1 / 0

KEY TAX DEVELOPMENTS IN 2014 – A PRACTICAL PERSPECTIVE

KEY TAX DEVELOPMENTS IN 2014 – A PRACTICAL PERSPECTIVE. Jeff Connell, Tax Manager UK, Africa and Middle East Shell International Ltd 16 January 2014. DEFINITIONS AND CAUTIONARY NOTE.

aretha
Download Presentation

KEY TAX DEVELOPMENTS IN 2014 – A PRACTICAL PERSPECTIVE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. KEY TAX DEVELOPMENTS IN 2014 – A PRACTICAL PERSPECTIVE

    Jeff Connell, Tax Manager UK, Africa and Middle East Shell International Ltd 16 January 2014
  2. DEFINITIONS AND CAUTIONARY NOTE The companies in which Royal Dutch Shell plc directly and indirectly owns investments are separate entities. In this presentation “Shell”, “Shell group” and “Royal Dutch Shell” are sometimes used for convenience where references are made to Royal Dutch Shell plc and its subsidiaries in general. Likewise, the words “we”, “us” and “our” are also used to refer to subsidiaries in general or to those who work for them. These expressions are also used where no useful purpose is served by identifying the particular company or companies. ‘‘Subsidiaries’’, “Shell subsidiaries” and “Shell companies” as used in this presentation refer to companies over which Royal Dutch Shell plc either directly or indirectly has control. Companies over which Shell has joint control are generally referred to “joint ventures” and companies over which Shell has significant influence but neither control nor joint control are referred to as “associates”. In this presentation, joint ventures and associates may also be referred to as “equity-accounted investments”. The term “Shell interest” is used for convenience to indicate the direct and/or indirect (for example, through our 23% shareholding in Woodside Petroleum Ltd.) ownership interest held by Shell in a venture, partnership or company, after exclusion of all third-party interest. This presentation contains forward-looking statements concerning the financial condition, results of operations and businesses of Royal Dutch Shell. All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements of future expectations that are based on management’s current expectations and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these statements. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning the potential exposure of Royal Dutch Shell to market risks and statements expressing management’s expectations, beliefs, estimates, forecasts, projections and assumptions. These forward-looking statements are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as ‘‘anticipate’’, ‘‘believe’’, ‘‘could’’, ‘‘estimate’’, ‘‘expect’’, ‘‘goals’’, ‘‘intend’’, ‘‘may’’, ‘‘objectives’’, ‘‘outlook’’, ‘‘plan’’, ‘‘probably’’, ‘‘project’’, ‘‘risks’’, “schedule”, ‘‘seek’’, ‘‘should’’, ‘‘target’’, ‘‘will’’ and similar terms and phrases. There are a number of factors that could affect the future operations of Royal Dutch Shell and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements included in this presentation, including (without limitation): (a) price fluctuations in crude oil and natural gas; (b) changes in demand for Shell’s products; (c) currency fluctuations; (d) drilling and production results; (e) reserves estimates; (f) loss of market share and industry competition; (g) environmental and physical risks; (h) risks associated with the identification of suitable potential acquisition properties and targets, and successful negotiation and completion of such transactions; (i) the risk of doing business in developing countries and countries subject to international sanctions; (j) legislative, fiscal and regulatory developments including regulatory measures addressing climate change; (k) economic and financial market conditions in various countries and regions; (l) political risks, including the risks of expropriation and renegotiation of the terms of contracts with governmental entities, delays or advancements in the approval of projects and delays in the reimbursement for shared costs; and (m) changes in trading conditions. All forward-looking statements contained in this presentation are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Additional risk factors that may affect future results are contained in Royal Dutch Shell’s 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 (available at www.shell.com/investor and www.sec.gov ). These risk factors also expressly qualify all forward looking statements contained in this presentation and should be considered by the reader. Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of this presentation, 16 January 2014. Neither Royal Dutch Shell plc nor any of its subsidiaries undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or other information. In light of these risks, results could differ materially from those stated, implied or inferred from the forward-looking statements contained in this presentation. We may have used certain terms, such as resources, in this presentation that United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) strictly prohibits us from including in our filings with the SEC. U.S. Investors are urged to consider closely the disclosure in our Form 20-F, File No 1-32575, available on the SEC website www.sec.gov. You can also obtain these forms from the SEC by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. 2
