1 / 48

Location Analysis of Transcription Factor Binding

Location Analysis of Transcription Factor Binding. Tommy Computational Biology Seminar Nov. 2005. Background. Immuno Precipitation ChIP - Chromatin Immuno Precipitation Microarray evolution (from promoter arrays to tiling arrays) ChIP-chip (ChIP followed by microarray hybridization).

ayita
Download Presentation

Location Analysis of Transcription Factor Binding

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Location Analysis of Transcription Factor Binding Tommy Computational Biology Seminar Nov. 2005

  2. Background • Immuno Precipitation • ChIP - Chromatin Immuno Precipitation • Microarray evolution(from promoter arrays to tiling arrays) • ChIP-chip (ChIP followed by microarray hybridization)

  3. Things to do with ChIP chip… General method for identification of • Target genes of transcription factors • Transcribed genes (Pol II) • Transcribed miRNAs (Pol II) • Chromatin states (ABs for modified histones) • etc. – (any protein (mod AB) that binds DNA)

  4. Outline • Kim, Ren et al. Nature (2005)A high-resolution map of active promoters in the human genome. • Boyer, Young et al. Cell (2005)Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells. • Odom, Young et al. Science (2004)Control of pancreas and liver gene expression by HNF transcription factors.

  5. TFIIF 2 subunits 2 subunits Pol II TFIIA 2-3 subunits 12 subunits TFIID TFIIE TFIIB 15 subunits 1 subunit TFIIH 9 subunits General Transcription Factors (GTFs)

  6. Pol. II IIF TAFs IIA IIB TBP Formation of Pre-Initiation Complex • Localization at the promoter • DNA melting, initiation and elongation IIH IIE TATA BRE TSS Core promoter

  7. Kim, Barrera, Ren et al. Nature (2005)A high-resolution map of active promoters in the human genome • Accurate mapping of active promoters in human fibroblast cells (IMR90) • Active genes • Identify transcription start sites • DNA microarray of Human genomeNimbleGen 50bp probe every 100bp • ABs for Pol II preinitiation complex (PIC) • Computational aspectsdeconvolution of semi-continuous signal

  8. Kim et al. Map of active promoters Beware, spoiler! The Titanic drowns and Leo DiCaprio dies

  9. Kim, Barrera, Ren et al. Nature (2005)A high-resolution map of active promoters in the human genome • Found 12,150 bound regions (promoters) • 10,576 belong to 6,763 known genes • 1,196 un-annotated transcriptional units • Many genes with multiple promoters • Clusters of active promoters • Four classes of promoters • Many novel genes (RNA genes?)

  10. Kim et al. Map of active promoters Technicalities • Follows similar work on ENCODE regionsKim et al, Gen. Res. (2005); ENCODE project, Science (2004) • Chip design: series of DNA microarrays covering 14.5 million (!) 50bp probes, covering all the human genome* • IP design: Monoclonal AB to TAF1 (TAFII250) of TFIID * Except for genomic repeats

  11. Kim et al. Map of active promoters Method • Compare IP to control DNA • Identify stretches of 4 bound probes • Re-check using a new array • Computational detection of 12,150 peaks (Mpeak) • Compare to known genes(DBTSS, RefSeq, GenBank, EnsEMBL) • 87% matched 5’ ends of known mRNAs (up to 2.5Kb)

  12. Kim et al. Map of active promoters

  13. Kim et al. Map of active promoters Validation of results • Anti-RNAP AB re-found 97% of bound promoters • Standard ChIP found 27/28 of randomly selected bound promoters • Bound promoters are enrichment for known TSS elements • 97% of promoters had chromatin state of active genes – H3Ac, H3K4Me

  14. Kim et al. Map of active promoters Un-annotated promoters • 1,597 promoters are ≥ 2.5Kb from 5’ of known genes • 607 of them match EST • 632 of them are also bound by RNAP and in the “right” chromatin state • Measure mRNA expression of 567 promoters(50bp probes at 28Kb around each gene) • 35 new transcription units. Rest unstable? • One located 250bp ups to predicted miRNA  possible genes

