330 likes | 352 Views
Delve into the uses and potential abuses of optical topography in studying neurovascular coupling. Learn about experimental setups, data processing methods, and the controversies surrounding the time course of concentration changes. Explore the nuances of neurovascular coupling, the complexities of vascular responses, and how NIRS can shed light on brain-related signals and deviations from traditional imaging modalities. Discover the interplay between neuronal activity, vascular responses, and stimulus parameters, while considering the challenges and opportunities in NIRS research.
E N D
0.8 0.4 0.0 -0.4 d[...-Hb]/µM 0.2 0.0 R -0.2 -0.4 imager 0 15 30 45 60 time / s d[...-Hb]/µM left right Studying NIRS from infancy
uses and abuses of optical topography hellmuth obrig
uses and abuses of optical topography hellmuth obrig!!!!!
this is a boring experiment 20s 20s condition 1 condition2 n=52 760 nm & 850 nm 7 detectors 8 sources
the interesting result is the time course concentration change / µM stim vs. stim stim vs. rest time /s
data processing artefact removal General Linear Model approach PCA removal of global effects event related averaging
Let‘s make things complicated Iadecola et al 04
... or alternatively oversimplify the matter neuronalmodel blood-flow regulator oxygen- extractor venous balloon BOLD contrast
‚activation‘ is an operational term E E 0.01µM 3 s D D [deoxy-Hb] BOLD contrast
the recoupling issue NIRS VEP
want a break? flow velocity oxygenation d OD neuronal activity vascular response stimulus parameters vascular-response
Comparing excitation and inhibition of primary motor cortex tapping TMS NIRS NIRS
the vascular response is similar motor TMS 10 0 -10 1 0 -1
The time courses are qualitatively similar oxy deoxy mmol / l mmol / l time / s time / s
activation and inhibition cannot be discriminated x3 x3 motor without with preactivation
Inverse problem of the vascular response Effect CBF Spiking (on target) (local) (output) Exitation Exitation+ Inhibition Deactivation Inhibition ? Inhibition ? Disinhibition ? Lauritzen & Gold PNAS 2003
Does background activity have an influence on the vascular response? ISS NIRS EEG ssVEP source detector
There is a focal hyperoxygenation over the occipital region detector oxy-Hb emitter deoxy-Hb
experimental setup 5ms 5ms 45ms 45ms ... ... 5 9 12 20 8 6 1 0 23 ... ... NIRS-probe EEG P3 O1 Pz O2 P4 15 s electrode 5 cm 2.5 cm NIRS 2.5 cm electrode 10 cm emitter detector
Neurovascular coupling? a 2*a a 2*a
Alpha power is an inverse predictor of the haemodynamic response 8-12Hz24-28Hz
Modulation of evoked and spontaneous activity is mutually dependent 1s ‚idling state‘ Summation (EP /LFP) stimulus desynchronisation
Use or abuse? There is a NIRS response closely linked to classical imaging methods There is changes which definitely are not related to the brain There is options to identify brain related signals Neurovascular coupling is a very general principle There are exceptions from the rule NIRS allows to investigate these deviations from a 1:1 translation