1 / 35

TESOL – 2003 - Baltimore, Maryland Session #2313 Convention Center, Room 320

Language Background Effects on Deaf Written English Kathleen Eilers-crandall, Ph.D. National Technical Institute for the Deaf Rochester Institute of Technology. TESOL – 2003 - Baltimore, Maryland Session #2313 Convention Center, Room 320 Thursday, March 27, 2:00 pm to 2:45 pm.

Download Presentation

TESOL – 2003 - Baltimore, Maryland Session #2313 Convention Center, Room 320

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Language Background Effects on Deaf Written EnglishKathleen Eilers-crandall, Ph.D.National Technical Institute for the DeafRochester Institute of Technology TESOL – 2003 - Baltimore, Maryland Session #2313 Convention Center, Room 320 Thursday, March 27, 2:00 pm to 2:45 pm

  2. Study Background • In a language diverse classroom, the teacher has little information how previous language experiences are influencing the students' written English. • The teacher does not know the ways students' use of English may be related to the students' first language experiences. • However, the teacher observes that students who have similar scores on English placement tests do not necessarily experience the same success in learning.

  3. Study - Objective • To determine if there is a relationship between language background factors and written English characteristics of Deaf students who are writing at a basic level

  4. Language Background • Two groups • ASL Dominant Students • Non ASL Dominant Students

  5. Students Criteria – for both groups • Born in the U. S. • Enrolled in Level A reading and writing courses • Deafness onset before 1 year of age

  6. ASL Dominant Students Selection Characteristics based on L/CBQ • Began learning sign at birth • Preferred communication mode; self-rating = Sign Alone • Excellent sign skills; self-rating of sign skill = 5 • Less than excellent speech skills; self-rating of speech skills < 5

  7. Non ASL Dominant Students Selection Characteristics based on L/CBQ • Did not begin learning sign at birth • Preferred communication mode; self-rating = Speech Alone, or, Speech and Sign • Excellent or very good speech skills; self-rating = 5 or 4 • Less than excellent sign skills; self-rating of sign skills < 5

  8. ASL Dominant - Means PTA better ear = 100.8 dB HL Age of deafness onset = birth Age began learning sign = birth Sign skill rating = 5 Speech skill rating = 2 Non ASL Dominant - Means PTA better ear = 96.9 dB HL Age of deafness onset = 0.1 year Age began learning sign = 9.9 years Sign skill rating = 3.4 Speech skill rating = 4.4 Student Characteristics

  9. Data Collection • Daily journals in response to specific questions/topics • Digitally submitted via Message Board • http://www.rit.edu/~kecncp/discus

  10. Message Board

  11. Message Board – Topic Examples

  12. Message Board – Entry Examples

  13. More Entry Examples

  14. Analyses Conducted • Quantity • Number of words • Number of clauses • Number of words per clause • Variety • Number of unique words • Number of unique clause types

  15. Analysis Process • An MS Word Macro was written to organize samples into one word per line. • These data were transferred into MS Excel Worksheets. • MS Excel contains a unique item filter. This was applied to determine unique words. • Clause analyses were done by hand for the first 500 words. • Visual basic routines were written to count total and unique clause types.

  16. Vocabulary Analysis Examples Total words: 18 Unique words: 13

  17. Clause Types - Some Examples

  18. Clause Analysis Examples • Independent Clauses = 5 • Dependent Clauses = 2 • Unique Ind. Types = 4 • Unique Dep. Types = 1

  19. Quantity Analyses • Vocabulary: • Number of words used • Grammar: • Number of clauses in 500 words • Number of independent clauses • Number of dependent clauses • Number of words per clause

  20. ANOVA: F= 0.180; (p = 0.67); Not significant

  21. ANOVA: F= 0.144; (p = 0.71); Not significant

  22. [ALL] Ind v. Dep -- ANOVA: F= 202.96; (p = 8.45E-14); Significant Ind by group -- ANOVA: F = 0.176; (p = 0.68); Not significant Dep by group -- ANOVA: F = 0.009; (p = 0.93); Not significant

  23. ANOVA: F= 0.280; (p = 0.61); Not significant

  24. Variety Analyses • Vocabulary Variety: • Number of unique words • Clause Variety: • Number of unique independent clause types • Number of unique dependent clause types

  25. ANOVA: F= 67.66; (p = 3.11E-08); Significant

  26. ANOVA: F= 67.66; (p = 3.11E-08); Significant

  27. Variety by group – ANOVA: F = 5.34; (p = 0.039); Significant

  28. Variety by group -- ANOVA: F = 5.56; (p = 0.036); Significant

  29. Variety by group -- ANOVA: F = 7.99; (p = 0.015); Significant

  30. Variety by group – ANOVA: F = 1.58; (p = 0.23); Not Significant

  31. Summary -- Quantity Overall Significant Differences • Both groups used a larger number of unique vocabulary words in longer samples (213 Unique Words in 500 words, 330 in 1000 words, and 418 in 1500 words). • Both groups used more independent clauses than dependent clauses (Independent Clauses: 56.14; Dependent Clauses: 20.50).

  32. Summary -- Variety Significant Differences between Groups • Variety of independent clause types (average = 14.50 in 500 words for ASL Dominant students and 18.37 for Non ASL Dominant students) • Variety of single independent clause types (average = 3.83 in 500 words for ASL Dominant students and 3.13 for Non ASL Dominant students) • Variety of compound clause types (average = 4.17 in 500 words for ASL Dominant students and 6.25 for Non ASL Dominant students)

  33. Summary – Quantity & Variety No Significant Differences between Groups • Quantity: • Number of words used in 50 journal entries • Number of clauses in 500 words • Number of words per clause • Number of independent clauses used in 500 words • Number of dependent clauses used in 500 words • Variety: • Unique words used in 500, 1000, 1500 words • Unique dependent clauses used in 500 words

  34. Discussion • How do these results compare to the writing of native speakers of English? • What about appropriateness of vocabulary items? • What about the frequency of specific types of independent and dependent clauses? • What about grammatical acceptability for clause types?

  35. Kathleen Eilers Crandall, Ph.D. Department of English National Technical Institute for the Deaf Rochester Institute of Technology Lyndon Baines Johnson Building - 2264 Phone: (585) 475-5111 Fax: (585) 475-6500 Email: kecncp@rit.edu Web: http://www.rit.edu/~kecncp Presenter

More Related