Capital Project Pre-design

1. Capital Project Pre-design UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN PLANNING WORKSHOP APRIL 2007 (REVISED NOVEMBER 2008) Physical Planning Guide - Appendix H

2. Why change the process? • To permit more accurate project scope and budget to be developed prior to project enumeration • To reduce workload for institution and Capital Planning & Budget staffs Physical Planning Guide - Appendix H

3. How is pre-design funded? • Building Trust Funds - Planning • Will require building commission approval to release building trust funds. Physical Planning Guide - Appendix H

4. Which projects will have pre-design? • Major projects - PR & GPR • Complex or large All Agency projects Physical Planning Guide - Appendix H

5. What will the deliverable be? • A bound booklet Physical Planning Guide - Appendix H

6. What will the review process be? • Reviewed by institution • Reviewed by Capital Planning & Budget • Reviewed by DSF Physical Planning Guide - Appendix H

7. EXISTING PROCESS Physical Planning Guide - Appendix H

8. PROPOSED PROCESS Physical Planning Guide - Appendix H

9. CURRENT PROCESS Precise project scope determined by institution based on limited information and assumptions Precise general requirements determined by institution PROPOSED PROCESS General project scope determined by institution. Precise project scope determined through pre-planning Basic requirements and known conditions identified by institution. Precise requirements determined through pre-planning ProcessComparison Physical Planning Guide - Appendix H

10. CURRENT PROCESS Detailed space tab determined by institution: program verification occurs during design User description of functions and requirements determined by institution PROPOSED PROCESS Detailed space tab determined through pre-planning; program verification not required at implementation Basic user special requirements identified by institution. Detailed user description of functions and requirements determined through pre-planning Physical Planning Guide - Appendix H

11. CURRENT PROCESS Project siting assumed or not determined prior to design; siting impacts may not be known Utility requirements identified by institution based on assumptions Building location, footprint and massing assumed or not considered PROPOSED PROCESS Project siting analyzed and determined through pre-planning; siting impacts identified Utility requirements determined by analysis through pre-planning Building location, footprint and massing determined through pre-planning Physical Planning Guide - Appendix H