energy policy and energy efficiency n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Energy Policy and Energy Efficiency PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Energy Policy and Energy Efficiency

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 67

Energy Policy and Energy Efficiency - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 116 Views
  • Uploaded on

Energy Policy and Energy Efficiency. James Sweeney Stanford University Director, Precourt Institute for Energy Efficiency Professor, Management Science and Engineering. Policy Drivers. Environmental Protection Global Climate Change Security Oil/International vulnerability

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Energy Policy and Energy Efficiency' - umika


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
energy policy and energy efficiency

Energy Policy and Energy Efficiency

James Sweeney

Stanford University

Director, Precourt Institute for Energy Efficiency

Professor, Management Science and Engineering

policy drivers
Policy Drivers
  • Environmental Protection
    • Global Climate Change
  • Security
    • Oil/International vulnerability
    • Vulnerability of infrastructure to terrorism, natural disaster, or human error
  • Economics
    • Prices of electricity, gasoline, natural gas
    • Price volatility: oil, natural gas, wholesale electricity
slide3
Policy Pushes: U.S. and California
  • Reducing greenhouse gas emissions
    • Mechanisms: Market based; Command and Control
    • Energy Efficiency: Automobile Fuel Economy
    • Alternative Fuels: Ethanol, Biodiesel
  • Energy Infrastructure Investments
    • U.S. Oil Exploration
    • LNG terminals
  • Energy Technology Development
    • “Green” -- Low greenhouse gas energy
    • Energy Efficient technologies
slide6

Petroleum

Natural Gas

End-Use Consumption

Residential

Industrial

Commercial

Transportation

Coal

Hydro-resource

Electricity Generation

Nuclear Fuel

Geothermal

Wind

Solar

slide9

Energy-Crisis, High Prices

Pre-Energy-Crisis, Low Prices

Low Prices Through 2003

us per capita total energy use
US Per Capita Total Energy Use

1974

Source: EIA, Annual Energy Review

fossil fuels account for
Fossil fuels account for
  • 98% of the US carbon dioxide net releases into the atmosphere
  • 82% of the releases of greenhouse gases, measured on a carbon equivalent basis.
u s co 2 emissions by sector and fuels 2004
U.S. CO2 Emissions by Sector and Fuels 2004

Source: U.S. EPA Inventory of Greenhouse Gas Emissions, April 2006

carbon dioxide releases 2002 actual 2020 projections
Carbon Dioxide Releases: 2002 Actual, 2020 Projections

Source: International Energy Outlook 2005 (US Dept of Energy)

slide16
Production of oil concentrated into unstable areas of the world
  • Sudden supply reductions can sharply increase oil price
    • Short run demand elasticity about - 0.1 to - 0.2
    • Percentage price increase will be 5 to 10 times the percentage supply reduction
  • Sudden oil price increases can lead to worldwide recession
  • Petroleum revenues fund terrorist activities
ownership of oil industry
Ownership of oil industry
  • The largest 13 firms – as measured by oil and gas reserves – are all owned by nations or are controlled by other nations
  • Oil supply may be manipulated for political purposes by those nations controlling the reserves
oil and gas reserves billion barrels oil equivalent
Oil and Gas Reserves, Billion Barrels Oil Equivalent

State Owned/Controlling Interest.Private Sector Owned

crude oil prices
Crude Oil prices
  • Crude Oil prices are currently high
  • Prices on futures markets suggest that crude oil prices are most likely to further increase
  • World demand continues to grow
    • Development of China and increase in the number of passenger cars
    • India is likely to follow
  • Expectation that conventional oil supply may peak soon
  • Incentives for dominant suppliers to limit investment in new production capacity so as to keep prices
  • Incentives for dominant suppliers to keep future prices uncertain so as to limit competitive investments
price risk
Price Risk
  • Possible to estimate probability distribution of future oil prices by observing options based on the futures market
    • Puts and calls are priced in the market
    • Prices of puts and calls reflect the beliefs of market participants about price uncertainty
  • Significant uncertainty in the near term
    • Uncertainty increases over time
  • Data quality
    • Relatively good through 2007
    • OK, but limited to December 2009
  • Risk of either very low or very high prices
slide26

