1 / 25

Southern California Natural Hazards Risk Assessment

Southern California Natural Hazards Risk Assessment. By: Aaron Mielke Allison Smith Emily Oleksiuk Tonia Roddick. Problem:. Where are the areas of high hazard from natural disasters? Are urban areas located in high hazard areas?.

bakermartha
Download Presentation

Southern California Natural Hazards Risk Assessment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Southern California Natural Hazards Risk Assessment By: Aaron Mielke Allison Smith Emily Oleksiuk Tonia Roddick

  2. Problem: • Where are the areas of high hazard from natural disasters? • Are urban areas located in high hazard areas?

  3. Earthquakes, Landslides, and Wildfire in Southern California • Contributing Factors: geology, climate, and human • use of landscape and resources

  4. Earthquakes, Landslides, and Wildfire in Southern California • Contributing Factors: geology, climate, and human • use of landscape and resources • How severe are these hazards and what are their • effects?

  5. Earthquakes, Landslides, and Wildfire in Southern California • Contributing Factors: geology, climate, and human • use of landscape and resources • How severe are these hazards and what are their • effects? • Goal of project: Determine hazardous areas in • Southern California and urban areas at high or • very high risk

  6. Earthquakes, Landslides, and Wildfire in Southern California • Contributing Factors: geology, climate, and human • use of landscape and resources • How significant are these hazards and why are • they a problem? • Goal of project: Determine high risk areas in • Southern California based on these hazards and • urban areas at high or very high risk • Applications of results: insurance companies, • land developers, and disaster preparedness

  7. Earthquakes, Landslides, and Wildfire in Southern California Study Area:Southern California 10 Southern Counties 57,000 Square Miles San Luis Obispo Kern San Bernardino Santa Barbara Los Angeles Ventura Riverside Orange San Diego Imperial

  8. Solving the Problem: Determining Fire Hazard • Data Layers • Fire Rotation  Rank townships • Fuel Ranking  Rank townships

  9. Calculating Fire Hazard Overlay and Rank

  10. Solving the Problem: Determining Earthquake Hazard • Data Layers • Fault Lines  Townships ranked by distance from fault • Historical Earthquakes  Townships ranked by EQ/miles^2 • Ground Acceleration  Townships ranked by area weighted ground acceleration value

  11. Calculating Hazard from Fault lines Buffer/rank Overlay Ranking (Distance from faults km) 0 >25km 1 (20-25km) 2 (15-20km) 3 (10-15km) 4 <10km

  12. Calculating Hazard from Past Earthquakes Overlay Rank Ranking (Earthquakes/mile^2) 0 0 1 (0-0.028) 2 (0.028-0.069) 3 (0.069-0.2) 4 >0.2

  13. Calculating Hazard from Ground Acceleration Overlay Rank Ranking (Ground Acceleration) (percent of gravity) 0 (0-13.6) 1 (13.6-22.8) 2 (22.8-34.8) 3 (34.8-54.8) 4 >54.8

  14. Calculating Overall Earthquake Hazard Faults Earthquake Ground Overall

  15. Solving the Problem: Determining Landslide Hazard • Data Layers • Precipitation Townships ranked by range of annual rainfall • Geology  Townships ranked by hardness of bedrock • Slope Townships ranked by steepness of slope

  16. Calculating Hazard from Precipitation Overlay Rank Ranking (Precipitation inches) 0 <2.5 1 (2.5-7.6) 2 (7.6-12.8) 3 (12.8-18.8) 4 >18.8

  17. Calculating Hazard from Geology Overlay Rank Ranking (Geology) 0 (0-1.2) 1 (1.2-3.1) 2 (3.1-4.1) 3 (4.1-4.6) 4 >4.6

  18. Calculating Hazard from Slope Overlay Rank

  19. Calculating Overall Landslide Hazard Precipitation Geology Slope Overall

  20. Results: • Hazard Maps: • Fire Hazard • Earthquake Hazard • Landslide Hazard • Overall Hazard • Urban Map • Numbers: • Percent of area classified as urban • Percent of population in urban areas • Percent of study area classified as high or very high hazard • Percent of urban area in high or very high hazard areas • Percent of population in high hazard areas

  21. Hazard Maps Fire Hazard Earthquake Hazard Landslide Hazard Overall Hazard

  22. Urban Areas in Southern California Los Angeles San Diego

  23. Urban areas overlayed on Hazard Map Urban Areas • Study area: • 57,115 square miles • 20,637,304 people • Urban Areas: 500 people/square mile or more • 3,158 square miles - 5.5% of Study area • 20,065,398 people - 97.2% of Study area population • High or Very High Hazard Areas: • 25,500 square miles - 42% of Study area • Urban Areas at High or Very High Risk: • 2011 square miles - 63% of urban areas are in high or very high hazard areas • - 3.4% of Study area is Urban and high or very high hazard area • 12,414,461 people - 62% of urban area population • - 60% of Study area population

  24. Improvements: Fire: Components of fire were averaged—a weighted average (as was done with the earthquake components) would probably be more accurate Earthquake: Faults were all buffered equally—it would be more accurate to put a heavier weight on faults that are more active than those that are less active. We used a straight count for the number of earthquakes per township—it would be more accurate to weight this count by magnitude Landslide: We used average annual precipitation in the landslide section— precipitation intensity data would have been useful Urban: We determined the threat to urban areas in terms of population density—this does not take into account expensive structures in less populated areas

  25. Questions?

More Related