1 / 43

The 231 Pa/ 230 Th Paleoproxy: How should we interpret the growing observational dataset?

The 231 Pa/ 230 Th Paleoproxy: How should we interpret the growing observational dataset? Gideon Henderson Alex Thomas Mark Siddall James Rae Ben Hickey University of Oxford. A proxy for past rates of ocean circulation. Lynch Stieglitz et al. 2007.

buffy
Download Presentation

The 231 Pa/ 230 Th Paleoproxy: How should we interpret the growing observational dataset?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The 231Pa/230Th Paleoproxy: How should we interpret the growing observational dataset? Gideon Henderson Alex Thomas Mark Siddall James Rae Ben Hickey University of Oxford

  2. A proxy for past rates of ocean circulation Lynch Stieglitz et al. 2007

  3. Oceanic behaviour of U-series nuclides

  4. Oceanic behaviour of U-series nuclides

  5. Fluxes of 231Pa and 230Th Scavenging of nuclide Downward transport Continued equilibration

  6. Fluxes of 231Pa and 230Th

  7. Fluxes of 231Pa and 230Th

  8. Residence time of waters in North Atlantic Rhien et al. 2001

  9. Some real 230Th data South Atlantic Labrador Sea

  10. Fluxes of 231Pa and 230Th

  11. Fluxes of 231Pa and 230Th

  12. 231Pa/230Th in the oceans

  13. Glacial NADW formation rates Suggests similar rates of NADW flow in glacial and Holocene Yu et al. 1996

  14. Sensitivity of the proxy Marchal 2000

  15. Millennial changes in NADW flow McManus et al. 2004

  16. So that’s how it’s supposed to work. but… 1. Which depth water-mass is it telling us about? 2. Doesn’t it have a big particle flux effect as well? 3. How about preferential scavenging by opal? 4. Do other things reset Pa/Th except for ventilation? 5. Does it look as though it works in other settings? 6. Do we really understand it?

  17. 1. Which depth of water mass? `

  18. ` Southern Indian Ocean Thomas et al. 2006

  19. ` Indian Ocean seawater profiles 230Th 231Pa 232Th Thomas et al. 2006

  20. ` Where does the proxy signal come from? Is sedimentary 231Pa/230Th representative of whole water column?

  21. 2. The role of particle flux? Chase et al. 2003

  22. 3. Preferential opal scavenging Chase et al. 2003

  23. Modelling the behaviour of Pa and Th Distribution coefficients after Luo and Ku (Pa with strong preference for lithogenic particles) Distribution coefficients after Chase et al (Pa with preference for opal, Th for carbonate) Siddall, Henderson, et al. (2005)

  24. ` 4. What else resets it?

  25. ` Indian Ocean seawater profiles 230Th 231Pa 232Th Thomas et al. 2006

  26. ` Southern Indian Ocean

  27. ` Benthic d18O Reconstruction of deep inflow to Indian Ocean Down core record from East of Madagascar indicates little or no change in ABW flow into Indian Ocean during full climate cycle (231Pa/230Th)xs Authigenic U Thomas et al. 2007

  28. 5. Does it work in other settings? Present day model - 14Sv MOC Siddall et al. 2007

  29. Modelling ocean Pa/Th - MOC shutdown Shut down model - 2Sv MOC Siddall et al. 2007

  30. Effect of MOC shutdown on Pa/Th Difference between full and shutdown MOC Siddall et al. 2007

  31. Effect of MOC shutdown on Pa/Th Difference between full and shutdown MOC Siddall et al. 2007

  32. Preliminary data from the Argentine Basin

  33. Ice core 18O Benthic 18O McManus Pa/Th Fast New Pa/Th Slow Fe/Ca Sea level Rae et al

  34. NADW AIW/NADW AIW And some other cores… Different water masses? Or different sediment composition?

  35. Effect of MOC shutdown on Pa/Th Difference between full and shutdown MOC Siddall et al. 2007

  36. Preliminary Cape Basin results Difference between full and shutdown MOC Negre et al. 2007

  37. Preliminary Cape Basin results Negre et al. 2007

  38. Upstream silica scavenging?

  39. 6. Do we really understand it? Model of sediment Pa/Th compared to water-columnobservations Siddall, Henderson, et al. (2005)

  40. Interpretation of data by 3D modeling Model of sediment Pa/Th compared to sediment observations Siddall, Henderson, et al. (2005)

  41. U-Series Geochemistry

  42. Don’t get fooled by models

More Related