290 likes | 413 Views
Opportunities for Future Accelerators FFAG Model. Hywel Owen ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory. 4GLS – The Next Light Source for the UK. Daresbury Laboratory - Tower Building. ERLP – A Testbed for 4 th Generation Light Sources. FFAG Prototype - Location. FFAG Prototype - Location.
E N D
Opportunities for Future Accelerators FFAG Model Hywel Owen ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory
FFAG Prototype - Location 30deg extraction FFAG Ring
FFAG Prototype - Location 0deg extraction FFAG Ring
Arc Dipole Magnet with Chamber Arc Dipole Magnet Survey Target Holders 30 deg. extraction port EBPMs 0 deg. extraction port
Example Transfer Line: Transfer Line 2/Module 1 Quadrupole Magnet OTR Dipole Magnet Beam Height 1.4 from floor Lifting Points Girder Support Pedestal Corrector Coil/ EBPM Assembly Ion Pump
Electron BPMs Stripline (Straight Sections) Button (Arc Dipole Vessels) Typical accuracy ~10um Limited by alignment
85/70/50/Rect. Modular OTR/YAG Profile Monitor Centroid position ~1mm Profile resolution ~100um
Output Energy 8.35 – 35 MeV Perhaps higher (70 MeV with 2 passes?) Lower limit set by bunch train length via injection bend angle Norm. emittance ~4-7 mm-mrad Depends on cathode/gun Increased space charge at low energies (~b2g3) 10-160 pC/bunch (varies) 1 - 8000 bunches Bunch rep. rate 81.25 MHz Train rep. rate 1-20 Hz Energy spread ~1% ~1/E Bunch length ~4 ps without compression Shorter bunch lengths may be possible with negative compression Base RF 1.3GHz Timing measurement from Gun/EO laser <200fs Limited by RF and vibration Total beam power limited by radiation (3W) ERLP and FFAG: Key Parameters
-56 -28 0 0 +28 +28 +28 +ve +ve p p Compression and Energy Recovery FEL FEL
S2E Simulation 4 1 3 2 First case of complete S2E modelling of an ERL with a FEL and energy recovery
Compressors and Sign Conventions LD LB Relativity – ‘drift R56’ (small at 35MeV)
-28 +28 Positive and Negative Compression -ve +ve
Compression Summary • Compression to less than 4ps may be possible at FFAG • Perhaps as low as 300fs • Needs designing!
Site Stability • Concrete cast in 1973 • Well settled! • Very low differential movement • Very large mass of concrete on a stable foundation • As good as anywhere • 4GLS location ERLP Foundation Level Basement Level
ERLP Alignment - Survey Tools Faro Laser Tracker Repeatability 1m +1 m /m Accuracy 10 m + 0.8 m /m Uncertainty ≈ 10 m /m Portable Robust Spatial Analyzer Metrology Software Error Simulations Multiple instruments/types Automation
ERLP Alignment - 1st Grid Simulation 1st Simulation of proposed reference grid in SA 76 Grid reference points 40 Instrument positions Each point measured by a minimum of 3 instruments Faro Tracker Grid reference points
ERLP Survey - Simulation Results Most points can be surveyed to within +/- 50 m Worst point within +/- 82 m Instruments reference multiple points, worst Instrument position +/-13 m
ERLP Construction - Control Room Control System built on EPICs