Download
1 / 9
90 likes | 211 Views
In February 2005, a comprehensive update on Contractor Cost and Software Data Reporting (CSDR) highlighted key outreach activities, significant changes in DAES reporting, and the ongoing status of automation projects. Important developments include improved coordination with DCAA, refined audit procedures, and updates on training methodologies and participation. The report noted a significant shift in project statuses, revealing advancements from red/yellow advisory statuses to more favorable assessments. Continued focus on the contracting community is emphasized to maintain progress and ensure quality in cost data collection.
E N D
Contractor Cost and SoftwareData Reporting: An Update Mike Augustus February 2005
Outline • Outreach activities • Changes in DAES Reporting • Automation Status • eRoom • Pre-processor and Validator • Training Update
Outreach Activities • Coordination with DCAA • Developed audit procedure • Now conducting audits • Coordination with OSD(AT&L) • Acquisition Resources and Analysis (ARA) • Include status of CSDR in DAES Assessments • Update MIL-HDBK-881B • Revise EVM DID • Defense Procurement & Acquisition Policy • Turning attention to contracting community
Green Green Advisory Yellow Red Not-rated Yellow Advisory 4th Round GRP A/B/C ACAT 1 CCDR Status GRP A: As of November 10, 2004 GRP B: As of December 6, 2004 GRP C: As of October 7, 2004
CCDR DAES AssessmentCY 2004 Progress GRP A: As of November 10, 2004 GRP B: As of December 6, 2004 GRP C: As of October 7, 2004
DAES Reporting Summary • Significant improvement since January • 1St Round (end March): • 44 Red/Yellow Advisory • 10 Yellow • 4 Green/Green Advisory • 4th Round (end December): • 9 Red/Yellow Advisory • 21 Yellow • 26 Green/Green Advisory • Still have problem programs • Recommend problem programs brief USD(AT&L)/CAIG re CSDR Status
Automation Status • Significant delays in delivery of eRoom and Pre-processor/Validator • Incumbent IT contractor departed 28 October 2004 • New IT Contractor on contract November 29, 2004 • Transition complete • eRoom requirements analysis underway • Pre-processor/Validator requirements analysis updated and near completion
Training Activities • Revamped training methodology • Looking at long-term plan • CY 2004-CY 2005 plan • Five sessions held • Aircraft Systems: August 25-26: Lockheed Martin, Ft Worth • 67 attendees (52 from industry) • Missile/Ordnance: Sept 22-23: Raytheon, Tucson • 90 attendees (74 from industry) • Space Systems: Oct 16-17: Lockheed Martin, Sunnyvale • 84 attendees (33 from industry) • Ship Systems: Nov 16-17: Northrop Grumman, New Orleans • 64 attendees (51 from industry) • Electronic Systems: February 1-2: Northrop Grumman, Baltimore • 66 attendees (41 from industry)
Summary • Outreach Activities are bearing fruit • Great coordination with AT&L on EVMS and WBS • Turning attention to contracting community • Analysis Activities are improving • DAES process is a “double-edged sword” • Improvements in cost data collection • Quality issues continue • Goal is to get “Green” fast without doing the hard work • Dynamic process not a “one-time” thing • Training Activities are illustrating process problems • New training is well received • Need participation by contracting community
