EU Regional Policy: an overview - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

eu regional policy an overview n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
EU Regional Policy: an overview PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
EU Regional Policy: an overview

play fullscreen
1 / 29
Download Presentation
EU Regional Policy: an overview
Download Presentation

EU Regional Policy: an overview

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. EU Regional Policy: an overview DG Regional Policy European Commission

  2. Outline of today’s presentation • What is it EU regional policy? • Why do we bother with a regional policy? • How much does it cost? • What do we spend the money on? • Is it worth it?

  3. What is EU Regional Policy? • Regional policy is the vehicle for delivering regional aid • Biggest slice of the EU budget which helps: • poorer regions catch up • areas undergoing economic change to restructure • with the realisation of most other Community policies

  4. EU Budget 2007-2013

  5. What is its purpose? • The EU is one of the world’s most prosperous economic zones • But huge disparities exist among the 271 EU regions – weakens the EU’s dynamism • Hence the political goal of reducing the gaps in development

  6. How does it do this? Regional policy interventions to reduce disparities and promote economic convergence are spread through 3 funds: • ERDF: European Regional Development Fund • ESF: European Social Fund and… • Cohesion Fund (applies to MS with <90% average GNI and covers the new member states as well as Greece and Portugal. Spain is eligible on a transitional basis) ….financing thousands of project across Europe each year

  7. Why do we bother? • It is in the treaty “to promote economic and social cohesion by reducing disparities between the regions” • Leaving disparities in place is not an option thatwould wreck two of the policies on which Europe’s growth has been based: the single market and the European Monetary Union (EMU)

  8. <50 50 - 75 75 - 90 90 - 100 100 - 125 ³ 125 Differences in development in the EU-27 GDP per head as a % of the community average

  9. EU 27 Member States GDP per capita in PPS in 2006Source: Eurostat structural indicatorsEU 27= 100

  10. Disparities across the European Union *In US, this difference is only 2.5 and Japan 2

  11. How much does it cost? One third of the EU budget 2007-2013€347 billion over 7 years

  12. What does the EU citizen get for this? The three funds target: • ERDF (€201 billion): regional development, economic decline in industrial or rural areas, competitiveness and co-operation • (ESF) (€76 billion):employment, social inclusion and tackling discrimination • Cohesion Fund (€70 billion): environment and transport with overarching aim of “boosting growth and employment”

  13. Adaptability of workers and firms Social inclusion Capacity building Technical assistance What do we spend the money on? European Regional Development Fund and Cohesion Fund (€271 billion) European Social Fund (€76 billion) Employment Environment Transport Human capital Research/Innovation Information society Tourism Social infrastructure Culture Energy Institutional capacity

  14. Does this fit with other EU priorities? • Boosting growth and employment central to the wider EU agenda – “Lisbon Strategy” • Lisbon is the EU’s blueprint for competiveness and sustainable growth • Prioritises: • increasing levels of innovation to help businesses move up the value chain • Bringing more of Europe’s population into employment

  15. Boosting growth and jobs: is regional policy putting this into practice? • Concentration of the effort on competitiveness (21st century activities) • Member States must ‘earmark’ resources on such strategic investments (€230 billion now targeted on Lisbon priorities) • Concentration of resources on least prosperous • Regions with GDP per head below 75% of EU average: over ¼ of population • Member States with GDP per head below 90% of average: 13 MS with 25% of population

  16. Who gets what? • Convergence 81.9% (regions lagging behind the most) • Competitiveness 15.7% • Territorial co-operation 2.4% • Total budget €347bn, which will unlock up to €700bn A method based on what works: Programming, Partnership and Decentralised Management

  17. Convergence objective (Regions < 75% in EU 25) Objective 'Regional Competitiveness and Employment' Geographical Eligibility for Structural Funds Support 2007-2013 Convergence objective statistically affected regions Objective 'Regional Competitiveness and Employment' Phasing-in regions, "naturally" above 75% Index EU 25 = 100 Source: Eurostat

  18. Who can apply for funds? • Huge range of potential recipients: • Businesses including SMEs • Public bodies • Associations • Voluntary groups • All projects considered if meet selection criteria of managing authority of relevant programme • Compulsory publication of beneficiary lists

  19. Is it worth it? • Evidence suggests positive contribution to growth, national convergence and reduction of interregional disparities • Ex-post evaluations demonstrate positive employment effects • Clear benefits in terms of regional governance • Since 2000, investments have created some 600,000 net jobs, 160,000 in new Member States. • Every euro invested led to an average € 0.9 in additional funding from public and private sources. In more developed regions, this induced expenditure can go as high as 3 times the initial investment.

  20. Some outputs….. • Increasing per capita GDP in Greece, Spain, Ireland and Portugal – ( Greece increased from 74% of the EU average to 88% between 1995 and 2005) • Helping to reduce income disparities between richest and poorest by roughly a sixth (between 2000 and 2005) through sustained high growth • By 2015, it is estimated that regional policy will have generated an additional 440,000 jobs in Poland, as well as contributing an extra 6% to GDP and 21% to investment • Over 44,000 km of road were built or reconstructed in the period 2000-2006. The equivalent figure for rail was nearly 12,000 km • Supporting more than 250,000 small businesses in the UK • Over 25,000 RTD co-operation projects were supported in the period 2000-2006

  21. What is the added value? • Leverage effect of additional resources • Multi-annual planning, partnership, monitoring and evaluation • Support for other EU objectives such as internal market, sustainable development • Ring-fencing public resources • Interregional cooperation and sharing of best practice But • Complexity of management and control structures • Reality on ground can be very variable • Unclear in some MS if effects are consistent or attributable to policy • Effectiveness of monitoring and evaluation undermined by poor data Source: Cohesion Report, Bachtler and Gorzelak

  22. A success story? Tram system in Athens

  23. Regional incubation centre in Ireland

  24. The Guggenheim effect in Bilbao

  25. Innovation centre in Czech Republic

  26. Motorway near San Sebastian

  27. Centre for renewable energies in Burgenland

  28. Five things to remember • It has successfully reduced the gaps between regions in Europe and made a major contribution to prosperity and democratic stability. • 2. It has improved management and governance in the regions by decentralising management and devolving responsibility: the Commission does not select projects! • 3. It is, with research, the EU’s biggest budget heading; • 4. It works by investing in infrastructure, training, innovation and research. No hand outs. • 5. Its success is recognised by all candidate countries and by many • others (China, S. Africa, Russia, Brazil…)

  29. For more information… THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION! Any questions?