  15. Kim et al. Map of active promoters

  16. Kim et al. Map of active promoters Un-annotated promoters • 1,239 putative promoters correspond to novel transcription units. • Evolutionary conserved • Enriched with core promoter motifs • 1,196 outside current gene annotation(13% of promoters)

  17. Kim et al. Map of active promoters Clusters of active genes • 256 clusters of ≥4 active genes(1,668 EnsEMBL genes) • 1609 genes had multiple promoters • Most have the same gene product • Some have different 1st exon • Some undergo different splicing • All at a single cell type!

  18. Kim et al. Map of active promoters Transcription machinaryvs.Gene Expression • 14,437 genes • IMR90 human fibroblast cells • Compare PIC occupancy to expression

  19. Classes I and IV are consistent (75% of genes) • Class II - PIC is bound, no expression • PIC is assembled but not sufficient for TXN • Contain immediate response genes (stress) • mRNA transcribes but degraded (miRNA targets?) • Class III - Expressed with no bound PIC • Test 10 random genes with ChIP (TFIID, RNAP) • Nearly 60% were weakly bound

  20. Kim, Barrera, Ren et al. Nature (2005)A high-resolution map of active promoters in the human genome • Found 12,150 bound regions (promoters) • Many genes with multiple promoters • 1,239 novel genes (RNA genes?) • Clusters of active promoters (chromatin) • Four classes of promoters

  21. Kim, Barrera, Ren et al. Nature (2005)A high-resolution map of active promoters in the human genome • So what have we learned?

  22. Odom, Young et al. Science (2004)Control of pancreas and liver gene expression by HNF transcription factors • Diabetes is bad. • Uncover the transcriptional regulatory network that control insulin secretion. • Human liver and pancreatic islets • Use ChIP for Pol II and 3 TFs • Measure expression of genes

  23. Odom et al. HNF regulation in pancreas and liver Background • Transcriptional regulation in the liver • HNF1α (homeodomain) • HNF4α (nuclear receptor) • HNF6 (onecut) • Same with the pancreatic islets? • All three are require for normal function • Mutations maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY3, MODY1) • Understand normal to explain abnormal

  24. Odom et al. HNF regulation in pancreas and liver MODY • maturity-onset diabetes of the young • Genetic disorder of the insulin-secreting pancreatic β cells • Onset of diabetes mellitus before 25 • Autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance • Not to confuse with type 2 (late-onset) diabetes • early-onset insulin resistance • functional defects in insulin secretion

  25. Pancreas β cell

  26. Hepatocyte

  27. Odom et al. HNF regulation in pancreas and liver Method • Identify targets of three TFs in two tissues • Identify transcribed genes (using Pol II) • Promoter array (13K genes) • -700bp to +200bp relatively to TSS

  28. Odom et al. HNF regulation in pancreas and liver Hepatocyte targets of HNF1α • 222 genes that represent a substantial section of hepatocyte biochemistry • gluconeogenesis and associated pathways • carbohydrate synthesis and storage • Lipid metabolism(synthesis of cholesterol and apolipoproteins) • Detoxification(synthesis of cytochrome P450 monooxygenases) • Serum proteins (synthesis of albumin and coagulation factors).

  29. Odom et al. HNF regulation in pancreas and liver Pancreas targets of HNF1α • 106 genes, 30% of which bound in liver • Fewer chaperons and enzymes • Receptors and signal transduction genes vary • Many known targets are missing… • Stringent criteria • Short promoters

  30. Odom et al. HNF regulation in pancreas and liver Targets • HNF6 binds 227 (1.3%) and 189 (1.45%), incl. important cell-cycle regulators • HNF4α 1575 (12%) and 1423 (11%) • Two different ABs • Western blots • Standard ChIP (50) • Other tissues (17) • Preimmune ABs bind not • 80% (73%) also bound by PolII.

