1 / 29

Minnesota Oral Health Promotion Coalition Meeting Coalitions 2.0 Considerations for a Roadmap

Presentation Overview. Minnesota Oral Health Summit

brier
Download Presentation

Minnesota Oral Health Promotion Coalition Meeting Coalitions 2.0 Considerations for a Roadmap

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

    1. Minnesota Oral Health Promotion Coalition Meeting Coalitions 2.0 Considerations for a Roadmap Reg Louie, DDS, MPH St. Paul, Minnesota June 12, 2009

    2. Presentation Overview Minnesota Oral Health Summit – Visions for Oral Health (2009) Changing Paradigms in Oral Health State Oral Health Models from CDC and other Oral Health Coalitions Tools from ASTDD State Promising Practices MOH Landscape SWOT ? Roadmap to the Future

    3. Minnesota OH Summit 2009 Minnesota Oral Health Summit -? Oral Health Vision for the Future – 5 topic groups: Prevention, Education, Awareness Policy and Funding Access to Care Workforce Development Bridging Private/Public Sectors -? 3 Oral Health Visions for the Future

    4. Changing Paradigms for Controlling Dental Caries Old Paradigm --> Surgical / ‘Drill & Fill’ (dealing with consequences of disease) ? Later Paradigm: Prevention!!! (generally “one size fits all”) ? “Current” Paradigm: Early Intervention, Risk Assessment, Anticipatory Guidance, Individualized Prevention and Disease Management (targeted, systematic, evidence-based approaches)

    5. Rethinking Prevention: Broad Strategies / Goals Reduce the burden of disease through the efficient integration of: Health promotion Preventive services Disease management Treatment services Expand access to ongoing diagnostic, preventive and treatment services in “dental homes” Application of risk assessment and targeted, evidence-based interventions

    6. Minnesota Head Start PIR Data 2006-07 CHILDREN SERVED 15,709 - MN US With health insurance 89% (93%) “Dental home” 83% (86%) PS* Dental exam 85% (88%) PS* Preventive care 89% (85%) PS* Needing treatment 28% (25%) PS* Receiving treatment 84% (83%) * Preschool Head Start Children Only

    7. Minnesota Oral Health PIR Trends – Percent of Head Start Children (2004-07) 2004 2005 2006 2007 Health insurance 87% 87% 88% 89% “Dental Home” 73% 73% 79% 83% HS Preschool (3 to 5-years) Dental Exam 63% 65% 74% 85% Prevent. Care 44% 69% 90% 89% Need Tx 20% 32% 28% 26% Received Tx 70% 79% 83% 84%

    8. Minnesota Early Head Start PIR Data (2006-07) INFANTS/TODDLERS (Birth to 3 years) Dental screenings at well-baby exams – 80% (68%) Professional dental exams – 47% (54%) PREGNANT WOMEN/TEENS With health insurance – 95% (89%) Receiving dental exams or Treatment – 42% (42%)

    9. CDC – Oral Health Infrastructure Development Cooperative Agreements 2003-2008: 23 projects funded (12 States and 1 Pacific jurisdiction) 16 States funded in 2008 8 specific/required areas of program focus (“recipient activities”)

    10. CDC – OH Infrastructure Development Cooperative Agreements (2008-13) Eight Recipient Activities Program Infrastructure: Staffing, management and support Data collection and surveillance Strategic Planning – State OH Plan Partnerships and coalitions Access to and utilization of preventive interventions Policy development Evaluation Program collaboration

    11. What is a Coalition? Definition: a group of individuals and/or organizations with common interest who agree to work together toward a common goal Coalitions may be loose associations in which members work for short time to achieve a specific goal; and then disband, or they may also become organizations in themselves, with governing bodies, particular community responsibilities, funding and permanence Regardless of their size and structure, they exist to create and/or support efforts to reach a particular set of goals

    12. Goals of a Coalition Coalition goals are as varied as coalitions themselves, but often contain elements of one or more of the following: Influencing or developing public policy, usually around a specific issue. Changing people's behavior. Building a healthy community.

    13. Why Develop a Coaliltion? Concentrate the community's focus on a particular problem. Create alliances among those who might not normally work together. Keep the community's approach to issues consistent.