Decreased Energy Use

Reduced EconomicEfficiency

Increased EconomicEfficiency

Increased Energy Use

slide27

Decreased Energy Use

Energy Efficiency Improvement

Inefficient Energy Saving

Increased EconomicEfficiency

Economically Efficient Energy Intensification

Waste

slide28

Decreased Energy Use

“Smart Buildings” Controls

LED General Lighting (Future)

“Smart” Local Land Development

Energy Audits

Restrict SUV Sales

LED Traffic Lights

Tighter CAFE Standards

Plug-In Hybrids (Now)

Gasoline Rationing

Plug-In Hybrids (Future)

Optimized Building Construction

Compact Fluorescent Penetration

Energy Star Labeling

Overly Strict Building Standards

Hybrid Gas-Electric Vehicles

Pigouvian Energy Tax

Some Rapid Transit Systems

Congestion Pricing

Increased EconomicEfficiency

Internet Growth

Many Rapid Transit Systems

LED General Lighting (Now)

Personal Computer Penetration

Economic development

Promote Incan-descent Lighting

Rural Electrification

Airline Deregulation

Gasoline Price Controls

Plasma TVs

some sources of efficiency failures
Some Sources of Efficiency Failures
  • Externalities of Energy Use
    • Global Climate Change
    • Risks of Energy Price Shocks
    • Limitations on our Foreign Policy Options
    • Terms of Trade Impacts (Pecuniary “Externalities”)
    • Safety externality in autos
  • Pricing Below Marginal Cost
    • Non-time-differentiated Electricity Pricing
  • Information Asymmetry
    • Consumer Product Marketing
    • New Building Construction
  • Incomplete Technology Options
    • Under-investment
    • Sub-optimal technology directions, due to externalities
  • Non-Convexities
    • Learning By Doing Technology Spillovers
    • “Chicken and Egg” Problems
commercial building energy uses
Commercial Building Energy Uses

Source: 2006 Buildings Energy Data Book

lighting as share of u s electricity
Lighting as Share of U.S. Electricity
  • Lighting use
    • About 800 Terawatt hours (1012) per year
  • Electricity Generation
    • 3815 Terawatt hours per year
  • Lighting is 21% of all electricity use
slide34

From “U.S. Lighting Market Characterization”, prepared for DOE EERE by Navigant Consulting, 2002

slide35

From “U.S. Lighting Market Characterization”, prepared for DOE EERE by Navigant Consulting, 2002

slide36

Residential 900 Lumen Lighting

20 year Lifecycle Cost (Now)

slide37

Commercial 900 Lumen Lighting

20 year Lifecycle Cost (Now)

slide39

Residential 900 Lumen Lighting

20 year Lifecycle Cost (In 5 – 10 Years)

slide40

Commercial 900 Lumen Lighting

20 year Lifecycle Cost (In 5 – 10 Years)

