distinguishing between self and other how shared are shared representations marcel brass
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations? Marcel Brass

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 26

Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations? Marcel Brass - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 73 Views
  • Uploaded on

Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations? Marcel Brass. MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE. FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF COGNITIVE NEUROLOGY LEIPZIG. Cognitive psychology

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations? Marcel Brass' - britanni-rogers


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
distinguishing between self and other how shared are shared representations marcel brass
Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations?Marcel Brass

MAX

PLANCK

INSTITUTE

  • FOR
  • HUMAN
  • COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES
  • DEPARTMENT OF COGNITIVE NEUROLOGY
  • LEIPZIG
observation and execution of action are closely linked
Cognitive psychology

movement observation has a strong influence on movement execution (Brass et al., 2000, 2001, Stuermer et al., 2000)

Social psychology

chameleon effect (Chartrand & Bargh, 1999)

Brain imaging

activation of motor related areas by action observation (e.g. Grezes & Decety, 1999)

Neurophysiology

mirror neurons (e.g. Rizzolatti & Craighero, 2004)

Observation and execution of action are closely linked
the direct matching hypothesis
The direct matching hypothesis

Action observation leads to an activation of an internal motor representation.

open questions
Why don‘t we imitate all the time?

Why don‘t we confuse internally generated and externally triggered motor representations?

Open questions
neuropsychological findings
Luria (1966)

prefrontal patients show echopractic response tendencies

Lhermitte et al. (1986), DeRenzi et al. (1996)

patients with prefrontal lesions show overt imitative behavior

Neuropsychological findings
the imitation inhibition task
incongruent

congruent

baseline

The imitation-inhibition task

Brass et al. (2000)

the imitation inhibition task1
The imitation-inhibition task

Lift the index finger when a `1` appears

and the middle finger when a `2` appears.

+

+

Brass et al. (2000)

results
con

base

incon

Results

Brass et al. (2000)

patients
Patients
  • 16 patients with frontal lesions of different etiology and lesion site
  • 14 patients with posterior lesions (temporal, parietal)
  • 16 age-matched controls
results1
Imitation-inhibition task

*

*

posterior

control

frontal

Results

interference score: incongruent errors (%) – congruent errors (%)

Brass et al. (2003)

conclusions
Conclusions
  • Patients with frontal lesions have problems to inhibit imitative response tendencies.
functional mechanisms involved in the inhibition of imitative behavior
Functional mechanisms involved in the inhibition of imitative behavior
  • Hypothesis
    • The inhibition of imitative behavior involves general inhibitory mechanisms.
    • The inhibition of imitative behavior involves specific mechanisms related to the distinction of self-generated and externally triggered motor representations.
experiment a l design
ten healthy right handed participants

the imitation-inhibition task

functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)

Experimental design
i mitation inhibition task
1

2

1

2

anterior fronto-median cortex (aFMC)

temporo-parietal junction area (TPJ)

Imitation-inhibition task

Incongruent vs. congruent

Brass, Derrfuss & von Cramon(2005)

the functional role of the anterior fronto median cortex and the tpj
The functional role of the anterior fronto-median cortex and the TPJ
  • sense of agency (e.g. Farrer et al., 2003)
  • perspective taking (Ruby & Decety, 2001, 2003)
  • out of body experience (Blanke et al., 2002)
conclusions1
Conclusions
  • The inhibition of imitative behaviour seems to involve mechanisms related to self-other distinction.
paradigm
Paradigm

non-corresponding restraint

corresponding restraint

no restraint

slide23
Test

Stimuli

no restraint

corresponding restraint

Responses

if a ‘1‘ appears

if a ‘2‘ appears

summary
There is an automatic tendency to imitate observed behaviour.

Prefrontal patients have problems to inhibit imitative response tendencies.

The inhibition of imitative behaviour involves functional mechanisms related to self-other distinction.

Not only the action itself is mapped onto the observer’s motor representation but also environmental constraints.

Summary
slide26
Roman LiepeltStephanie SpenglerMichael SteinbornHarold BekkeringJan DerrfussWolfgang PrinzD. Yves von Cramon
ad