1 / 13

Study Design and Summary

Study Design and Summary. Atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) observations were conducted in Sapporo , Japan from April 2005 to July 2007. T hree -dimensional scanning coherent Doppler lidar was utilized in this study. 50 dust devil–like vortices were detected.

bijan
Download Presentation

Study Design and Summary

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Study Design and Summary • Atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) observations were conducted in Sapporo, Japanfrom April 2005 to July 2007. • Three-dimensional scanning coherent Doppler lidar was utilized in this study. • 50 dust devil–like vortices were detected. • All dust-devil-like vortices occurred during the daytime after the ALB became well-developed. • Located at vertices or in the branches of convective cells. • ‘‘fishnet’’ patterns of wind field

  2. Instrument & Study Area Summary • The 3D-CDL was installed on the roof of the Creative Research Institution of Hokkaido University, Sapporo, at a height of 28 m above ground level (AGL). • The area covered by the 3D-CDL contained tall buildings to the south and low residential buildings to the north (Fig. 1). • The 3D-CDL employed a transmitter operating at a wavelength of 1.54 mm with 0.5 millijoules per pulse at a PRF of 4 kHz. • The beam- width was 0.1 m, and the detection range was 0.4–4.4 km, with a 50-m radial resolution. • Aspatial resolution of 92 m at a range of 4.4 km • The PPI scanned with an elevation angle of 2.2°, while RHI scans were made along the predominant wind direction (north-northwesterly)

  3. Detection of dust devil–like vortices • Doppler velocity data were excluded where SNR values were below a 4 dB threshold level. • To identify velocity measurements with low SNRs • Detection of dust devil-like vortices using the method presented by Suzuki et al. (2008): • 1) Calculated an absolute Doppler azimuthal shear from the Doppler velocity and estimated an azimuthal shear of > 3 x 10^-2 s^-1 • 2) Detected a pair of maximum and minimum Doppler velocities around the large azimuthal shear • 3) Fitted the pairs to the Rankine combined vortex model and calculated a correlation coefficient • 4) Selected vortices where correlation coefficients were >0.6. • The distance D between the maximum and minimum Doppler velocities was defined as the ‘deduced core diameter’ of a dust devil–like vortex. • Deduced vertical vorticity was estimated from 2ΔV/D

  4. Large Eddy Simulation Model • Observational data from the Doppler lider were compared to a dry version of an LES model from Nakanishi (2000). • TKE was determined diagnostically • Simulated open convective cells (fishnets) and the parent circulations of dust devil-like vortices. • Momentum flux determined from the Monin-Obukhov similarity theory, with a roughness length of 0.38 m (from Sugawara 2001). • Open convective cells, the ABL height, and ABL stability were well simulated as compared to observed data (Figure 2).

  5. Large Eddy Simulation Comparison

  6. Detection of dust devil–like vortices • Doppler velocity data were excluded where SNR values were below a 4 dB threshold level. • The deduced core diameters of the vortices ranged from 30 to 120 m, and maximum vorticity ranged from 0.15 to 0.26 s^-1 • These vortices occurred when the wind was relatively weak (<2.2 m/s) superadiabaticlapse rate of 1.1–2.0 x 10^-2 K/m • More than 60% of the vortices were cyclonic, and the rest were anticyclonic • Relatively strong dust devil–like vortices were detected only during the daytime (Table 1)and only after the ABL was well developed.

  7. Detection of dust devil–like vortices • Figure 6 shows a sample of a Doppler velocity, a radial convergence field, and the strongest dust devil–like vortex (A) detected from a PPI scan at 0932:01 JST 25 May 2005. • The pattern of the Doppler velocity field (Fig. 6a) and the radial convergence (Fig. 6b) was a fishnet. • Vortex A was located at the vertex of the radial convergence, which is consistent with previous LES results (Kanak et al. 2000; Kanak 2005).

  8. Detection of dust devil–like vortices • The Doppler velocity field around vortex A (Fig. 6e) and the distribution of its tangential velocity (Fig. 6f) had a structure that was similar to those of the Rankine combined vortex model. • The tangential component of the wind varied from -5.4 to +1.4 m/s. • The gray circle in Fig. 6e indicates the apparent core region based on the core diameter of the Doppler velocity signature. • The core diameter and the vertical vorticity of vortex A were estimated at 53 m and 0.26 s^1, respectively. • The SNR was weak in the vortex core (Fig. 6f) and was similar to the reflectivity structure of radar observations (Bluestein et al. 2004).

  9. Evolution & structure of dust devil–like vortices • On 14 April 2005, the 3D-CDL performed three sec- tor PPI scans at elevation angles of 2.2, 4.4, and 6.6 degin a 90 deg arc toward the northwest. • Two relatively strong vortices were detected from the sector PPI scans over a 24-min period from 1330 to 1354 JST • For Vortex B the horizontal distributions of the Doppler velocity field and the radial convergence at 1335:54 JST corresponded to a fishnet pattern.

  10. Evolution & structure of dust devil–like vortices • Vortex B was located at the wind convergence line (Fig. 7b), implying that it appeared within a convergence branch or at a vertex. • These observations are consistent with the simulations of Kanak et al. (2000) and Kanak (2005). • The three-dimensional structure of the Doppler velocity data clearly showed that vortex B extended to 200 m above the ground (Fig. 7c).

  11. Evolution & structure of dust devil–like vortices • Figure 8 shows that the vortex developed vertically within a few minutes • Vorticityincreased with time in association with decreasing diameter • Therefore, vortex stretching in the updraft region of the fishnet would have intensified the vertical vorticity. • Aline of radial convergence detected by a single Doppler lidar corresponded to either a vertex or a branch of vertical velocity.

  12. Summary • Fifty dust devil–like vortices were detected in Sapporo. • The diameters of the vortex cores and maximum vorticity ranged from 30 to 120 m and from 0.15 to 0.26 s^-1, respectively. • The vortices were detected only during the daytime and under relatively weak wind conditions (<2.2 m/s at 59.5 m AGL) with a deep boundary layer height (>650 m). • Their physical characteristics and conditions were similar to those observed over desert or flat areas. • Observed vortices appeared at vertices or in the branches of fishnets in the CBL in an urban area • Consistent with the results of the LES. • The observed vortices and convergence areas did not seem to be associated with particular topography or surface inhomogeneities. • Dust devil–like vortices initially formed along a low-level convergence line in a wind field with a fishnet structure and developed upward with time. • Vorticityincreased with a decrease in diameter, suggesting that vortex stretching might be responsible for intensifying the vertical vorticity.

More Related