1 / 41

Kinesin: How it Waits Between Steps

Kinesin: How it Waits Between Steps. Holly Durst. Harvard Biovisions: “The Inner Life of the Cell” http://multimedia.mcb.harvard.edu/. What is Kinesin?. dimeric motor protein carries cellular cargo along microtubules by hydrolyzing ATP

berny
Download Presentation

Kinesin: How it Waits Between Steps

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Kinesin: How it Waits Between Steps Holly Durst Harvard Biovisions: “The Inner Life of the Cell” http://multimedia.mcb.harvard.edu/

  2. What is Kinesin? • dimeric motor protein • carries cellular cargo along microtubules by hydrolyzing ATP • takes several hundred “steps” along a microtubule without detaching Harvard Biovisions: “The Inner Life of the Cell” http://multimedia.mcb.harvard.edu/

  3. Coiled coil β α Neck linkers • ATP binding to leading head initiates neck linker docking and the other head is thrown forward • New leading head docks onto binding site after diffusional search, resulting in 80 Å movement of attached cargo • This accelerates ADP release and trailing head hydrolyzes ATP to ADP-Pi • ATP binds to leading head

  4. FRET http://bio.physics.uiuc.edu/images/FRET_concept.jpg

  5. How kinesin waits between steps Teppei Mori, Ronald D. Vale & Michio Tomishige Objective • Use a series of smFRET experiments to detect whether kinesin is bound to its microtubule track by one or two heads in its ‘waiting’ conformation between steps

  6. The Players • ‘cysteine light’ human ubiquitous kinesin-1 dimer which cysteine residues and/or mutations were introduced into • Dye-labelled kinesins were imaged moving along sea-urchin axonemes with a custom-built prism-type laser-illuminated total-internal reflection fluorescence microscope

  7. Heterodimer one chain containing single cysteine residue in plus end oriented tip of core (residue 215) one chain containing single cysteine residue in minus-end oriented base of the core (residue 43) The Players Used two FRET Sensors:

  8. The Players 2. Homodimer with a cysteine residue in both chains at the beginning of the neck linker (residue 324)

  9. Testing the Sensors • Donor dye: Maleimide modified Cy3 • Acceptor dye: Maleimide modified Cy5 • Molecules that contained both dyes were selected for smFRET observations

  10. Examined FRET efficiency in presence of non-hydrolyzable nucleotide analog AMP-PNP so that both kinesin heads are bound statically to the microtubule Testing the Sensors

  11. Bimodal distribution of low (10%) and high (90%) As expected if two kinesin heads are bound to adjacent tubulin subunits 8 nm apart High peak – 43 dye on leading head and 215 dye on trailing head Low peak – 215 dye on leading head and 43 dye on trailing head Unimodal distribution centered at about 35% Is consistent with a two-head bound state Testing the Sensors smFRET Efficiencies for 215-43 smFRET Efficiencies for 324-324 Binding along single protofilament supported by experiments with a 149-324 sensor

  12. Different Conditions

  13. Different Conditions • Low ADP concentrations Remember: ADP occupying binding site = weak microtubule binding 215-43 Sensor unimodal at about 30% • 324-324 Sensor • shift from 35% to 60% • kinesin heads come closer together Under these conditions, these distributions reflect a one-head bound state

  14. Different Conditions • Low ADP plus excess inorganic phosphate • Partial occupancy of an ADP·Pi state in tethered head 324-324 Sensor 215-43 Sensor • Peaks characteristic of a two-head bound state • Similar results for addition of AlF4-

  15. Different Conditions • Both heads nucleotide free 215-43 Sensor 324-324 Sensor • distributions similar to AMP-PNP, but with broader distributions • Nucleotide-free kinesin primarily adopts a two-head bound state with partial occupancy of a one-head-bound state

  16. FRET efficiency trace of individual axoneme-bound 215-43 heterodimer kinesin

  17. Signal of 215-43 in AMP-PNP was fairly constant • A subset of molecules with ADP or ADP/Pi or under nucleotide-free conditions underwent abrupt FRET transitions • Unbinding and rebinding of kinesin head with microtubule

