510 likes | 614 Views
I. II. III. IV. V. 100. 100. 100. 100. 100. 200. 200. 200. 200. 200. 300. 300. 300. 300. 300. 400. 400. 400. 400. 400. 500. 500. 500. 500. 500. Decision declared that separate but equal facilities did not violate the 14 th amendment. Plessy v. Ferguson.
E N D
I II III IV V 100 100 100 100 100 200 200 200 200 200 300 300 300 300 300 400 400 400 400 400 500 500 500 500 500
Decision declared that separate but equal facilities did not violate the 14th amendment.
This decision declared that separate but equal had no place in education
This case said that if you create a clear and present danger to a nation at war that your 1st amendment rights are limited
This case said that a president does not have executive privilege when it comes to legal investigations.
This court case said that only the Federal government had the jurisdiction to deal with the Indian nations.
In this case the Supreme Court assumed the power of judicial review.
In this case, Marshall and his court deemed that the creation of a national bank was constitutional (using the elastic clause)
This 1857 decision said that Congress prohibiting slavery in any territory was a violation of the 5th amendment.
This case said that the Granger laws were unconstitutional and led to the passage of the Interstate Commerce Act.
This case said that the federal government has the power to halt a strike that affects a nation’s public welfare – mail service (even if it infringes on 1st amendment rights).
This court case deemed the NIRA unconstitutional for it allowed the it gave the executive department the right to regulate interstate commerce (that belonged to Congress)
This case said that Executive Order 9066 did not violate the Japanese Americans’ 14th and 5th amendment rights due to the fact that they created a clear and present danger to a nation at war.
This decision said “one person, one vote” and called for the reapportionment of election districts.
This said that a NY State school prayer violated the 1st amendment’s prohibition on the establishment of religion.
This decision stated that the state governments must provide lawyers for all felony cases involving indigent accused persons (6th amendment)
This decision said that the accused must be informed of the right to remain silent.
This court case decision said that students rights are not left at the school house gate – it was in reaction to students protesting the Vietnam War by wearing black armbands.
This case said that “prior restraint” violated the 1st amendment’s freedom of the press in regards to the Pentagon Papers.
This case stated that the 9th and 14th amendments protected a woman’s right to an abortion in the 1st trimester
The court ruled that states could seek to control abortion through reasonable waiting periods and parental consent for minors as long as the regulations were not unduly burdensome.
This case said that school districts need only reasonable suspicion to conduct a reasonable search.
The court decided that to maintain school safety that a school could drug test athletes.
This decision stated that quotas to ensure affirmative action were unconstitutional
Said that the commerce clause of the Constitution allowed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibition of racial discrimination in any place of public accommodation.