a comparative reconstruction of moral relativism l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
A Comparative Reconstruction of Moral Relativism PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
A Comparative Reconstruction of Moral Relativism

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 52

A Comparative Reconstruction of Moral Relativism - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 192 Views
  • Uploaded on

A Comparative Reconstruction of Moral Relativism Mary I. Bockover Professor Humboldt State University Arcata, California United States of America Revised 6-06 Overall Sections Moral Relativism Incommensurable Conflict American Involvement in the War in Iraq

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'A Comparative Reconstruction of Moral Relativism' - benjamin


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
a comparative reconstruction of moral relativism

A Comparative Reconstruction of Moral Relativism

Mary I. Bockover

Professor

Humboldt State University

Arcata, California

United States of America

Revised 6-06

overall sections
Overall Sections
  • Moral Relativism
  • Incommensurable Conflict
  • American Involvement in the War in Iraq
slide4

“Moral Relativism” traditionally resulted from a debate that took the universal and the diverse to be mutually exclusive – i.e., either morality is universal or it is (culturally) relative, but not both.

slide5

“Moral Relativism” traditionally resulted from a debate that took the universal and the diverse to be mutually exclusive – i.e., either morality is universal or it is (culturally) relative, but not both.

      • the philosophical counterpart to a debate in the social sciences that contrasted “nature” and “nurture” in the same mutually exclusive way
slide6

“Moral Relativism” traditionally resulted from a debate that took the universal and the diverse to be mutually exclusive – i.e., either morality is universal or it is (culturally) relative, but not both.

      • the philosophical counterpart to a debate in the social sciences that contrasted “nature” and “nurture” in the same mutually exclusive way
      • the distinction between the “universal” and the “diverse” in ethics is a false dichotomy; morality can be both universal and diverse
slide7

“Moral Relativism” traditionally resulted from a debate that took the universal and the diverse to be mutually exclusive – i.e., either morality is universal or it is (culturally) relative, but not both.

      • the philosophical counterpart to a debate in the social sciences that contrasted “nature” and “nurture” in the same mutually exclusive way
      • the distinction between the “universal” and the “diverse” in ethics is a false dichotomy; morality can be both universal and diverse
      • moral consciousness, the normative “ground” from which moral judgment grows is universal
slide8

“Moral Relativism” traditionally resulted from a debate that took the universal and the diverse to be mutually exclusive – i.e., either morality is universal or it is (culturally) relative, but not both.

      • the philosophical counterpart to a debate in the social sciences that contrasted “nature” and “nurture” in the same mutually exclusive way
      • the distinction between the “universal” and the “diverse” in ethics is a false dichotomy; morality can be both universal and diverse
      • moral consciousness, the normative “ground” from which moral judgment grows is universal
      • moraljudgment is relative despite this common ground, or will depend on what is valued (even within the same cultural context this can vary dramatically)
slide9

“Moral Relativism” traditionally resulted from a debate that took the universal and the diverse to be mutually exclusive – i.e., either morality is universal or it is (culturally) relative, but not both.

      • the philosophical counterpart to a debate in the social sciences that contrasted “nature” and “nurture” in the same mutually exclusive way
      • the distinction between the “universal” and the “diverse” in ethics is a false dichotomy; morality can be both universal and diverse
      • moral consciousness, the normative “ground” from which moral judgment grows is universal
      • moraljudgment is relative despite this common ground, or will depend on what is valued (even within the same cultural context this can vary dramatically)

Moral consciousness is too general to resolve conflict.

