1 / 28

On-farm Water Management: from efficiency to productivity

On-farm Water Management: from efficiency to productivity. Theib Oweis Director of Integrated Water & Land Management Program International Center of Agricultural research in the Dry Areas. Southern Mediterranean. Why improving efficiency?. Increased water scarcity

benard
Download Presentation

On-farm Water Management: from efficiency to productivity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. On-farm Water Management: from efficiency to productivity Theib Oweis Director of Integrated Water & Land Management Program International Center of Agricultural research in the Dry Areas

  2. Southern Mediterranean Why improving efficiency? • Increased water scarcity • Declining agricultural water • Need for more food • Sustaining the ecosystems • Water for other sectors

  3. Efficiency Output Efficiency =------------100% Input • Same units • Normally % • < 100% Implies losses during the process

  4. Two groups of Efficiencies 1. Irrigation systems efficiencies • Application efficiency • Convenience efficiency • Storage efficiency 2. Farm or crop use efficacies • Water use efficiency • Transpiration efficiency • Farm water use efficiency

  5. Typical furrow irrigation system

  6. Transpiration Precipitation Evaporation Runoff Irrigation Storage Seepage Drainage Deep percolation Field water balance

  7. Water stored (mm) Application Efficiency---------------------------x100% Water applied (mm) • Reflects losses in deep percolation and runoff • Does not reflect root zone satisfaction • %

  8. Water stored (mm) Storage efficiency= -----------------------------100% Water needed (mm) • Reflects how full is the root zone • Ignores deep percolation • %

  9. Water delivered to farm Conveyance eff. = ------------------------------100% Water diverted from source • Reflects seepage, evaporation and weeds use losses • %

  10. One can under irrigate No DP / 100% application Eff 50% storage Eff. One can over irrigate 100% storage efficiency 50 % application efficiency Sprinkler irrigation

  11. Over irrigation • Application eff. 50% • Storage eff. 100% Trickle irrigation • Under irrigation • Application eff. 100% • Storage eff. 50%

  12. Issues of irrigation efficiencies • Reflects the performance of irrigation system (engineering aspects) • Ignores recoverable losses ??? • Nothing to do with the return to water • Wrongly used to judge the whole farm water management system

  13. Farm Efficiencies Production (Kg) WUE = ---------------------------- Water used ( m3) Units are mainly production / volume of water No standard type of production (biomass, grain, roots ???) No standard water used (applied, stored, ET, ???)

  14. Biomass production (kg) Transpiration Eff.= --------------------------------- Transpiration (mm) Ignores evaporation losses Reflects plant performance Not %

  15. New concept (Shideed, Oweis and Gabr 2000) Water required to produce (x) in mm Farm WUE = --------------------------------------------------100% Water used to produce (x) in mm • Reflects farmer’s performance • Considers local environment specifity • Can be used for farm multi-cropping • %

  16. Transpiration Precipitation Evaporation Losses Runoff recoverable Irrigation Storage Seepage recoverable Drainage Partially recoverable Quality losses Deep percolation To ground water recoverable Field water balance

  17. Issues of irrigation losses • Recoverable losses: • are not real / only on paper losses • economic issue at the farm (cost to recover) • management issue at the scheme and basin • + or - environmental issues (leach out salts) • Real losses may not be recovered: • Evaporation • Transpiration (productive) • Non beneficial uses (weeds)

  18. What return ?? • Biomass, grain, meat, milk (kg) • Income ($) • Environmental benefits (C) • Social benefits (employment) • Energy (Cal) • Nutrition (protein, carbohydrates, fat) • What water ?? • Quality (EC) • Location (GW depth) • Time available • Consumed (depleted) • Evaporation • Transpiration • Quality deterioration Water productivity: a broader framework Return WP = --------------------------------- Unit of water consumed

  19. Saline water equivalent Oweis et al 2011

  20. Potential water productivityimprovement

  21. Scales and drivers to increase WP • At the basin level: • competition among uses (Env., Ag., Dom.) • conflicts between countries • Equity issues • At the national level: • food security • hard currency • sociopolitics • At the farm level: • maximizing economic return • Nutrition in subsistence farming • At the field level: • maximizing biological output

  22. Max WP Max Yield Tradeoffs between water & land productivity

  23. Potential WP improvements • Reducing evaporation • Improving management • Enhancing genetic resources • Great potential in developing countries

  24. What to grow under scarcity ?? • Traditional farming: hard to change • Water productivity: what productivity ?? • National food security, self sufficiency • Virtual water ???

  25. Potential practices • Supplemental irrigation • Deficit irrigation • Germplasm • Cultural practices • Water harvesting

  26. Irrigated agriculture • Increasing water productivity • Deficit irrigation • Modifying cropping patterns • Cultural practices • Management of marginal water and soil • Secondary salinity • Reuse of treated wastewater • Improving irrigation systems performance

  27. Modernizing irrigation: water savings ! • Does irrigation modernization save water ? • YES • Does increasing Irrigation Efficiency from 50% to 80% save 30% water? • NO • How much saving then? Depends on: • System changed and system adopted • Irrigation management • Crops and pattern • Mostly in reducing evaporation and non beneficial use • Needs assessment • Is it worth the cost? Needs research

  28. Modern systems: productivity • Higher productivity is not only associated with water savings. Drip irrigation does: • Provide better soil water due to frequent irrigation • Fertigation more frequent and uniform • Weed control through • The cost: • Investment, Maintenance, Skill • Salt accumulation needs periodical flushing • Modernizing surface irrigation, very good idea

More Related