gov/recovery

More Related