280 likes | 396 Views
This paper explores recent advancements in the detection of ultra-high energy cosmic rays (UHECRs) and the associated propagation mechanisms in various mediums. It discusses detector strategies, including optical, radio, and acoustic methods, and examines factors such as decay processes, event rates, and interaction cross-sections. The research also addresses the challenges of measuring event types, background signals, and the opacity of the Earth at high energies. Additionally, it highlights the effectiveness of different detectors like IceCube and Auger in capturing and analyzing cosmic ray events.
E N D
Topics • Why … • Detector Scale • Event rate: flux, cross-section • Area/Volume etc. • Threshold • Detector Strategy • Optical • Radio concept • Coherent Radiation from Showers • Radio • Acoustic
Extreme Sources NRAO/AUI
UHE Propagation & GZK process CMBR is opaque ?? Galactic SN shock Extra Galactic
“top down” models • Decay/annihilation of defects • Decay of super heavy particles
1.9 Expectations for n-flux
Event Rates • Rate vs incident flux
Propagation • G is Greens function, determined by solving Boltzman eq. or MC techniques • Includes absorption, downscattering, regeneration, etc • Assume directivity G
Effective Area • For simple propagation
Cross-sections CTEQ-4 • Above PeV, neutrino=anti-neutrino. growth • of parton distribution in nucleon, CC ~ 2 NC • The Earth becomes opaque at high energy. • Uncertainty ~ 25% CTEQ-4 v. 6 (Aramo et al.)
1.9 Detector scale: 1 km3 v. 1000 km3 15 18
Detector Strategy • Event types • Visible energy • Signals: optical, radio, acoustic • Attenuation • In-situ/Remote • Medium/Location
Inelasticity EMC effect
Shower Detection Attenuation Length is critical
Medium & Location – (of better known efforts – several more)
Optical scenarios • IceCube • Auger • Ocean Observer
IceCube • A bit small – low energy • Low rates • Small acceptance from below • Cosmic Ray Background – muon bundles (veto by IceTop ?) • May have “useful” rate up to ~10 PeV • Measure s ?
IceCube II Upward showers! (Hussain, Mckay, Marfatia, Seckel)
Contained or Uncontained (Yoshida) Events with the same energy ~ 30PeV contained High npe: 107 npe uncontained Low npe: 1000 npe
NPE Distribution Distribution difference between the signals and background! GZK m GZK t Atmospheric m
Zenith Angle Distribution down • Signals peak at horizontal direction • Background distribute over down-going region up GZK m GZK t Atmospheric m
Event Rate with 80 strings GZK m GZK t Atmospheric m GZK m GZK t Atmospheric m IceCube Preliminary GZK m0.35events/year GZK t0.31 events/year Atmospheric m0.033events/year GZK: S. Yoshida et. al. (1997) ApJ 479:547 (m=4, Zmax=4)
AUGER (Let them speak…) • Upward tau’s • Earth skimming • Surface detector • Flourescence detector • Rock density, but area suppressed by projection • Downward events • New showers observed deep in atmosphere • Thin target density
Ocean Observer • Concept only • Cf. OWL, EUSO air shower detection • Pros: • 100 x light yield of flourescence • Compact spot – fast hot pixel • 10 x target mass • Cons: • Interface • Sea conditions • No track
Break • Remainder of detection summary contained in 2nd talk. • Includes discussion of radio technique, and overview of radio experiments.