1 / 17

A Climatology of Precipitation Efficiency in the Central Appalachian Mountain Region

A Climatology of Precipitation Efficiency in the Central Appalachian Mountain Region. James Morrow Nick Luchetti. Precipitation Efficiency = Precipitation/ Precipitable Water (i.e. moisture available through the depths of the atmosphere)

borna
Download Presentation

A Climatology of Precipitation Efficiency in the Central Appalachian Mountain Region

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A Climatology of Precipitation Efficiency in the Central Appalachian Mountain Region James Morrow Nick Luchetti

  2. Precipitation Efficiency = Precipitation/Precipitable Water (i.e. moisture available through the depths of the atmosphere) • Ratio represents the the fraction of available water vapor in the atmosphere that is translated into precipitation reaching the surface. • Factors that alter the ratio: • Storm Motion, Moisture Convergence, Coverage of Precipitation, Amount of lifting and instability release.

  3. Objectives: • Highlight any trends that may signal a recent change in the regional climate • Drought concerns • Heavy precipitation event concerns • Highlight the inter-annual variability in seasonal precipitation efficiency • Identify climate system controllers • Create a climatological visual display for operational forecasters to use when issuing watches and warnings.

  4. Study Area • Varying degrees of elevation • Flash flooding susceptibility • 25 weather stations

  5. Methods • 1982-2012 • Daily Precipitation data extracted from the National Climatic Data Center’s weather station database. • Precipitablewater data were gathered for a 2.5° latitude x 2.5° longitude area centered on Blacksburg, Virginia (elevation 640 m) • Re-analysis data base of NOAA’s Earth Systems Research Laboratory. • 31-year median ratios were spatially plotted using GIS(Inverse Distance tool) • Inter-annual median ratios vs. Multivariate ENSO Index(MEI) values were plotted.

  6. Spring Season(March-May)

  7. Summer Season(June-August)

  8. Fall Season(September-November)

  9. Winter Season(December-February)

  10. Full Season(January-December)

  11. Potential Controller-Orographic Lift • Atmospheric instability • Lower-atmospheric evaporation of hydrometers R^2 = .0049

  12. Potential Controller- El Niño/La Niña Cycles • ENSO phase change alters synoptic scale storm motion • Most evident in winter months

  13. Potential Controller- El Niño/La Niña Cycles • MEI + indicate El Niño • Wetter and cooler conditions • MEI – indicate LaNiña • Dryer and warmer conditions

  14. Winter Classic El Nino Events (1982-1983, 1991-1992, 1997-1998, 2002-2003, 2009-2010) (1.1,51%) (1.2,45%) (1.2,42%) (2.5,38%) (1.6,35%)

  15. Winter Classic La Niña Events(1989-1990,1999-2000, 2000-2001, 2010-2012) (-1.12,33%) (-.6,34%) (-1.2,26%) (-.909,22%)

  16. Conclusions and Continued Research • Variation is evident spatially and temporally • Visually, aspect may be a potential controller • Extreme ENSO Phases could be a potential controller • Use SWAT model to cross reference high flood risk areas • Look into other large scale circulations(North Atlantic Oscillation, Artic Oscillation)

More Related