economy wide impacts of all led
Economy-Wide Impacts of All LED
  • Lighting use: 21% of all electricity use
    • All LED saves about 60% of this electricity in long run:
      • 13% of all electricity use – after all adjustments
    • Adjustment time:
      • How long until LED system efficacy reaches 120 lm/wt? 5 years?
      • 50% adoption: 15 years afterwards?
    • 50% adoption will save 6.5% of all electricity use
  • Electricity impact: Perhaps 6.5% reduction in 20 years
  • Electricity cost impact
    • Total cost of U.S. electricity
      • Retail: $300 Billion per year
      • Variable Costs: say $200 Billion per year
    • 6.5% of $300 Billion dollars = $20 Billion per year
    • 6.5% of $200 Billion dollars = $13 Billion per year
forces shaping energy use
Forces Shaping Energy Use
  • Transport Sector
    • Chosen Level of Mobility
      • Income and Free-time Dependant
      • Urban/Suburban/rural land use patterns
    • Modes of Transport (personal vehicle, airplane, bus, trains)
      • Value of Time
      • Costs of Alternatives (Influenced by oil price)
      • Availability of Alternatives
    • Vehicle Characteristics
      • Performance
      • Size
      • Engine, Drive Train Technologies
      • Choices influenced by oil price
change of senate and house majorities
Change of Senate and House Majorities
  • CO2 mitigation will be a major push
    • Senate Energy Committee leadership change
  • Cap-and-Trade system for carbon management under debate
    • Study Group Developed
    • Group does not have rights to draft legislation
  • More direct regulations are likely also
supreme court decision on carbon dioxide
Supreme Court Decision on Carbon Dioxide
  • Carbon Dioxide can be regulated under the Clean Air Act
  • States can regulate carbon dioxide emissions
california s ab 32
California’s AB 32
  • Market based instruments
    • Allowed but not required
    • May face opposition from legislature
  • Development of Cap-and-Trade system
    • Under way through Cal EPA and CARB
  • Executive Order on Carbon content of fuels
    • Average Content
    • Including hydrogen and electricity
    • Trading system
    • To be designed
other california rules
Other California Rules
  • Autos: Pavley Bill
    • CO2 limits on average of new vehicles
    • Under court challenge
      • But Supreme Court decision should help greatly
  • Utility regulation
    • Renewable Portfolio Standard
    • Responsibility for CO2 content of electricity, where ever the electricity generated
  • Other regulations
    • Buildings standards
    • Plug load standards
political bottom line
Political Bottom Line
  • Many changes to be expected
  • Regulations still be developed
  • High payoff for getting involved in the process
    • Many groups are involved; interests vary across groups
    • Personal involvement can make great difference
bottom line
Bottom Line
  • Increases of economic efficiency can be accomplished through decreases of energy use – energy efficiency improvements
    • In principle, based on understanding of market failures
    • In practice, based on observations of options and human choices
    • In practice, based on technology and systems innovation
  • The potential, I believe, is large for improvements in energy efficiency
get prices right
Get Prices Right
  • Oil
    • The world oil price is passed through to the economy
    • International security externality not included
    • CO2 externality not included
    • Other travel externalities not included
      • Congestion
      • Highway/Road mortality/injury
      • Criteria pollutants
    • Thus price we pay for gasoline is too low
get prices right1
Get Prices Right
  • US oil price should include an international security externality premium/tax/fee
    • Gasoline tax
    • Higher CAFE standards on light duty vehicles
  • Prices for oil substitutes should not be kept artificially high
    • Import tax on ethanol -- $.54 per gallon -- should be eliminated
get prices right2
Get Prices Right
  • CO2
    • Need US national carbon dioxide cap-and-trade system
      • The United States could implement a cap and trade system even if we do not ratify Kyoto protocol
    • System can be implemented
      • The nations that have ratified the Kyoto protocol now are operating such a system
      • Currently states are beginning to implement such systems, but a national system would be preferable
      • We have experience in cap-and-trade
        • Acid Rain SOx trading
        • RECLAIM program for criteria pollutants
        • Chicago Climate Exchange
encourage technology development
Encourage Technology Development
  • President Bush state of the Union speech
    • Call for more research and development
    • Primarily supply technologies
  • Equally important – if not more important – energy efficiency technologies
    • Rapid change possible through more efficient vehicles
      • Hybrid electric vehicles
      • Plug-in hybrids
      • Electric vehicles
      • Longer run: Possibly hydrogen vehicles
    • Buildings:
      • Lighting: light emitting diodes
      • Building design, technologies, operating processes