moral values judgments principles truth12
Moral Values, Judgments, Principles & Truth
  • A moral value is entailed in more specific moral judgments
moral values judgments principles truth13
Moral Values, Judgments, Principles & Truth
  • A moral value is entailed in more specific moral judgments
  • Moral judgment deems that some value should be put into practice, or some practice stopped that is in violation of it or is based on some other competing value
moral values judgments principles truth14
Moral Values, Judgments, Principles & Truth
  • A moral value is entailed in more specific moral judgments
  • Moral judgment deems that some value should be put into practice, or some practice stopped that is in violation of it or is based on some other competing value
  • Ordinarily what we value the most is not reflectively identified and defined; the work of (second-order) ethics
moral values judgments principles truth15
Moral Values, Judgments, Principles & Truth
  • A moral value is entailed in more specific moral judgments
  • Moral judgment deems that some value should be put into practice, or some practice stopped that is in violation of it or is based on some other competing value
  • Ordinarily what we value the most is not reflectively identified and defined; the work of (second-order) ethics
  • A moral value can be reflectively articulated so to constitute a “first principle”, e.g., of an ethical theory
moral values judgments principles truth16
Moral Values, Judgments, Principles & Truth
  • A moral value is entailed in more specific moral judgments
  • Moral judgment deems that some value should be put into practice, or some practice stopped that is in violation of it or is based on some other competing value
  • Ordinarily what we value the most is not reflectively identified and defined; the work of (second-order) ethics
  • A moral value can be reflectively articulated so to constitute a “first principle”, e.g., of an ethical theory
  • A “first principle” articulates the most fundamental value of a particular view, e.g., “happiness”, “freedom”, “benevolence”
moral values judgments principles truth17
Moral Values, Judgments, Principles & Truth
  • A moral value is entailed in more specific moral judgments
  • Moral judgment deems that some value should be put into practice, or some practice stopped that is in violation of it or is based on some other competing value
  • Ordinarily what we value the most is not reflectively identified and defined; the work of (second-order) ethics
  • A moral value can be reflectively articulated so to constitute a “first principle”, e.g., of an ethical theory
  • A “first principle” articulates the most fundamental value of a particular view, e.g., “happiness”, “freedom”, “benevolence”
  • Moral judgments are value-judgments, and are relative because there is no independent, objective standard that can determine their truth or resolve conflicts between them
why a moral conflict becomes incommensurable20
Why a Moral Conflict Becomes Incommensurable
  • First, there are so many values that can be the most fundamental (first) principle for those who believe in them
why a moral conflict becomes incommensurable21
Why a Moral Conflict Becomes Incommensurable
  • First, there are so many values that can be the most fundamental (first) principle for those who believe in them
  • Second, circumstances are such that one of these values is judged to have moral priority by one person, group, or culture, etc., and this conflicts with another value judged to have moral priority by another person, group, or culture
why a moral conflict becomes incommensurable22
Why a Moral Conflict Becomes Incommensurable
  • First, there are so many values that can be the most fundamental (first) principle for those who believe in them
  • Second, circumstances are such that one of these values is judged to have moral priority by one person, group, or culture, etc., and this conflicts with another value judged to have moral priority by another person, group, or culture
  • And third, the normative nature of moral judgment is such that deciding which value is superior can only appeal back to what is valued instead of a common standard which could objectively determine their truth
the problem of moral incommensurability24
The Problem of Moral Incommensurability
  • Moral consciousness is the universal ground from which moral value grows; but paradoxically also supplies the ground from which moral difference, even incommensurable conflict, takes root
the problem of moral incommensurability25
The Problem of Moral Incommensurability
  • Moral consciousness is the universal ground from which moral value grows; but paradoxically also supplies the ground from which moral difference, even incommensurable conflict, takes root
  • There is no way to get outside of one’s own “values system” to judge which view is ultimately right or wrong, better or worse, without begging the question of what should be valued the most
the problem of moral incommensurability26
The Problem of Moral Incommensurability
  • Moral consciousness is the universal ground from which moral value grows; but paradoxically also supplies the ground from which moral difference, even incommensurable conflict, takes root
  • There is no way to get outside of one’s own “values system” to judge which view is ultimately right or wrong, better or worse, without begging the question of what should be valued the most
  • Objective arguments can only be made based on whether the reasons used to justify putting some value into practice are consistent, or whether the supporting facts are sound
some reasons for the war support our troops29
Some Reasons for the War“Support our Troops”
  • Clear proof that WMD had been manufactured
some reasons for the war support our troops30
Some Reasons for the War“Support our Troops”
  • Clear proof that WMD had been manufactured
  • Clear proof that Iraq had capacity to deliver them
some reasons for the war support our troops31
Some Reasons for the War“Support our Troops”
  • Clear proof that WMD had been manufactured
  • Clear proof that Iraq had capacity to deliver them
  • A dramatically conflicted relationship between Iraq (under Hussein) and the U.S.A. (since George Bush, Sr.)
some reasons for the war support our troops32
Some Reasons for the War“Support our Troops”
  • Clear proof that WMD had been manufactured
  • Clear proof that Iraq had capacity to deliver them
  • A dramatically conflicted relationship between Iraq (under Hussein) and the U.S.A. (since George Bush, Sr.)
  • Iraq’s contempt for the United Nations
some reasons for the war support our troops33
Some Reasons for the War“Support our Troops”
  • Clear proof that WMD had been manufactured
  • Clear proof that Iraq had capacity to deliver them
  • A dramatically conflicted relationship between Iraq (under Hussein) and the U.S.A. (since George Bush, Sr.)
  • Iraq’s contempt for the United Nations
  • Evidence gathered by the Security Council of Iraqi terrorist cells
some reasons against the war peace is patriotic36
Some Reasons against the War“Peace is Patriotic”
  • On principle or on religious grounds, believing that the inevitable loss of innocent life – though not intentional – cannot be justified even if the goal is to remove a despot who intentionally does even worse