  3. TOPICS Some brief context Shell Tax priorities Transparency BEPS How is life changing inside a multinational tax department?
  4. Shell is an innovation-driven global group of energy and petrochemical companies We are active in more than 70 countries Worldwide, we employ 87,000 full-time employees Our fuel retail network has around 44,000 service stations Each day we produce 3.3 million barrels of oil equivalent In 2012, we generated earnings* of $27 billion In 2012, we paid $21bn in corporate income taxes, and collected over $85bn in indirect taxes from our customers We had $29.8 billion of net capital investment We spent $1.3 billion on R&D Royal Dutch Shell plc is a UK company, with its headquarters in the Netherlands We are listed on the stock exchanges of Amsterdam, London and New York Context – Company profile * on a current cost of supplies basis attributable to Royal Dutch Shell plc shareholders Source: 2012 Annual Report and Form 20-F 4
  5. Context – Shell in the UK Shell in the UK A base here since 1897 In Upstream, a leading player in the North Sea for over 30 years, Today have an interest in over 50 fields, we produce 12% of UK oil and gas on behalf of ourselves and partners In Downstream we have around1100 branded service stations, serving 4 million customers per week We employ around 6,500 skilled staff and contractors in our operations Taxes In 2012 we paid $815m in corporate income taxes (CT, SCT & PRT) and collected just under $17bn of indirect taxes from our customers.
  6. Priorities for Shell Tax Safety / a healthy, world class workforce Managing down the number of open issues with tax authorities (“de-risking the past”) Moving to real time collaborative compliance wherever possible Operational excellence Partnering with the business to drive sustainable solutions
  7. Existing and developing strands of transparency Cooperative compliance Bi-lateral Tri-lateral (2 tax authorities simultaneously) Automatic information exchange EITI Mandatory disclosures by extractive companies of payments to governments Dodd Frank EU Rules being implemented by Member States Other (e.g. Canada, Australia) Full country by country reporting A panacea solution to all current issues?
  8. Shell position on transparency Support increased transparency in the extractive sector Active members of the Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative (EITI) since its inception in 2002 Believe host governments should be part of the discussion (as they are in EITI) Actively pursue cooperative compliance with tax authorities and committed to being transparent with them regarding business and tax matters We voluntarily published the payments we made to governments in 2011 and 2012. Solutions developed should be carefully aligned to the underlying objective
  9. CBCR / Shell in the UK Shell’s activities in the UK are carried out via approx 90 legal entities (no UK group consolidation) and include a mix of (not exhaustive!): Upstream (ring fence) operations across 50+ fields, some subject to PRT (total tax rate 81%), some not (62%); some producing & profitable, some approaching decommissioning. Upstream investment (100% first year allowances for qualifying capex in ringfence) Retail & other downstream businesses such as Aviation Oil and gas trading Treasury operations Shareholder services & a shared service centre Global advice and support functions carried out under a CCA
  10. BEPS – Shell’s position We support tax regimes that are stable, transparent, efficient and predictable. i.e. regimes that support and encourage investment and hence jobs and growth. We expect to pay tax once, in the country where activities take place and where the value is created. Time should be taken to develop sustainable solutions; business should be involved to contribute to these solutions. Cooperative compliance and cooperation between tax authorities should remain at the heart of the solutions. Shell supports a transparent and coordinated approach to dealing with country concerns on base erosion & profit shifting and urges constraint re any unilateral action.
  11. What does all this mean for a multinational tax department? New and different skills required Engaging with a much wider range of stakeholders internally and externally Senior management are more interested than ever in what we do Keeping up with the pace of change – the broad themes & the detail Determining when and how we provide input regarding potential changes Focus on what matters to the business (not necessarily always what most excites us intellectually!) Keeping current on how we consider and manage risk
More Related