1 / 4

Maximizing Revenues on State Corridors Pricing Best Practices September 24, 2013

Maximizing Revenues on State Corridors Pricing Best Practices September 24, 2013. Agenda Fare Increase Strategies Fare Restructuring Promotions/Specials. Fare Increase Strategies Should be Customized to Circumstances.

Download Presentation

Maximizing Revenues on State Corridors Pricing Best Practices September 24, 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Maximizing Revenues on State CorridorsPricing Best PracticesSeptember 24, 2013 Agenda • Fare Increase Strategies • Fare Restructuring • Promotions/Specials

  2. Fare Increase Strategies Should be Customized to Circumstances • A planned annual fare increase is one of the most effective methods for increasing revenue • Baseline yearly increase of 2%-3%: • Creates predictability – important when serving commuters, in particular • Generates minimal controversy with a relatively small price change • 2% increase – roughly the cost of living increase – is generally expected to have no negative ridership impact • Effective immediately with additional revenues generated shortly after release • Increase baseline can be adjusted depending on economic and financial requirements • For revenue-managed trains, variations on flat fare increase can minimize ridership and/or revenue risk. Scenarios include: • Increase applied on highest fares only • Mitigates risk on revenue-managed routes as the increase only applies where the train is selling out at the highest prices • Lowest selling fare is unchanged and targets the most price sensitive customers • Effective tactic during specific holiday periods • Apply a variable percent increase based on the revenue managed fare bucket; example: 2% on D, 3% on B/A, 4% on Y • Small increases done more often throughout the year • For non-revenue-managed routes, consider peak/off-peak (e.g., day-of-week) pricing

  3. Fare Restructuring Methods Based on Ridership & Revenue Statistics

  4. Best Practices for Promotions and Special Events • Carefully designed terms and conditions can maximize demand stimulation and revenues, while minimizing risk of revenue dilution • A limited sale period increases the sense of urgency to purchase • Long booking windows that match a long travel period are best suited for programs such as CVB, tour, etc. • At least one day advance purchase requirement minimizes revenue dilution • Use of specific buckets (if revenue managed) or specific departure times and/or day of week, drives traffic into the off-peak departures, thereby reducing revenue displacement and dilution • ‘Online only’ fares drive traffic to lower cost distribution channels • Recent launch of Fare Families on Amtrak.com improves customer experience • Promotion/advertising of existing prices is often the best approach • Special situations or seasons deserve more aggressive approaches • Response to bus competition includes both pricing and capacity tactics: • Additional capacity on peak departures • Introduction of new lower advance purchase fares supported by marketing • Flash sales promoted with intriguing prices for limited sale and travel periods • Peak holiday dates and high demand events merit additional capacity, if available • Group movements are well suited to excess inventory; however, high cancellation rates (70%) require strong ticketing requirements to minimize risks

More Related