some reasons against the war peace is patriotic37
Some Reasons against the War“Peace is Patriotic”
  • On principle or on religious grounds, believing that the inevitable loss of innocent life – though not intentional – cannot be justified even if the goal is to remove a despot who intentionally does even worse
  • Like the French and Germans, many Americans also thought there was not enough evidence that WMD were still being produced to make the national defense argument succeed
some reasons against the war peace is patriotic38
Some Reasons against the War“Peace is Patriotic”
  • On principle or on religious grounds, believing that the inevitable loss of innocent life – though not intentional – cannot be justified even if the goal is to remove a despot who intentionally does even worse
  • Like the French and Germans, many Americans also thought there was not enough evidence that WMD were still being produced to make the national defense argument succeed
  • Still others held that even if there were, war was not justified at the time because of the lack of international support
critique abroad of u s a s invasion of iraq40
Critique Abroad of U.S.A.’s Invasion of Iraq
  • Failure to get greater U.N. support and to find evidence of WMD
critique abroad of u s a s invasion of iraq41
Critique Abroad of U.S.A.’s Invasion of Iraq
  • Failure to get greater U.N. support and to find evidence of WMD
  • Failure to provide adequate support for the many innocent Iraqis harmed by the war
critique abroad of u s a s invasion of iraq42
Critique Abroad of U.S.A.’s Invasion of Iraq
  • Failure to get greater U.N. support and to find evidence of WMD
  • Failure to provide adequate support for the many innocent Iraqis harmed by the war
  • Critical differences in value between Iraqi culture and ours, e.g, the value of political freedom that we take to be an “inalienable” and “universal” human right derives from a Western concept of person that most of the world, including much of Iraq, does not obviously share
critique abroad of u s a s invasion of iraq43
Critique Abroad of U.S.A.’s Invasion of Iraq
  • Failure to get greater U.N. support and to find evidence of WMD
  • Failure to provide adequate support for the many innocent Iraqis harmed by the war
  • Critical differences in value between Iraqi culture and ours, e.g, the value of political freedom that we take to be an “inalienable” and “universal” human right derives from a Western concept of person that most of the world, including much of Iraq, does not obviously share
  • Failure to have a clear exit strategy (and this administration has said that U.S. armed forces will likely remain in Iraq for at least a decade)
critique abroad of u s a s invasion of iraq44
Critique Abroad of U.S.A.’s Invasion of Iraq
  • Failure to get greater U.N. support and to find evidence of WMD
  • Failure to provide adequate support for the many innocent Iraqis harmed by the war
  • Critical differences in value between Iraqi culture and ours, e.g, the value of political freedom that we take to be an “inalienable” and “universal” human right derives from a Western concept of person that most of the world, including much of Iraq, does not obviously share
  • Failure to have a clear exit strategy (and this administration has said that U.S. armed forces will likely remain in Iraq for at least a decade)
  • Iraq is the second largest untapped oil source in the world, and that the American way of life has made no great strides to become less dependent on fossil fuel (oil factor argument)
support abroad of u s a s invasion of iraq46
Support Abroad of U.S.A.’s Invasion of Iraq
  • Given that legal and moral justifications are related, but distinct, the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003 could, after the fact, be deemed illegal but could also be deemed moral or even obligatory on different grounds
support abroad of u s a s invasion of iraq47
Support Abroad of U.S.A.’s Invasion of Iraq
  • Given that legal and moral justifications are related, but distinct, the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003 could, after the fact, be deemed illegal but could also be deemed moral or even obligatory on different grounds
  • One reason the U.N. was established after WWII was to keep despots like Hitler and Stalin from coming to power and reeking havoc on the world again; no longer a legal justification for war but still could be a moral one
support abroad of u s a s invasion of iraq48
Support Abroad of U.S.A.’s Invasion of Iraq
  • Given that legal and moral justifications are related, but distinct, the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003 could, after the fact, be deemed illegal but could also be deemed moral or even obligatory on different grounds
  • One reason the U.N. was established after WWII was to keep despots like Hitler and Stalin from coming to power and reeking havoc on the world again; no longer a legal justification for war but still could be a moral one
  • So it was argued that removing Hussein was morally justified, as long as innocent civilian life was not intentionally sacrificed to do it
support abroad of u s a s invasion of iraq49
Support Abroad of U.S.A.’s Invasion of Iraq
  • Given that legal and moral justifications are related, but distinct, the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003 could, after the fact, be deemed illegal but could also be deemed moral or even obligatory on different grounds
  • One reason the U.N. was established after WWII was to keep despots like Hitler and Stalin from coming to power and reeking havoc on the world again; no longer a legal justification for war but still could be a moral one
  • So it was argued that removing Hussein was morally justified, as long as innocent civilian life was not intentionally sacrificed to do it
  • Americans often can afford to take the idealistic perspective of judging peace to have moral priority over freedom (the political freedom of Iraqi people) since their freedom is not directly at stake, while (military) American life is
support abroad of u s a s invasion of iraq50
Support Abroad of U.S.A.’s Invasion of Iraq
  • Given that legal and moral justifications are related, but distinct, the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003 could, after the fact, be deemed illegal but could also be deemed moral or even obligatory on different grounds
  • One reason the U.N. was established after WWII was to keep despots like Hitler and Stalin from coming to power and reeking havoc on the world again; no longer a legal justification for war but still could be a moral one
  • So it was argued that removing Hussein was morally justified, as long as innocent civilian life was not intentionally sacrificed to do it
  • Americans often can afford to take the idealistic perspective of judging peace to have moral priority over freedom (the political freedom of Iraqi people) since their freedom is not directly at stake, while (military) American life is
  • It is important for Americans to remember the lessons of WWI and WWII, especially from the perspective of those who required the help of others to preserve their own freedom and did not get it (or did not get it in time)