1 / 11

A new perspective on TB disease burden and TB control in Viet Nam Lessons from a prevalence survey

A new perspective on TB disease burden and TB control in Viet Nam Lessons from a prevalence survey. Philippe Glaziou Geneva, 12 October 2009. The problem with case detection rates. CDR not directly measurable Optimal TB surveillance systems capture almost all incident cases

barnabas
Download Presentation

A new perspective on TB disease burden and TB control in Viet Nam Lessons from a prevalence survey

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A new perspective on TB disease burden and TB control in Viet NamLessons from a prevalence survey Philippe Glaziou Geneva, 12 October 2009

  2. The problem with case detection rates • CDR not directly measurable • Optimal TB surveillance systems capture almost all incident cases • If surveillance is suboptimal, then what is directly measurable? • Prevalence (survey) • Mortality (vital registration) • Diagnosed patients: inventory studies • Mapping of providers • Size of diagnosed but not notified TB population

  3. High case detection and treatment success but no decline in notifications in Vietnam: Why?

  4. Prevalence survey showed prevalence much higher than previously thought *Source: Prof Sy. Report of the National TB Prevalence Survey in Vietnam, 2006-7

  5. Estimating the case detection rate from a prevalence measurement • CDR = N/P / (N/P + 1/d) [1] d denotes the average duration of disease • Duration: triangular distribution from 1 to 4 years, mode at 2 years (EV = 2.3) • Prevalence: normal distribution around point prevalence estimate from the survey, s.e. adjusted for sampling design [1] Borgdorff M. New measurable indicator for tuberculosis case detection. EID 2004; 10(9): 1523-1528

  6. Case detection rates in 2007

  7. Chronic cough lacks sensitivity,importance of relapses • Only 53% of prevalent sputum smear positive cases reported chronic cough • 22% of ss(+) cases previouslytreated for TB (8-month regimen used in past) • 36% more than 2 years before • 64% recently, 63% of them successfully • Sex ratio (M/F) = 4.5 (bacteriologically confirmed cases)

  8. Private providers • 8% of 326 suspects with history of TB treatment were treated in the private sector • PPM intervention project (HCMC)+18% notifications in PPM districts over 1 year (-1% in other HCMC districts) • Internal migrants moving to cities tend to access care from the private sector

  9. In-depth analysis of surveillance data Decline in notifications in older age groups, increase in young adults

  10. Lessons learned • Disease burden higher than previously thought: keep TB high on the political agenda • Notifications estimated to reflect trends in incidence, declining at an age standardized rate of -2%/yr, but increasing in 15-24 yr-old group • Importance of accounting for changes in demographic structure • Large pool of unreported cases in private sector • PPM, link with hospitals • Electronic recording and reporting • Improve screening, expand active case finding

  11. Conclusions • Prevalence surveys provide robustmeasurement of national coverage and impact of TB control • Combined with in-depth analysis of surveillance data, survey results help • understand and interpret epidemiological patterns and trends • update policies on TB screening and care • improve reporting • address the needs of at-risk populations

More Related