Demographics of Foster Care: Comparative Perspectives and Implications - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

benjamin
demographics of foster care comparative perspectives and implications l.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Demographics of Foster Care: Comparative Perspectives and Implications PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Demographics of Foster Care: Comparative Perspectives and Implications

play fullscreen
1 / 22
Download Presentation
Demographics of Foster Care: Comparative Perspectives and Implications
217 Views
Download Presentation

Demographics of Foster Care: Comparative Perspectives and Implications

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Demographics of Foster Care:Comparative Perspectives and Implications International Society for Child Indicators Chicago, Illinois June 26-28, 2007 Fred Wulczyn, Ph.D Chapin Hall Center for Children University of Chicago

  2. Purpose • Use age as a proxy for developmental issues to approximate how child development influences entry and exit patterns • Examine age patterns from a cross-national perspective • Frame the discussion of child well-being within this context

  3. Theory • The likelihood there will be a mismatch between the needs of a child and the ability of a parent to meet those needs is, on average, a function of a given child’s developmental stage. The same is true of intervention design. • The mismatch is aggravated by certain circumstances: human capital, social capital. For example, maltreatment and placement rates on average will be higher in poor counties. • However, if developmental issues are at play then holding context constant, distinct patterns should emerge.

  4. Implications All strategies of intervention, regardless of the target group or the desired outcomes, can be derived from the normative theories of child development . . . the general principles of development apply to all children independent of their biological variability or the range of environments in which they live. (Shonkoff and Phillips, 2000) In the case of child welfare, then, strategies of intervention in relation to well-being have to be directed at the developmental trajectories of children.

  5. Age as a Risk Factor

  6. Maltreatment Rates

  7. Type of Maltreatment

  8. Type of Maltreatment

  9. Age and Maltreatment:Census tracts

  10. Age and Maltreatment Type:Census Tracts

  11. Placement in Foster Care • Changing the context leaves the age patterns unchanged. • Time controls for period effects (policy changes, social and economic changes) • Place controls for social capital

  12. Age and Placement

  13. Age at Placement by Race

  14. Age at Placement by Urbanicity

  15. Age at Placement by Poverty Level

  16. Age at Placement by Poverty Level:Census Tracts

  17. Age at Placement

  18. Age at PlacementImproving Placement Rates

  19. Age in Relation to Outcomes • Age is a correlate of how a child will leave the system. • Again, the patterns emerge in ways that are largely independent of context: time and place.

  20. Leaving Placement • Family exits, which include reunification, guardianship, and exits to relatives(other than adoption) are most common among older children • However, among adolescents children who leave for other reasons (AWOL, aging out) account for many exits. • Basic patterns do not differ by race/ethnicity but the levels do. Likelihood of Exit by Age at Admission: African Americans Likelihood Exit by Age at Admission: Whites

  21. Leaving Foster Care Rate of Exit to Reunification by Age • Exit rates are tied closely to age • Adolescents move quickly to reunification relative to younger children • Adolescents move more slowly to adoption Rate of Exit to Adoption by Age

  22. Summary • Stable patterns in the age structure of the population suggest that even through historical periods (e.g., policy changes and socio-economic changes), age remains a durable determinant of risk. Similarly, age-differentiated patterns that persevere across geographic boundaries suggest that even variation in local “ecologies” is not enough to trump the importance of age as a defining determinant of maltreatment and the process of care. • “ . . . the general principles of development apply to all children independent of . . . the range of environments in which they live.” (Shonkoff and Phillips 2000, pg. 341) • Issues of development already permeate child welfare, yet policy and practice to a very large extent ignore these underlying realities. • The desire to introduce well-being into the outcome mix, however, puts developmental issues squarely in the middle of the debate.