  18. Mutations • Mutated so only one head could bind to microtubules under all conditions • Y274A/R278A/K281A in loop 12 (L12-triple) • 215(WT) – 43 (L12) • 215(L12) – 43 (WT)

  19. Mutations

  20. Mutations • 200 nM ADP • 215(WT)-43(L12) and 215(L12)-43(WT) both produced unimodal distributions centered at about 30% • Distances between 43-labelled and 215 labelled dyes are similar • Similar result for nucleotide-free state

  21. Mutations • Addition of AMP-PNP • 215(WT)-43(L12) – bimodal with primary peak at 80% • 215(L12)-43(WT) – major peak shifted in opposite direction toward lower efficiencies • movement of L12 triple towards plus-end oriented tip of bound head

  22. Mutations • 215/342 dyes on wild-type chain to probe neck linker conformations in the bound head

  23. Mutations Translation of unbound head from rear position to forward position is driven by nucleotide-dependent docking of neck-linker

  24. Dynamic Measurements • Saturating ATP concentration (1 mM) • Can only measure an average

  25. Dynamic Measurements • 215-43 showed broad distribution centered at about 50% • Average of bimodal 10%, 90% FRET distribution of static two-head bound kinesin • Different from 30% value of one-head bound kinesin

  26. Dynamic Measurements • 324-324 unimodal distribution centered at about 30% Kinesin spends most of the time bound with two heads to the microtubule when moving at saturating ATP concentrations

  27. Dynamic Measurements • Subsaturating ATP concentration (2 μM)

  28. Dynamic Measurements • 215-43 shifted to about 30% • 324-324 shifted to about 60% • More similar to 200 nM ADP (one-head bound) Suggests that kinesin waits primarily as a one-head bound intermediate when ATP binding becomes the rate-limiting step in the ATPase cycle

  29. Dynamic Measurements • Longer dwell times at low ATP concentration

  30. Dynamic Measurements • Spent most time in a roughly 30% FRET state (one-head bound) with brief spikes towards higher (80%) FRET values • Higher values represent transient two-head bound intermediate state • Transitions from 30% to lower FRET state should also occur • Difficult to distinguish from noise

  31. Dynamic Measurements • Dwell-time histogram best fitted by a convolution of two exponentials • Two rate-limiting ATP binding events occur between the two high-FRET spikes

  32. Dynamic Measurements • Mean dwell time (140 ms) is comparable to predicted dwell time • Total number of spikes divided by displacement of these molecules yielded an average distance of about 17 nm per spike • Close to double kinesin step size

  33. Dynamic Measurements • A kinesin step at low ATP concentrations involves a short-lived, two-head bound state, which then undergoes a transition to a longer-lived, one-head bound state

  34. Summary • At high ATP concentration (the rate-limiting step is the detachment of the trailing head triggered by ATP hydrolysis/phosphate release), kinesin moves quickly from one two-head bound state to the next • At low ATP concentration (ATP binding to the leading head is rate-limiting), the trailing head releases its Pi and detaches from the microtubule, producing a long-lived one-head bound state

  35. Summary

  36. Discussion • Kinesin waits as either a one-head bound or two-head bound intermediate, depending on ATP concentration and the rate-limiting step

  37. Discussion • ATPase cycles in the two kinesin heads are coordinated during processive motion • Gating model proposes that detached head waits in front of bound head and is in a conformation that prevents it from binding tubulin • But, transient interactions with the microtubule are seen • Additional mechanism must keep detached head from progressing through ATPase cycle until its partner binds ATP

  38. Discussion • Detached head will not release ADP when it is interacting with rear tubulin-binding site • ADP release could occur after the bound head binds ATP and docks the neck-linker, translating the detached head to a forward tubulin-binding site • Results are supported by Guydosh and Block who showed that nucleotide dissociation occurs only when a head is in the forward position • Position dependence controlled by conformation of neck-linker

  39. Future Work • How does the conformation of the neck-linker affect transitions in the ATPase cycle?

  40. References • Mori, T.; Vale, R. D.; Tomishige, M. Nature2007, 450, 750-754 • Vale, R. D.; Milligan, R. A. Science2000, 288, 88-95

  41. QUESTIONS?

More Related