finite set statistics for sensor data fusion l.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Finite Set Statistics for Sensor Data Fusion PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Finite Set Statistics for Sensor Data Fusion

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 23

Finite Set Statistics for Sensor Data Fusion - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Finite Set Statistics for Sensor Data Fusion. Bahador Khaleghi Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence Lab. Outline. FISST Introduction Bayes Filter (Single Target) Multi-target Estimation FISST for Multi-Target Estimation Pros and Cons Approximating MT Bayes Filter

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Finite Set Statistics for Sensor Data Fusion' - ballard

Download Now An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
finite set statistics for sensor data fusion

Finite Set Statistics for Sensor Data Fusion


Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence Lab

  • FISST Introduction
  • Bayes Filter (Single Target)
  • Multi-target Estimation
  • FISST for Multi-Target Estimation
  • Pros and Cons
  • Approximating MT Bayes Filter
  • Practical Implementations
  • Demos
  • Conclusion and Future Work
what is fisst
What is FISST?
  • Random sets theory was first proposed to study integral geometry in 1970s
  • IDEA: treat sets as random elements within probabilistic framework
  • FISST is formulated for finite sets
  • FISST has not been popular for sensor data fusion as it has not been well understood
    • It comes from applied math community rather than computer science
why fisst
  • FISST enables unification of much of data fusion under a single Bayesian umbrella
  • Major potential contributions
    • A unified expert systems theory: fusion of imperfect and highly disparate data
    • A unified level 1 fusion: detection, tracking, and identification as a single problem
    • A unified performance evaluation framework
    • A Unified and optimal single-target and multi-target detection and estimation
optimal bayes filtering
Optimal Bayes Filtering
  • Relies on Bayes theorem to provide a solution to recursive target estimation problem


Prior Distribution

System State


Normalization Factor

optimal bayes filtering6
Optimal Bayes Filtering
  • Both Prior and Normalizing Factor involve integrals that generally can not be evaluated analytically
  • Kalman filter is fortunate exception for linear measurement and motion models
  • Approximation to Bayes filter
    • Approximations based on KF (e.g. EKF, UKF)
    • Approximate the integrals using particles (e.g. SMC)
  • Multi-target estimation is even more challenging
multi target estimation
Multi-target Estimation
  • Objective: estimate, at each time step, the multi-object state from a sequence of noisy and cluttered observation sets
  • Conventional Stages
    • Detection => Association => Tracking => Identification
multi target estimation8
Multi-target Estimation
  • Challenges
    • Noise
    • Missed and false detections (clutter)
    • Target dynamics (linear, nonlinear, manoeuvring)
    • Imperfect and disparate observations
    • Non-standard targets and scenarios, e.g. extended and unresolved targets
    • Varying number of targets, sensors
    • Data association problem
multi target estimation9
Multi-target Estimation
  • Conventional approaches
    • Solve the data association problem (e.g. MHT, JPDA) then apply Bayes (KF) filtering to them
    • Drawbacks
      • Measurements and motion models are approximate
      • Bayes filtering results are approximate
      • Data association is usually solve only in approximate
      • Many challenging aspects of problem can not be modeled explicitly in a principled manner
fisst for multi target estimation
FISST for Multi-target Estimation
  • FISST provides a natural yet rigorous mathematical tool to represent and compute in multi-target estimation systems
  • IDEA: represent the multi-target state and observations as finite sets instead of vectors
  • Rationale: vector representation
    • Does not admit a mathematically consistent notion of estimation error
    • Cannot represent all occurrences of multi-target state
fisst for multi target estimation13
FISST for Multi-target Estimation
  • Finite set representation
    • Casts estimation error as well-established concept of set distance
    • Can represent all possible occurrences
    • There is no inherent ordering of measurements or targets
  • Allows explicit modeling of many challenging aspects of (multi)target estimation
multi target bayes filtering15
Multi-target Bayes Filtering
  • It is not a straightforward generalization
  • Requires a novel calculus (derivative and integral) for finite random sets, which is a generalization of vector calculus (statistics 101)
  • Recent book by Mahler provides just this!
  • Results in closed form solutions for priors and likelihoods, which are not analytical ones as expected
sample fisst formulations
Sample FISST Formulations

Surviving Targets

Spawned Targets

Appearing Targets


Measurement Model

advantages vs drawbacks
Advantages vs. Drawbacks
  • Pros
    • Obviates data association problem
    • Formulates detection, tracking, and identification as a unified problem
    • A natural way of treating challenging effects involved in realistic tracking scenarios
  • Cons
    • Mathematically complex and less understood
    • Generally intractable (combinatorial complexity)
    • Track continuity problem
approximating mt bayes filter
Approximating MT Bayes Filter
  • In single-target case successful approximations are based on moment matching
    • e.g. Kalman filter: match the first two moments (i.e. mean and covariance)
  • PHD filter: propagates the first moment in MT case, i.e. Probability Hypothesis Density
  • Cardinalized PHD filter: propagates the PHD as well as pdf for number of targets (better estimation accuracy and adaptation)
approximating c phd filter
Approximating (C)PHD Filter
  • SMC method(s)
    • Require additional computations, i.e. particle clustering to extract multi-target state estimates
    • Higher flexibility
  • Gaussian Mixture
    • More computationally efficient
    • More restrictive, i.e. linear and mildly non-linear models
  • Both compare favourably with MHT and JPDA with less computational load
sample applications
Sample Applications
  • SMC-PHD Filter on Radar
sample applications21
Sample Applications
  • SMC-PHD Filter on Video
  • FISST is a mathematically principled and natural solution to multi-target estimation
  • FISST provides a unified framework for explicit modeling of all challenging aspects of problem with promising results
  • FISST potential to serve as a unifying framework for expect systems in both single-target and multi-target case is yet to be investigated
  • Many other aspects of data fusion systems may potentially be unified using FISST!