  31. Odom et al. HNF regulation in pancreas and liver The transcriptome • “It is difficult to determine the transcriptome of these tissues accurately by profiling transcript levels with DNA microarrays.” • What is the appropriate reference RNA? • 2,984 (23%) are bound by Pol II in hepatocytes • 2,426 (19%) in islets, 81% of which by both • 80% (73%) of HNF4α are bound by Pol II • Three HNFs cover many of transcribed genes

  32. Odom et al. HNF regulation in pancreas and liver Regulatory network • Some differences between regulation in the two tissues

  33. Regulatory network motifs

  34. Odom et al. HNF regulation in pancreas and liver Multi-component loop • Capacity for feedback control and produce bistable systems that can switch between two alternate states [Milo et al, 2002] • The multi-component loop of HNF1α and HNF4α is responsible for stabilization of the terminal phenotype in pancreatic beta cells [Ferrer 2002]

  35. Odom et al. HNF regulation in pancreas and liver Feed-forward loop • A feedforward loop acts as a switch, sensitive to sustained inputs (rather than transient) • HNF6 serves as a master regulator for feed-forward motifs in hepatocytes and pancreatic islets • Involves >80 genes in each tissue

  36. Odom et al. HNF regulation in pancreas and liver Regular Chain motifs • Regulator chain motifs represent the simplest circuit logic for ordering transcriptional events in a temporal sequence

  37. Odom et al. HNF regulation in pancreas and liver Summary • HNF4α binds almost half of active genes in the liver and pancreas islets • Crucial for development and function of these tissues • Might explain why mutations can increase type II diabetes

  38. Boyer, Young et al. Cell (2005)Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells • Embryonic stem cells are important • Can be propagated in undifferentiated state • Can differentiate into >200 unique cell types • Great promise for regenerative medicine • Reveal transcriptional regulatory circuitry controlling pluripotency and self-renewal. • Early development and cell identity is controlled by several homeodomain TFs

  39. Boyer et al. Regulation in embryonic stem cells Background • Early development and cell identity is controlled by several homeodomain TFs • OCT4, SOX2, NANOG have central roles in maintaining the pluripotency of stem cells • KO of each results with differentiation • Over-expression of OCT4 ~ NANOG KO • Why? Identify targets of each and see…

  40. Boyer et al. Regulation in embryonic stem cells Method • Human H9 embryonic stem cells • Agilent promoter arrays • 60-mer probes • Spaced at ~300bp • Covering -8Kb to +2Kb relatively to TSS • Including 98% of TRANSFAC binding sites (Wow!!) • 17,917 genes • Replicate set of ChIP assay

  41. Analysis of peaks found: 623 genes (3%) 5 miRNAs (3%) Many known targets: Mouse ES cells Expressed in ES Improved protocol Better than Odom et al <1% FPR, 20% FNR Boyer et al. Regulation in embryonic stem cells OCT4

  42. 1271 genes (7%) 1687 genes (9%) Boyer et al. Regulation in embryonic stem cells SOX2 NANOG

  43. Boyer et al. Regulation in embryonic stem cells Binding in proximity • Co-binding suggests that OCT4, SOX2 & NANOG function together

  44. Boyer et al. Regulation in embryonic stem cells Function of TFs • Checked expression these genes in ES cells (published data) • 1,303/2,260 genes are active, 957 inactive • Of the 353 tri-bound genes, half active • Active include TFs(OCT4, SOX2, NANOG, STAT3, ZIC3), components of TGF-β and Wnt pathways • Inactive genes include developmental TFs(important for differentiation) • Many other homeodomain TFs

  45. Boyer et al. Regulation in embryonic stem cells Putative regulatory circuitry

  46. Boyer et al. Regulation in embryonic stem cells

  47. Boyer, Young et al. Cell (2005)Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells • So what have we learned?

More Related