1 / 6

67th IETF Meeting San Diego

Rajiv Papneja ( rpapneja@isocore.com ) Samir Vapiwala ( sva piwala@cisco.co m ) Jay Karthik ( jkarthik@cisco.com ) Scott Poretsky ( sporetsky@reefpoint.com ) JL Le Roux ( jeanlouis.leroux@orange-ft.com Shankar Rao ( shankar.rao@qwest.com ).

autumnt
Download Presentation

67th IETF Meeting San Diego

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Rajiv Papneja (rpapneja@isocore.com) Samir Vapiwala (svapiwala@cisco.com) Jay Karthik (jkarthik@cisco.com) Scott Poretsky (sporetsky@reefpoint.com) JL Le Roux (jeanlouis.leroux@orange-ft.com Shankar Rao (shankar.rao@qwest.com) IETF BMWGMPLS Protection MechanismsStatus and Update 67th IETF Meeting San Diego

  2. New Draft standing to become the WG item – draft - papneja - mpls - protection - meth - merge - 00 . txt June 2006 History/Background And Progress So Far Terminology For Protection Benchmarking Benchmarking Methodology for MPLS Protection draft - kimura - protection - term - 00 . txt - October 2002 Mechanisms draft - kimura - protection - term - 01 . txt - April 2003 draft - poretsky - mpls - protection - meth - 00 June 2003 Parallel Efforts draft - kimura - protection - term - 02 . txt – October 2003 draft - poretsky - mpls - protection - meth - 01 Oct . 2003 draft - kimura - protection - term - 02 . txt – April 2005 draft - poretsky - mpls - protection - meth - 02 Feb 2004 draft - poretsky - mpls - protection - meth - 03 draft - poretsky - mpls - protection - meth - 04 Created single work item July 2005 with common Terminology Common Terminology created With Effort led by Kimura - san Received numerous comments for additional test cases and benchmarking metrics Terminology For Protection e l b a Benchmarking – July 2005 c i l p p A draft - poretsky - protection - term - 00 . txt Created draft - poretsky - mpls - protection - meth - 05 Feb 2006 December 2005 More Protection Scenarios Proposed Under Final WG Item draft-vapiwala-bmwg-frr-failover-meth-00.txt Work Group Item 1. draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-meth-00.txt 2. draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-term-00.txt Mailing List Decision to Merge The two Efforts – Followed by action item from Dallas IETF WG Item Final Decision 1 . Significant Interest in the effort 2 . Interest has reached peak 3 . Formal Proposal Submitted to the Mailing list 4 . Significant support received / 5 . New Merged Draft Submitted

  3. Draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-meth-00.txt • After an overwhelming support on the list two complementing protection benchmarking methodology drafts were merged • draft-papneja-mpls-protection-meth-merge-00.txt • Further comments from the IETF 66 were incorporated to produce • Draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-meth-00.txt • Draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-term-00.txt

  4. Update from Previous Version • Retain the key elements of both drafts • draft-vapiwala-bmwg-frr-failover-meth-00.txt • draft-poretsky-mpls-protection-meth-05.txt • Added reviews and addressed comments received on • Draft-papneja-protection-meth-merge-00.txt • Removed any duplicate test cases or procedures • Simplified topologies and added self explanatory terms to the diagrams • Use common terminology as defined in • draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-term-00.txt • Added a basic MPLS benchmarking test

  5. Next Steps • Need for WG feedback on this new working group Item • What specific aspects would benefit from WG review? • Ensuring all FRR scenarios are covered • Ensuring all failure scenarios are covered by the current version • Input on the traffic profiling, that might assist in automations • New Terminologies • What issues are we seeking the WG's help to resolve? • Finalizing the terms in the terminology document, and agreement with the definitions • We look forward for the WG to advise on any issue with this work item • Looking forward to be ready for WG Last Call

  6. Acknowledgements • Thanks to BMWG-ers for support shown in the work item • The authors wish to thank the following for their invaluable input to the merged document • Curtis Villamizar • Jean Philippe Vasseur • Karu Ratnam • Arun Gandhi

More Related