Base Rates of Effort Test Failure in Veterans Diagnosed with Dementia: Alternative Cutoffs to Reduce False Positives in a Clinical Sample John Denning, Ph.D . and Randy Petersen, Ph.D. Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Alvin C. York VA Medical Center, Murfreesboro , Tennessee. Abstract
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Base Rates of Effort Test Failure in Veterans Diagnosed with Dementia: Alternative Cutoffs to Reduce False Positives in a Clinical Sample
John Denning, Ph.D. and Randy Petersen, Ph.D.
Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Alvin C. York VA Medical Center, Murfreesboro, Tennessee
Objective: Measures to detect the exaggeration of cognitive deficits have not been rigorously studied in large dementia samples. This study provides base rates of effort test failure and proposed cutoffs for freestanding and embedded measures in a sample of veterans diagnosed with dementia. Methods: Review of patients seen in a VA Neuropsychological clinic and diagnosed with dementia (n = 144, mean age = 73, mean education = 11; men = 98%, Caucasian = 90%). The Medical Symptom Validity Test (MSVT), Test of Memory Malingering Trial 1 (TOMM1 total, and errors on the first 10 items – TOMMe10), and embedded measures derived from the WAIS-III (Digit Span, Reliable Digit Span, WMI, and PSI), Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (recognition hits), Finger Tapping (dominant hand), and CVLT-II (forced choice) were included. Standard cutoffs were used for each measure and proposed cutoffs were derived with attempts to minimize false positives (FPs). Results: There were high FP rates across most embedded measures ranging from 28% to 47% at standard cutoffs with the only acceptable measure being Digit Span (ACSS ≤ 5, 8% FP rate). There was a 56% failure rate on the MSVT; however, the “Dementia Profile” accurately identified 94% of patients (6% FP rate). Adjusting TOMM1 from ≤ 40 (29% FP rate) to ≤ 30 resulted in a 9% FP rate. Conclusions: Base-rate data are sparse for how dementia patients perform on embedded and freestanding measures of cognitive exaggeration. Lower cutoffs appear warranted except for Digit Span and MSVT. Future studies may benefit from combining embedded and freestanding measures to reduce FP rates in dementia.
1Mild Dementia: n = 64; 2Severe Dementia: n = 61; 3Total Sample: n = 144
* The views expressed in this poster are those of the authors and do not reflect the position of the DVA or United States Government. This work was supported by the resources at the Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Alvin C. York VA Medical Center, Murfreesboro, TN