encourage technology development1
Encourage Technology Development
  • Governmental R&D
    • Federal
    • States (California Public Interest Energy Research Program)
  • R&D incentives
    • In energy bill
  • Technology competitions
  • Green labeling
encourage entrepreneurial efforts
Encourage Entrepreneurial Efforts
  • May look like no policy at all. 
  • Encourage technical and market experimentations
    • Some will ultimately make it big;  others will not. 
    • But the genius of Silicon Valley involves entrepreneurial efforts, risk-taking, pioneering efforts. 
    • Some of these will be failures, some successes. 
    • Successes will live on, grow to become the household names. 
      • will spawn more entrepreneurial challenges
      • The failures will typically lead to different attempts, some successes, some failures. 
    • Ahead of time impossible to know which will disappear and which will be the next Google. 
    • Lighting, vehicles are poised for fundamental change. 
adopt sector specific policies
Adopt Sector-Specific policies
  • Autos
    • Higher CAFE standards
    • Restructure CAFE standards with marketable efficiency credits
    • Labeling using common metrics people ($ per year?)
  • Electricity
    • Renewable Portfolio Standards; Carbon Dioxide Adders
  • Buildings
    • Building Efficiency Standards
  • Appliances
    • Appliance efficiency standards; Energy Star labeling
precourt institute
Precourt Institute
  • A research and analysis institute at Stanford
  • Established in October 2006
  • Initial funding: $30 million pledge by Jay Precourt
  • Mission
    • To improve opportunities for and implementation of energy efficient technologies, systems, and practices, with an emphasis on economically attractive deployment
    • Focus on the demand side of energy markets
  • Energy efficiency
    • Economically efficient reductions in energy use (or energy intensity)
  • Directed by James Sweeney
piee advisory council
PIEE Advisory Council
  • George Shultz, Council Chair, Thomas W. and Susan B. Ford Distinguished Fellow: Hoover Institution
  • Jay Precourt, Council Vice Chair, Chair and CEO, Hermes Consolidated
  • John Boesel, President and CEO: WestStart-CALSTART
  • Joseph Desmond, Former Chair, California Energy Commission
  • TJ Glauthier, TJG Energy Associates, LLC
  • Agatha Precourt, Consumer Marketing/Brand Management Consultant
  • Debra Reed, President and Chief Executive Officer, San Diego Gas & Electric and Southern California Gas Co.
  • Burton Richter, Director Emeritus, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center; Nobel Laureate, Physics
  • Ben Schwegler, Vice President / Chief Scientist: Walt Disney Imagineering
  • Byron Sher, Former California State Senator
  • Erik Straser, Partner: Mohr, Davidow Ventures
  • Bill Valentine, Chairman of the Board: HOK
  • Ward Woods, Retired President and CEO of Bessemer Securities
  • Jane Woodward, CEO: Mineral Acquisition Partners
intended activities
Intended Activities
  • Deepening theoretically-based and empirically-based understanding of the forces shaping energy use;
  • Developing innovative approaches for understanding the decision-making environment in corporations, public organizations and households that determine the deployment and use of energy efficient technologies and practices;
  • Undertaking physical and engineering research designed to create or improve energy efficient technologies and systems;
  • Designing and analyzing policies or other practices to enhance economically attractive deployment, for example, by overcoming market and policy barriers;
  • Engaging students and faculty in research and education associated with energy efficiency;
  • Working with affiliates and other organizations outside of Stanford to improve deployment of energy efficient technologies, systems, and practices.
research projects now underway faculty student teams
Research Projects Now Underway: Faculty/Student Teams
  • Frank Wolak
    • “Designing Mechanisms to Involve Final Demand in Wholesale Electricity Markets”
  • John Haymaker
    • “An Occupancy Model for Energy Efficient Design”
  • Larry Goulder
    • “Policies to Improve Automobile Efficiency/ US Climate Change Policy”
  • Hamid Aghajan/Stephen Boyd/Andrea Goldsmith
    • “Wireless Sensor Networks Technology for Smart Buildings”
  • Jim Sweeney:
    • “Assessment of Solid State Lighting”
    • “Hydrogen-fueled Internal Combustion Vehicles: Economic Assessment”
research projects now underway faculty student teams1
Research Projects Now Underway: Faculty/Student Teams
  • Pedram Mokrian (PhD Candidate)
    • Assessing the Value of Demand Side Resources
  • Kenny Gillingham (PhD Candidate, EPA STAR support)
    • Behavioral responses to Corporate Average Fuel Economy Increases
  • Jiyong Eom (PhD Candidate)
    • Game theoretical model of utility supplied energy efficiency measures
  • John Weyant/ Jim Sweeney
    • Energy Efficiency session for Snowmass Workshop on Integrated Assessment of Global Climate Change
  • Holmes Hummel (Postdoc)
    • Incorporation of Energy Efficiency into Long-Run Energy Systems Model