    15. ASTDD- Infrastructure Development Tools Surveillance Methodologies Policy and Systems Strategies Best Practices Models Policy: Coalitions, Oral Health Plans, Mandates State OH Program Review Manual Core functions, competencies and activities http://www.astdd.org/index.php

    16. A full listing of the Best Practice Approach Reports can be displayed. Quick access to open each report is also provided. . A full listing of the Best Practice Approach Reports can be displayed. Quick access to open each report is also provided. .

    17. The ASTDD homepage opens to the Best Practices Web page, which gives access to the Best Practice Approach Reports and State and Community Practice Examples. In addition, the Web page provides background information about the Project, provides access to the Project’s survey results, and offers other links of interest.The ASTDD homepage opens to the Best Practices Web page, which gives access to the Best Practice Approach Reports and State and Community Practice Examples. In addition, the Web page provides background information about the Project, provides access to the Project’s survey results, and offers other links of interest.

    18. State Promising Practices Infrastructure Development (including coalitions)-Nevada and other CDC funded states – AK, CO, AR, IL, SC, TX Kansas – Philanthropic funded coalition and state Oral Health initiative Massachusetts – Special legislative commission on Oral Health New Mexico – Tax considerations for dentists

    19. State Promising Practices (2) State Oral Health Plans (NV, ME, IL, KS) Statutory Mandate for State Oral Health Program (some w/ definitions for state dental director or dental officer) - Iowa Maryland – Dental Action Committee convened by Secretary of HMH in response to Deamonte Driver; state funding for infrastructure and increasing access

    20. Statewide Efforts to Expand Access to Care for Young Children Washington ABCD Program Training for general dentists to treat very young children Enhanced reimbursement (XIX) North Carolina “Into the Mouths of Babes” Prevent ECE by reimbursing peds, FPs, CHCs for Px and referrals for dental care Partners: NCAP, NCAFP, NCDS, NCAPD, UNC, NCDM, NCDPH California First 5 Initiative Training for general dentists Training for primary care providers

    21. Nevada State Oral Health 1999 – Report of Governor’s Advisory Board (rec’ds, redirect MCH Title V grant) 2002 – CDC Grant, Series of Regional Summits (formed coalitions) 2004 – Summit 2.0, More representative state OH plan keyed to HP2010/SG OH Report 2005 – Summit 3.0, special focus on non-urban areas/regional plans 2008 – Evaluation and Summit 4.0 re: 2004 plan, 4 policy work groups : change perceptions & increase awareness; expand prevention; improve access; assure dental workforce; and, renewal of competitive CDC grant

    22. Oral Health Kansas Sponsors Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas Foundation Delta Dental Plan of Kansas Foundation Health Care Foundation of Greater Kansas City Kansas Council on Developmental Disabilities Kansas Dental Association Kansas Dental Charitable Foundation Kansas Health Foundation Kansas State Office of Oral Health Sunflower Foundation The REACH Health Care Foundation United Methodist Health Ministry Fund

    23. Framework for South Carolina More Smiling Faces Project

    24. State Medicaid Dental Program Changes (2007)

    25. Minnesota Oral Health Landscape – SWOT Analysis Strengths Efforts of stakeholders and partners convening to proactively define and address issues affecting oral health in Minnesota

    26. SWOT Weaknesses The extent of the access problem and continuing/growing reservoir of need Emerging SOHP and no broad based, cohesive state oral health advocacy entity and need to define future path

    27. SWOT “Threats” or Challenges A very challenging state economy and infrastructure constraints Provider issues, including aging cohort and inadequate replacements Distribution of workforce vs. population Growing diversity of population

    28. SWOT Opportunities New five-year CDC grant to Minnesota Department of Health for Oral Health Infrastructure Enhancement and Program Improvement Build on the commitment and hard work of key stakeholders to deploy new strategies and to enhance existing ones to address the issues in oral health New provider models to enhance access Broaden the circle of partners and cultivate consensus “agenda”

    29. SWOT … then what? SWOT (systematic assessment) ? Priorities (importance/impact vs. changeability) ? Goals, Objectives, Outcomes (process and effect, time-framed, measurable, realistic) ? Action Steps, Activities, Resources (intentional actions and implementer) ? Evaluation ?

    30. Active Coalition + Partnerships and Collaborations = More Direct Path to Improved Oral Health for the People of Minnesota Thank you! reglouie@sbcglobal.net

More Related